• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Barr says he does not expect criminal investigation of Obama or Biden as result of Durham probe

No matter how they slice it it's still baloney.

This one by Barr is hard to swallow for 'em yet Putin Trump & Rowers are just going to have to suck it up.

Putin Trump & Rowers have been hit in several ways this year that informs 'em the whole of it is a very big project that is now in decline with the ending of it becoming foreseeable.

They actually thought they were going to lock Hillary up and put away Obama, Biden, Eric Holder, Mueller's team, John Brennan and a long list of the IC -- FBI especially of course -- that defend the Constitution, protect it, preserve it.

They're finding out instead the country is much bigger and stronger than they are with their triumph of the will stuff. And the Rowers have been hit with the fact that they are as incompetent as Trump is, which is a real setback of a blow to 'em. Their posts show it and they know it as they flail about.
 
Tangmo said:
Reagan would be cussing Trump on Russia and on China. The only thing Reagan would ever accept from the Russians is a signed treaty reducing their military power in mutual terms while saying "trust but verify" meaning don't trust the bastards and make 'em show everything to us directly. Reagan welcomed and promoted Gorbechev's political and economic reforms because he knew from CIA they would burst Soviet Russia at its seams which is what it did do. Reagan worked with the Polish pope, Lech Walesa and Boris Yeltsen to bust the USSR which they did do together.
Click to expand...

Hahaha - Lefties like you trying to appropriate Reagan for themselves - "Ron was one of us!"
Well, technically he was a Democrat just like Trump was, before each of them left that party in frustration to go with Republicans. They each wanted to be with the people, and ultimately found that the people were with the Republicans.


As to Reagan and China, I posted that Reagan's "Big is good," enabled the biggest fish in the USA to chomp up schools of smaller fish to become astronomically big and wealthy enough to escape OSHA, labor laws and democracy at home by moving manufacturing to CCP China. Reagan presently would likely continue economic ties with CCP while making 'em pay so dearly for their military buildup they'd have to cut that back too. With Russia the reductions were of nuclear devices (and later intermediate missiles among others) while with China it would be cyberwar and the swarms of missiles China adds every day as the Boyz in Beijing have transfer applied their human wave assault doctrine to waves of missiles en masse instead. Reagan would make Beijing pay in the South China Sea to the extent the Boyz would have to agree to stand down, reduce the military presence, yield to the legit resource claims of the nations that front the Sea. Trump is focused on China's economics, trade, finance which Reagan wouldn't ever touch and for which Reagan's humongously wealthy patrons in CCP and USA would continue to be grateful.
Click to expand...


Trump is the one who's done the most to push back against China, and meanwhile your Democrats have pilloried him for it.
You Dem revisionists can't even allow the phrase "Hong Kong flu" anymore without screaming racism.


Kindly see the above concerning Reagan and manufacturing jobs to China. Your statements are mostly facts that are well known from the times of each Potus you reference. I've posted about 'em to include how GHW delivered to China 12 years of Reagan plus GHW's servitude to Chinese elites. He got derailed however due to the distraction of Gulf War I, the recession and the mobs of rightwingers with pitchforks taking after him for breaking his "no new taxes" pledge, which was the responsible thing to reverse.

Clinton was Beijing's personal gardener of Reagan's money trees in China while Counterfeit Bill wrung his hands golly gee about plant closures in the US. GW was an ideological opponent of CCP who nonetheless didn't interfere with their economic expansion, focusing on needling the Boyz about Taiwan and its newly elected pro independence president Chen who got reelected besides to keep GW's chuckles fun going. Obama presided over stability in the economics relationship to include trade and finance given the enormous task the US faced due to the 2008 Big Republican Bust. Still Bob Gates and his later successor and former adviser Ashton Carter got OB's ear on Beijing's things military despite the Obama Blind Right being oblivious of it.


Obama was an appeaser of China, and was totally derelict towards them on his watch.



Except for China who Trump has spent a lifetime hating Trump's isolationist America means we're going to fight 'em over here instead of over there. I used to wonder how and why you Putin Trump Rowers like the reality of it and are working tirelessly for it to occur. Not any more I don't wonder. The how and the why of Putin Trump Rowers is as self explanatory of this as it is explanatory of everything you do, ie, you'd rather be ruled by Russia than be governed by elected Democrats under the Constitution.
Click to expand...


On the contrary, not only Trump has marshalled nearby powers like Japan, SKorea, Australia, India towards a containment policy against China, but Trump has openly pursued a very economically clever strategy of relocating supply chains away from China, which mediocre thinker Obama never bothered to contemplate.
Click to expand...
 
uptower said:
That's kind of what was getting at. there's no doubt Barr is a sycophant, but he won't pick a battle he thinks he'll lose in court just for Trump's sake. He still knows his role and responsibilities.
Click to expand...

That is not a “roles and responsibilities “ thing...


It is a CYOA thing imho..

Bare might not give 2 flips about trump, but this is his chance to climb the ladder..

But he is not willing to risk jail time or anything crazy like that..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
sanman said:
Hahaha - Lefties like you trying to appropriate Reagan for themselves - "Ron was one of us!"
Well, technically he was a Democrat just like Trump was, before each of them left that party in frustration to go with Republicans. They each wanted to be with the people, and ultimately found that the people were with the Republicans.
Click to expand...

When I first registered to vote I registered Republican and I voted Republican, just not a straight party line. Then I grew up and I registered as a Democrat, still voting a cafeteria ballot. Your St. Ronnie who I did not vote for for Potus is your guy all the way yet precious few Conservatives and other Republicans know your Angel's devilish record on China which is an abysmal one.





Trump is the one who's done the most to push back against China, and meanwhile your Democrats have pilloried him for it.
You Dem revisionists can't even allow the phrase "Hong Kong flu" anymore without screaming racism. Obama was an appeaser of China, and was totally derelict towards them on his watch.
Click to expand...

That's more from the Obama Blind Right. In 2012 when Xi began in power Obama told Xi face to face not to build on Scarborough Shoal in the South China Sea off Luzon Island where Manila is. Xi needs Scarborough to close the CCP triangle in the Sea -- of Scarborough to the east, Paracels at the west off VN, and the Spratleys at the south and off Indonesia. OB said Beijing building on Scarborough would definitely cause the US to take radical action to stop it. Mattis said this and now Esper says it while Trump nods distractedly.

OB said this to Xi face to face each time he and Xi met. Scarborough which is named after a shipwreck has been a quiet and peaceful place since, save for some Philippines fishermen getting run off by PLA Navy ships from time to time in what the Chinese consider macho. Further, Scarborough is 20 minutes to US defense treaty ally Manila by PLA jet fighter or bomber not to mention a missile or two, so USA means business about it which CCP Boyz know well. Scarborough is also just south of the Bushi Strait between Taiwan and the Phils that is the only direct route of the PLA Navy from the SCS to the open western Pacific. US, Japan and Taiwan control Bushi and have its security covered while having the Phils back on Scarborough. Indonesia btw has sent a 40 ship Naval fleet to its Nansha islands at the Spratleys just for safe keeping over there. The Right is completely in the dark about these matters and much more concerning US defense and security vs CCP.







On the contrary, not only Trump has marshalled nearby powers like Japan, SKorea, Australia, India towards a containment policy against China, but Trump has openly pursued a very economically clever strategy of relocating supply chains away from China, which mediocre thinker Obama never bothered to contemplate.
Click to expand...

The Obama and Hillary "Pivot to the Pacific" with Bob Gates shifted 60% of US Naval assets to the India-Pacific region so when Trump moved into the WH Trump signed off on whatever Mattis said about it and now Trump checks in all of Esper's boxes on it each time Esper gives the newest list to the CinC. For instance, the USN Pacific Fleet that consists of the 3rd Fleet operating east of the IDL and the 7th Fleet operating west of the Line were made interoperable across the Pacific by then SecDef Ash Carter regardless of the IDL so 3rd Fleet ships are also in the SCS today and on almost any other given day. This is true despite the Obama Blind Right.
 
Tangmo said:
When I first registered to vote I registered Republican and I voted Republican, just not a straight party line. Then I grew up and I registered as a Democrat, still voting a cafeteria ballot. Your St. Ronnie who I did not vote for for Potus is your guy all the way yet precious few Conservatives and other Republicans know your Angel's devilish record on China which is an abysmal one.







That's more from the Obama Blind Right. In 2012 when Xi began in power Obama told Xi face to face not to build on Scarborough Shoal in the South China Sea off Luzon Island where Manila is. Xi needs Scarborough to close the CCP triangle in the Sea -- of Scarborough to the east, Paracels at the west off VN, and the Spratleys at the south and off Indonesia. OB said Beijing building on Scarborough would definitely cause the US to take radical action to stop it. Mattis said this and now Esper says it while Trump nods distractedly.

OB said this to Xi face to face each time he and Xi met. Scarborough which is named after a shipwreck has been a quiet and peaceful place since, save for some Philippines fishermen getting run off by PLA Navy ships from time to time in what the Chinese consider macho. Further, Scarborough is 20 minutes to US defense treaty ally Manila by PLA jet fighter or bomber not to mention a missile or two, so USA means business about it which CCP Boyz know well. Scarborough is also just south of the Bushi Strait between Taiwan and the Phils that is the only direct route of the PLA Navy from the SCS to the open western Pacific. US, Japan and Taiwan control Bushi and have its security covered while having the Phils back on Scarborough. Indonesia btw has sent a 40 ship Naval fleet to its Nansha islands at the Spratleys just for safe keeping over there. The Right is completely in the dark about these matters and much more concerning US defense and security vs CCP.









The Obama and Hillary "Pivot to the Pacific" with Bob Gates shifted 60% of US Naval assets to the India-Pacific region so when Trump moved into the WH Trump signed off on whatever Mattis said about it and now Trump checks in all of Esper's boxes on it each time Esper gives the newest list to the CinC. For instance, the USN Pacific Fleet that consists of the 3rd Fleet operating east of the IDL and the 7th Fleet operating west of the Line were made interoperable across the Pacific by then SecDef Ash Carter regardless of the IDL so 3rd Fleet ships are also in the SCS today and on almost any other given day. This is true despite the Obama Blind Right.
Click to expand...

Lmao...


There is not a conservative voter who could follow any of your post lol...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Tangmo said:
When I first registered to vote I registered Republican and I voted Republican, just not a straight party line. Then I grew up and I registered as a Democrat, still voting a cafeteria ballot. Your St. Ronnie who I did not vote for for Potus is your guy all the way yet precious few Conservatives and other Republicans know your Angel's devilish record on China which is an abysmal one.
Click to expand...

Nixon, Reagan, and Bush Sr were all pro-China, there's no secret on that - and so were Democrats.

But while Republicans today have sensibly shifted away from that position, Democrats still continue to be pro-China.


That's more from the Obama Blind Right. In 2012 when Xi began in power Obama told Xi face to face not to build on Scarborough Shoal in the South China Sea off Luzon Island where Manila is. Xi needs Scarborough to close the CCP triangle in the Sea -- of Scarborough to the east, Paracels at the west off VN, and the Spratleys at the south and off Indonesia. OB said Beijing building on Scarborough would definitely cause the US to take radical action to stop it. Mattis said this and now Esper says it while Trump nods distractedly.
Click to expand...

Sorry, but Trump is not pro-China compared to everybody else. He's the toughest on China out of any leader in recent memory.

OB said this to Xi face to face each time he and Xi met. Scarborough which is named after a shipwreck has been a quiet and peaceful place since, save for some Philippines fishermen getting run off by PLA Navy ships from time to time in what the Chinese consider macho. Further, Scarborough is 20 minutes to US defense treaty ally Manila by PLA jet fighter or bomber not to mention a missile or two, so USA means business about it which CCP Boyz know well. Scarborough is also just south of the Bushi Strait between Taiwan and the Phils that is the only direct route of the PLA Navy from the SCS to the open western Pacific. US, Japan and Taiwan control Bushi and have its security covered while having the Phils back on Scarborough. Indonesia btw has sent a 40 ship Naval fleet to its Nansha islands at the Spratleys just for safe keeping over there. The Right is completely in the dark about these matters and much more concerning US defense and security vs CCP.

The problem is that wasn't enough against the Chinese, who've simply bided their time and come back in greater force and numbers.
Trump has taken the bull by the horns and been going after their economic underpinnings, which is the more meaningful strategy compared to Obama's brief brushes with China.


The Obama and Hillary "Pivot to the Pacific" with Bob Gates shifted 60% of US Naval assets to the India-Pacific region so when Trump moved into the WH Trump signed off on whatever Mattis said about it and now Trump checks in all of Esper's boxes on it each time Esper gives the newest list to the CinC. For instance, the USN Pacific Fleet that consists of the 3rd Fleet operating east of the IDL and the 7th Fleet operating west of the Line were made interoperable across the Pacific by then SecDef Ash Carter regardless of the IDL so 3rd Fleet ships are also in the SCS today and on almost any other given day. This is true despite the Obama Blind Right.
Click to expand...

Freudian slip - you'd never hear Democrats talking about a "pivot to Europe". See, the word "pivot" itself implies a sudden furtive movement, as if the Atlantic theater is the main default orientation for America. Unfortunately, it has been the main orientation for Democrats ever since Woodrow Wilson. Republicans, who are more US-centered, are more practical in being able to objectively give the Asia-Pacific theater its due, rather than having to "pivot" towards it.
Click to expand...
 
sanman said:
Nixon, Reagan, and Bush Sr were all pro-China, there's no secret on that - and so were Democrats.

But while Republicans today have sensibly shifted away from that position, Democrats still continue to be pro-China.




Sorry, but Trump is not pro-China compared to everybody else. He's the toughest on China out of any leader in recent memory.

OB said this to Xi face to face each time he and Xi met. Scarborough which is named after a shipwreck has been a quiet and peaceful place since, save for some Philippines fishermen getting run off by PLA Navy ships from time to time in what the Chinese consider macho. Further, Scarborough is 20 minutes to US defense treaty ally Manila by PLA jet fighter or bomber not to mention a missile or two, so USA means business about it which CCP Boyz know well. Scarborough is also just south of the Bushi Strait between Taiwan and the Phils that is the only direct route of the PLA Navy from the SCS to the open western Pacific. US, Japan and Taiwan control Bushi and have its security covered while having the Phils back on Scarborough. Indonesia btw has sent a 40 ship Naval fleet to its Nansha islands at the Spratleys just for safe keeping over there. The Right is completely in the dark about these matters and much more concerning US defense and security vs CCP.

The problem is that wasn't enough against the Chinese, who've simply bided their time and come back in greater force and numbers.
Trump has taken the bull by the horns and been going after their economic underpinnings, which is the more meaningful strategy compared to Obama's brief brushes with China.




Freudian slip - you'd never hear Democrats talking about a "pivot to Europe". See, the word "pivot" itself implies a sudden furtive movement, as if the Atlantic theater is the main default orientation for America. Unfortunately, it has been the main orientation for Democrats ever since Woodrow Wilson. Republicans, who are more US-centered, are more practical in being able to objectively give the Asia-Pacific theater its due, rather than having to "pivot" towards it.
Click to expand...

First and for the record the technical aspects of your reply posts -- which are of course integral to the integrity of a post -- are wanting. You have your own flying post replies to my posts that are nonetheless presented as a part of your post, among other technical failures. You're not the only one however. So I'll do with you as I have done to another poster who also has technical problems in his reply posts, ie, cease posting with you until whatever the technical glitch may be is corrected. Because there's no reason I should be cleaning up your posts technical problems so that my reply posts don't get fouled up technically too. I hope this improves soon thanks in advance for your understanding.

The one comment I will make on the post itself is that it is a cheap shot to try to present me as saying Trump is not tough on China.
Click to expand...
 
Tangmo said:
sanman said:
Nixon, Reagan, and Bush Sr were all pro-China, there's no secret on that - and so were Democrats.

But while Republicans today have sensibly shifted away from that position, Democrats still continue to be pro-China.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

And actually, I'll further clarify/correct myself on that - it's Trump Republicans who have sensibly moved away from China, although there are still Swamp Republicans who are still onboard with China and its payola.


First and for the record the technical aspects of your reply posts -- which are of course integral to the integrity of a post -- are wanting. You have your own flying post replies to my posts that are nonetheless presented as a part of your post, among other technical failures. You're not the only one however. So I'll do with you as I have done to another poster who also has technical problems in his reply posts, ie, cease posting with you until whatever the technical glitch may be is corrected. Because there's no reason I should be cleaning up your posts technical problems so that my reply posts don't get fouled up technically too. I hope this improves soon thanks in advance for your understanding.
Click to expand...

I don't know what the hell you just said there - you talk like a politician.

The one comment I will make on the post itself is that it is a cheap shot to try to present me as saying Trump is not tough on China.
Click to expand...

Oh, so you agree Trump is tough on China? Okay, then I rest my case on that.
 
bluesmoke said:
Manson directed others to kill. That he caused, set into motion the physical act of, the killing means he killed. He was convicted of murder and sentenced to death. Before the sentence was carried-out, California abolished the death penalty and Manson's sentence was reduced to life.

Charles Manson and his followers convicted of murder - HISTORY
Click to expand...

Never confuse Trumpsters with facts. They really really really hate it when you do that. Theyve got their eyes focused on their golden calf.
 
Aberro said:
Barr says he does not expect criminal investigation of Obama or Biden as result of Durham probe | Fox News

Some animals are more equal than others.

Charles Manson got life in prison, but he was never convicted of killing anyone.
Click to expand...


Well, we can certainly see the disappointment. You Trumpsters all fell for the latest Trump meme.

And its falling apart before it even gets off the ground.

Blame it on Trump.

The GOP and the Trump campaign already know that this “unmasking “ meme is bogus. Its just a variation on the equally hokey and amateurish midnight ride stunt that Devin Nunes pulled when he ran to the White House to repeat the Trump talking points in front of a TV camera.

Its obvious that the GOP leadership was lukewarm at best.

They knew it was already BS. Graham was publicly dragging his feet over holding hearings. He finally put them off till June (obviously in the hope that the whole thing would fall apart before then, and the talk radio suckers would be off to their next Trumpian meme).

Trump put a stake in the heart of the thing himself, when he bellowed that Obama should be called to testify. Which no one in GOP actually wants. Not even Victoria Toensing or Joe DiGenova, who were teh ringleaders behind this campaign.

So, it was left to Trumps wingman, Barr, to put the spike in this one.

Of course, it will come back in the form of Trump dog whistles. And the bobble heads will bob their heads and repeat the lie that this campaign was designed to plant in the minds of the Trumpster minds. Facts dont matter. Memes do. And they will go back, time and time again, to people who have lied to them in the past, and accept the next lie as absolute truth.

It isnt as if the average Trumpster actually reads past the headline or the first paragraph.
 
Trump is tough on the CCP Dictator Tyrants in Beijing and I've welcomed that for as long as Trump has been doing it and will continue to do it. Anyone who might think he's extracted that from me just now like a tooth would be a fool.

I've also noted that the China specialists and experts in the Democratic Party quit on China during Obama's second term due to the complete change of attitude by Xi Jinping's people that there's no more give and take between USA and CCP. Xi's attitude is that what's China's is China's and what's the world's is China's instead -- USA included of course. We see this visibly in the South China Sea.

Trump picked up on that quiet development by speaking loudly and carrying a big stick. I haven't any problem with that, never have had one and don't expect to have any problem with it.
 
TomFitz said:
Never confuse Trumpsters with facts. They really really really hate it when you do that. Theyve got their eyes focused on their golden calf.
Click to expand...



Oh, they're not confused by facts. Facts are unable to penetrate into their brain to cause any confusion. Trump and Trumpsters, though, are all about causing chaos and confusion. Out of which comes no order based on logic or fact other than serves as pretense.
 
Trump says it's the biggest crime of the century but his AG doesn't want to prosecute? Trump is deep state.

Я Баба Яга [emoji328]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom