That's untrue.There was this dude that ran on a campaign of lock her up, lock her up.
And that seems odd given that all, or most, of the charges relate to lying to the FBI or Congress. Do you think there might be a two tiered system?She is still free while that dude coworkers are going to jail.
That's untrue.
And that seems odd given that all, or most, of the charges relate to lying to the FBI or Congress. Do you think there might be a two tiered system?
That's correct but it was never made a campaign issue by Trump, as you claimed.13 months after the election, attendees of Pres. Trump's campaign-style rally in Pensacola, FL break into "lock her up" chant at mention of Hillary Clinton http://cbsn.ws/2AFDvZ5 pic.twitter.com/bZSwME9WG9
That's also false. Some members of the crowd did, as you can see by the video, but not 'the crowd'.— CBS News (@CBSNews) December 9, 2017
The crowd at President Trump’s Friday night campaign rally broke into chants of “lock her up” after Trump mentioned Hillary Clinton.
Trump supporters chant 'lock her up' at campaign rally | TheHill
That's about right but still not something he campaigned on, as you claimed.AMBRIDGE, Pa. — Halfway through his remarks to supporters in a high school gym here Monday, Donald Trump paused for a minute to revel in the crowd’s chants. They shouted, “Lock her up.” The Republican nominee clapped along.
“Very sad,” Trump said, swiveling back to the microphone to continue speaking. “Special prosecutor, here we come.”
Trump Savors "Lock Her Up" Chants at Pa. Rallies | RealClearPoliticsTrump on 'lock her up' chant: 'I'm starting to agree'
By Jeremy Diamond, CNN
Updated 8:33 PM ET, Fri July 29, 2016
Donald Trump on 'lock her up' chant: 'I'm starting to agree' - CNNPolitics
Do you think we were discussing minorities?There is more than a 2 tiered system. Just ask any minority. Especially black people.
Yes, nothing was ever done. I asked if you felt there was a two tier justice system. I'll explain. Some Americans were sent to jail for lying, and lost almost everything in defending themselves, while Hillary Clinton lied under oath and, as you say, nothing happened. Based on this understanding, and the facts before us, is there a two tiered justice system??But tRUMP has the DoJ for 3 yrs and she's still a free citizen.
So, my conclusion is, it was campaign BS with no real teeth to it.
That's correct but it was never made a campaign issue by Trump, as you claimed.
That's also false. Some members of the crowd did, as you can see by the video, but not 'the crowd'.
That's about right but still not something he campaigned on, as you claimed.
Do you think we were discussing minorities?
Yes, nothing was ever done. I asked if you felt there was a two tier justice system. I'll explain. Some Americans were sent to jail for lying, and lost almost everything in defending themselves, while Hillary Clinton lied under oath and, as you say, nothing happened. Based on this understanding, and the facts before us, is there a two tiered justice system??
Trump said nothing wrong and Hillary Clinton did lie and refused to obey subpoenas. What do you find wrong with what Trump said? Hillary Clinton should be charged and we can only hope Durham does his job.(CNN)Donald Trump on Sunday night issued a remarkable threat against Hillary Clinton, telling the Democratic presidential nominee he would seek to imprison her if he was elected next month.
"If I win, I am going to instruct my attorney general to get a special prosecutor to look into your (missing email) situation," Trump said, "because there has never been so many lies, so much deception."
Trump's threat -- which he has made before on the campaign trail -- is extraordinary even by the standard of the vitriolic 2016 campaign.
Donald Trump threatens to jail Hillary Clinton - CNNPolitics
The video at the link also shows him stating he will look into her past to try to get her to jail.
Which he has likely done. And she is still free.
So, there's a 2 tiered or more system, or she hasn't enough evidence to convict.
Our justice system has always favored those with money and power. Always.
And no this isn't about blacks. But it does show the tiers in our justice system. At a level that doesn't just pertain to DC elites.
Trump said nothing wrong and Hillary Clinton did lie and refused to obey subpoenas. What do you find wrong with what Trump said? Hillary Clinton should be charged and we can only hope Durham does his job.
Do you really want a justice system where some have their lives ruined while others who have broken the same laws go free?
I'm very suspicious of the DOJ however there is still the Durham Report to come. If you genuinely want an honest judicial system don't you think Hillary should face the same charges others committing the same crimes, such as perjury, have faced?Correct. Lock her up.
Do I want a corrupt justice system? LOL. Of course not.
Are you saying tRUMPs DoJ is completely incompetent? And can't bring charges on her? Or are you claiming he is part of the corrupt system?
More nothing?
This is about tRUMP people going to jail vs obama ppl going to jail.
If you're gonna list congress critters who have done illegal things, I suspect the list would number in 1000s.
There was this dude that ran on a campaign of lock her up, lock her up. She is still free while that dude coworkers are going to jail.
I'm very suspicious of the DOJ however there is still the Durham Report to come. If you genuinely want an honest judicial system don't you think Hillary should face the same charges others committing the same crimes, such as perjury, have faced?
Others are also suspicious of the power structure in DC and how justice tends to go to the politically connected. Gregg Jarrett Predicts No Justice From Durham Probe - Gregg Jarrett
Out of curiosity, are you asserting that the Illegal Server in her personal residence was not illegal?
Actually we know she is guilty because we can see her lying and Comey said she was lying. So why has the DOJ not acted? That leaves another alternative which is that Hillary Clinton, among others, is just too politically powerful to be charged with her crimes. Rep Trey Gowdy rips into FBI Director James Comey on Hillary Clinton'''s '''intent'''think everyone should. Without a doubt. 3 yrs in, when on a debate stage with Hilary, he said he'd investigate her with his DoJ, she is still free.
1 of 2 conclusions comes to my mind.
1) She is not guilty of what is being bantered about
2) tRUMPs DoJ is part of the system you are railing against.
There's actually not much to think about. We know that crimes have been committed and they're on video.But, I have no doubt, the elites have a different set of rules than you and I. No doubt. But I don't pretend to think 1 party is getting more favor than another party. Especially when the opposite party is in power and your crime girl is still walking free.
Exactly. She feels immune from any crimes and still feels eligible for higher office.In fact, I seen a thread somewhere where Hilary is going to start a blog or something on this prez election. Also, her name has popped up as a running mate.
Yes, many will just go along with their beliefs and the political party they support.I also suspect no fallout of the Durham probe. And I know very little to nothing about it. I just know, either the connected won't be brought to justice or what is being politically brought forth is BS. I suspect some of both.
There isn't much Trump can do apart from appointing the right people to get the job done. The Senate will likely object no matter who i is.. Perhaps Barr isn't the man.But, we elect those in DC. We allow any 2 tiered system one thinks may exist. And the now in power party with the man claiming to drain the swamp seems to be a part of that. Why?
Do you have evidence it was illegal? I suspect if it was truly illegal, tRUMPs DoJ would have levied charges already.
What I think is irrelevant. I don't have access to all details to even have the slightest idea if it was legal or illegal. That is why we have the DoJ, is it not?
However there is hope that maybe, just maybe, justice will be served. Hillary Clinton can be deposed about her emails, judge rules - CNNPoliticsComey was absolutely clear that at this was illegal.
However, he conjured the idea that there needed to intent. Whiskey Tango Foxtrot!
He wanted us to believe that the server broke into her house and set itself up without her intending to use it.
Also that everyone who sent her emails, including the Big 0, used it by accident.
Again, Whiskey Tango Foxtrot!