So Trump is broke from all his business failures, huh? Okay.LOL! All objective evidence indicates that he's terrible at his job, having lost more money than any other individual in the history of the United States, multiple bankruptcies, he's so incompetent he couldn't make money with casinos, nothing but shuttered failures (airline, vodka, steaks, etc..) and he's been found by federal courts to be a fraud, ala twump U.
Sad that our current POTUS is such a crining whore.
So Trump is broke from all his business failures, huh? Okay.
Something tells me he's used to it, but he can't help himself.
My apologies. I didn't believe anyone familiar with the controversies of the day couldn't define the meaning of 'fake news'. I'll give the definition, as a favor, but next time please look up these meanings for yourself. Fake news - Wikipedia
Oh, so he is successful then. We agree.Where did I claim he was broke?
This seems to have you quite confused.
"Fake News" need not be libelous. Trump is suing for libel, quite another issue,Under that definition, how is a news article about a Trump lawsuit considered to be “fake news”? To refresh your memory, here is the article:
Trump Campaign Sues New York Times for Libel - The New York Times
Oh, so he is successful then. We agree.
Trump did welcome the Russian help and promised Putin he would remove the sanctions if he won. That's one reason Flynn is going to jail. Why do you have to make the simplest of cause and effect events and twist them like a pretzel? If Congress had not acted the Russian sanctions would have been gone his first month in office. Trump has never stopped trying to get the blame for election meddling removed from Russia because then he could claim the sanctions were unjustified and get the Senate to remove them. You can be sure Putin mentions those sanctions every time they talk.
Yes, you're probably a wonderful person, but who rapes 13 year old chidren?
Congress didn't legislate the sanctions until the spring 2017. Meanwhile, Trump never lifted them when he had the authority.
Flynn wasn't convicted because he discussed the circumstances for lifting sanctions. He we convicted for lying about it.
"Fake News" need not be libelous. Trump is suing for libel, quite another issue,
He didn't lift the sanctions because he couldn't. Senate Republicans told him so and then backed it up with a bill. Trump is still trying to find ways to do as he promised to Putin. That is what Barr was jetting around the world for. To find some way of absolving Russia for the election meddling that brought the sanctions.
Under the headline:Trump is alleging libel over the following article, which is a NY Times opinion piece:
Opinion | The Real Trump-Russia Quid Pro Quo - The New York Times
It’s an opinion, not news. It’s a real opinion, not a fake one. But, it’s not news at all, let alone “fake news”. Here’s an article on the difference between news and opinion, for your edification:
News vs. opinion: The difference matters | Opinion | presspubs.com