• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Declassified Transcripts of Flynn-Kislyak Calls Released

jwzg said:
READ: Flynn, Kislyak transcripts of conversations during Trump transition | Fox News

Some traitor Flynn was.

Forum lawyers in 3,2,1..oh...we have riots.
Click to expand...

I've skimmed though the transcripts, but will read in it's entirety later this evening.

Thus far, I don't see anything that would justify the FBI's interview, or anything that would raise suspicions that something nefarious was going on. Unless I see something damning later on, I'd have to say that Trey Gowdy was absolutely correct, that there's nothing suspicious in there at all.

.
 
Grim17 said:
I've skimmed though the transcripts, but will read in it's entirety later this evening.

Thus far, I don't see anything that would justify the FBI's interview, or anything that would raise suspicions that something nefarious was going on. Unless I see something damning later on, I'd have to say that Trey Gowdy was absolutely correct, that there's nothing suspicious in there at all.

.
Click to expand...

Of course not, because, well, BIAS.

That's why people in the legal realm recuse. But Trump supporting forumers? "I see nothing'"

 
Airyaman said:
Of course not, because, well, BIAS.

That's why people in the legal realm recuse. But Trump supporting forumers? "I see nothing'"
Click to expand...

Really?

If you think my opinion thus far is way off base, then why don't you post something substantive showing that, rather than going on the attack?

.
 
Grim17 said:
Really?

If you think my opinion thus far is way off base, then why don't you post something substantive showing that, rather than going on the attack?

.
Click to expand...

What am I attacking? You seem defensive. Like a melting snowflake.
 
Grim17 said:
Really?

If you think my opinion thus far is way off base, then why don't you post something substantive showing that, rather than going on the attack?

.
Click to expand...

They won't because they haven't read them, won't read them, and will wait for talking points posted by someone else. Give it time.
 
Grim17 said:
Really?

If you think my opinion thus far is way off base, then why don't you post something substantive showing that, rather than going on the attack?

.
Click to expand...

Metric Mouse said:
They won't because they haven't read them, won't read them, and will wait for talking points posted by someone else. Give it time.
Click to expand...

My ignore list is full of these NPCs. I simply don't waste time on them.
 
jwzg said:
READ: Flynn, Kislyak transcripts of conversations during Trump transition | Fox News

Some traitor Flynn was.

Forum lawyers in 3,2,1..oh...we have riots.
Click to expand...

Well, I just finished reading the entire transcripts and Trey Gowdy was absolutely correct... There was a whole bunch of nothing in there.

There isn't a damned thing in any one of those calls that was in any way suspicious. In fact, their conversations were a snooze fest. I have to give Flynn credit though, he was definitely taking the diplomatic route and attempting to keep things between the US and Russia from escalating.

Since there was nothing on those calls indicating any kind of collusion, illegal activity, or anything that would justify not closing down the investigation of Flynn as the DOJ had instructed, Comey, Strzok, McCabe and a host of others at the FBI, DOJ and possibly even the Obama administration, are going to be very hard pressed to explain their actions.

Those transcripts make it clear that there was no legitimate reason for the FBI to be investigating Michael Flynn, so now the question now becomes who's idea was it to target Flynn and why. It's clear now it was either for personal reasons, political reasons, or both.

.
 
Grim17 said:
I've skimmed though the transcripts, but will read in it's entirety later this evening.

Thus far, I don't see anything that would justify the FBI's interview, or anything that would raise suspicions that something nefarious was going on. Unless I see something damning later on, I'd have to say that Trey Gowdy was absolutely correct, that there's nothing suspicious in there at all.

.
Click to expand...

Because there was nothing. It's important to know that incoming cabinet members and advisers have always had contacts with other countries as they were prepping the new administrations. It's all a democrat party hoax.
 
Integrityrespec said:
Because there was nothing. It's important to know that incoming cabinet members and advisers have always had contacts with other countries as they were prepping the new administrations. It's all a democrat party hoax.
Click to expand...

I already knew there was nothing there before they were ever released, but I went ahead and read them for myself just to confirm it. I wrote about it in the post just above yours.

.
 
Airyaman said:
Of course not, because, well, BIAS.

That's why people in the legal realm recuse. But Trump supporting forumers? "I see nothing'"
Click to expand...

Well I have read them, and there is nothing there to see.

If you disagree and believe there is something in those transcripts that justifies the FBI continuing their investigation into Michael Flynn, or justifies sending 2 agents to interview him about those calls that they already had the transcript for, then please speak up... because based on what I read, some folks from the FBI, DOJ and maybe even the Obama administration are in big trouble for setting Flynn up like they did.

.

.
 
Grim17 said:
Well I have read them, and there is nothing there to see.

If you disagree and believe there is something in those transcripts that justifies the FBI continuing their investigation into Michael Flynn, or justifies sending 2 agents to interview him about those calls that they already had the transcript for, then please speak up... because based on what I read, some folks from the FBI, DOJ and maybe even the Obama administration are in big trouble for setting Flynn up like they did.

.

.
Click to expand...

I'll let some legal folks tell you: Lawyers React to Flynn-Kislyak Calls | Law & Crime
 
Grim17 said:
I've skimmed though the transcripts, but will read in it's entirety later this evening.

Thus far, I don't see anything that would justify the FBI's interview, or anything that would raise suspicions that something nefarious was going on.
Click to expand...
Is it really hard to say that with a straight face?

You don't see why the FBI would want to interview the incoming National Security Advisor who is undermining official US policy during a secret call with the head Russian spy and seemingly giving aid and comfort to a country that just violated our laws in their act of war against our country? Really? No concerns there for you at all?

:lol:

Grim17 said:
Really?

If you think my opinion thus far is way off base, then why don't you post something substantive showing that, rather than going on the attack?

.
Click to expand...
Yes, because I'm sure posting something substantive is going to change your mind. :roll:

We all know the only thing that would have changed your mind is if Flynn was a Democrat working for an incoming Democratic President. To pretend otherwise is laughable.
Airyaman said:
What am I attacking?
Click to expand...
His honesty and objectivity?
Grim17 said:
There isn't a damned thing in any one of those calls that was in any way suspicious.
Click to expand...
Again, you don't think the incoming National Security Advisor who was an unregistered foreign agent of Turkey secretly undermining official US policy by seemingly giving aid and comfort to a hostile government who had just violated numerous US laws in their act of war against our country is "in any way suspicious"?

Again, is it hard to say that with a straight face?

Since there was nothing on those calls indicating any kind of collusion
Click to expand...
"Trump campaign member engages in secret talks with Russian spy to undermine official US policy for the benefit of the Trump campaign/administration and then lies about it is DEFINITELY not collusion of any kind!" -Grim

:lol:

I swear, Trump supporters say the stupidest things.

Those transcripts make it clear that there was no legitimate reason for the FBI to be investigating Michael Flynn
Click to expand...
Your statement is obviously false to anyone who is honest or not a complete idiot.
 
Last edited:
Slyfox696 said:
Is it really hard to say that with a straight face?

You don't see why the FBI would want to interview the incoming National Security Advisor who is undermining official US policy during a secret call with the head Russian spy and seemingly giving aid and comfort to a country that just violated our laws in their act of war against our country? Really? No concerns there for you at all?

:lol:


Yes, because I'm sure posting something substantive is going to change your mind. :roll:

We all know the only thing that would have changed your mind is if Flynn was a Democrat working for an incoming Democratic President. To pretend otherwise is laughable.
His honesty and objectivity?
Again, you don't think the incoming National Security Advisor who was an unregistered foreign agent of Turkey secretly undermining official US policy by seemingly giving aid and comfort to a hostile government who had just violated numerous US laws in their act of war against our country is "in any way suspicious"?

Again, is it hard to say that with a straight face?

"Trump campaign member engages in secret talks with Russian spy to undermine official US policy for the benefit of the Trump campaign/administration and then lies about it is DEFINITELY not collusion of any kind!" -Grim

:lol:

I swear, Trump supporters say the stupidest things.

Your statement is obviously false to anyone who is honest or not a complete idiot.
Click to expand...

You make a post that long and end up saying nothing. How about you actually comment on the transcripts themselves instead of spewing leftist talking points?

Why don't you point out what Flynn said that in any way indicates he was colluding with Russia, or indicates anything illegal or anti-American?

Then you can tell me (which we all know you will) how the FBI was justified in going after Flynn for the purpose of finding something to prosecute him for.

.
 
Grim17 said:
You make a post that long and end up saying nothing. How about you actually comment on the transcripts themselves instead of spewing leftist talking points?
Click to expand...
I said plenty and I did comment on the transcript, but I understand why you want to ignore what I said.

I'll say it again for you:

The incoming National Security Advisor was an unregistered foreign agent of Turkey secretly undermining official US policy on a phone call to the head Russian spy in America by seemingly giving aid and comfort to a hostile government who had just violated numerous US laws in their act of war against our country and then lied to the FBI about doing so.

Now explain why you don't think that is "in any way suspicious". Then I'll answer your other stupid questions.
Grim17 said:
I read the transcripts... Did you?
Click to expand...
Yes, which is why I know you are spouting obvious and false propaganda. :shrug:
 
I wonder what the Dec 22 call where the summary is completely redacted was all about.
 
Slyfox696 said:
I did comment on the transcript, but I understand why you want to ignore what I said.

I'll say it again for you:

The incoming National Security Advisor was an unregistered foreign agent of Turkey secretly undermining official US policy on a phone call to the head Russian spy in America by seemingly giving aid and comfort to a hostile government who had just violated numerous US laws in their act of war against our country and then lied to the FBI about doing so.

Now explain why you don't think that is "in any way suspicious". Then I'll answer your other stupid questions.
Click to expand...

That's a steaming pile of crap... Why don't you point out where all of this took place... You know, post the parts that fit your narrative.

It's not suspicious because nothing that was said was suspicious... He was simply trying to deescalate the situation and I give him a thumbs up for doing so. There were no laws broken, and don't even try that Logan act bull****.
 
Grim17 said:
That's a steaming pile of crap... Why don't you point out where all of this took place... You know, post the parts that fit your narrative.

It's not suspicious because nothing that was said was suspicious... He was simply trying to deescalate the situation and I give him a thumbs up for doing so. There were no laws broken, and don't even try that Logan act bull****.
Click to expand...
:lamo

Look who refuses to answer the question. I'll ask it again:

The incoming National Security Advisor was an unregistered foreign agent of Turkey secretly undermining official US policy on a phone call to the head Russian spy in America by seemingly giving aid and comfort to a hostile government who had just violated numerous US laws in their act of war against our country and then lied to the FBI about doing so.

Please explain why you don't think that is "in any way suspicious".

He was simply trying to deescalate the situation
Click to expand...
Who in the government asked him to?
 
Slyfox696 said:
:lamo

Look who refuses to answer the question. I'll ask it again:

The incoming National Security Advisor was an unregistered foreign agent of Turkey secretly undermining official US policy on a phone call to the head Russian spy in America by seemingly giving aid and comfort to a hostile government who had just violated numerous US laws in their act of war against our country and then lied to the FBI about doing so.

Please explain why you don't think that is "in any way suspicious".
Click to expand...

He was talking to the Russian ambassador, the same person the Obama administration communicated with, and he didn't undermine jack ****... You know why I know your just spewing leftist talking points? Because you haven't pointed out anything from the transcripts that supports your nonsense.

.
 
Slyfox696 said:
:lamo

Look who refuses to answer the question. I'll ask it again:

The incoming National Security Advisor was an unregistered foreign agent of Turkey secretly undermining official US policy on a phone call to the head Russian spy in America by seemingly giving aid and comfort to a hostile government who had just violated numerous US laws in their act of war against our country and then lied to the FBI about doing so.

Please explain why you don't think that is "in any way suspicious".

Who in the government asked him to?
Click to expand...

HAHAHAHAHA THE HEAD RUSSIAN SPY IN AMERICA???? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA You are too funny!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom