• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Prosecutor withdraws from Roger Stone case

Michael Cole said:
I never had an ex do that. What's it like? Why is she an ex? Did you overhear a suspicious phone call? Did you suspect she was a bit of a party girl? When you confronted her, did she say her phone call was perfect? Is that why she's an ex? You broke up with the best woman ever in the universe, over a phone call? A perfect call.
Click to expand...

Oh my, we've got another AOC. Doesn't understand that analogies are just that.
 
Hawkeye10 said:
So you are out of arguments already then....
Click to expand...

Your argument never started. Your source is an opinion piece. Read it again and post the factual argument from your source...you can't.
 
mrjurrs said:
Ever wonder why sources from The Federalist never list their name in the cite?
Click to expand...

You mean like the Ukraine whistleblower and the leaker in the Mueller Report? (Even though we all knew who it was in each.)
 
jmotivator said:
The President is the chief law enforcement officer in the country.

As such, the president has the power to pardon, so....

But yeah, get bent out of shape over sentencing guidelines. :roll:
Click to expand...

He can pardon, commute, reprieve...but he can't manipulate the DoJ to address specific cases.
 
mrjurrs said:
He can pardon, commute, reprieve...but he can't manipulate the DoJ to address specific cases.
Click to expand...

LOL!!! He can clear someone of charges, but he can't suggest their punishment? That is one helluva logical pretzel you are twisting yourself into. :lamo

And you are just wrong. The DOJ answers to the President. The president has ultimate authority over sentencing guidelines within the department. This is the same authority under which Obama issued his DACA EO.
 
jmotivator said:
LOL!!! He can clear someone of charges, but he can't suggest their punishment? That is one helluva logical pretzel you are twisting yourself into. :lamo

And you are just wrong. The DOJ answers to the President. The president has ultimate authority over sentencing guidelines within the department. This is the same authority under which Obama issued his DACA EO.
Click to expand...

That's right, and you give the dims to much credit. Allowing active duty military who were brought here as children to remain as the Americans they are, is far more egregious than just simply doing a little favor for a friend.
 
Rexedgar said:
The plot thickens....

The withdrawal by prosecutor Aaron Zelinsky came after the initial sentencing guidance was sharply criticized by President Trump, raising questions about potential political interference in the sentencing of Stone. Stone was found guilty of lying to Congress and witness tampering.



Prosecutor withdraws from Roger Stone case
Click to expand...

Lead juror social media page proves bias against defendant.
Can you say mistrial.
 
Outlook said:
Lead juror social media page proves bias against defendant.
Can you say mistrial.
Click to expand...

**** yeah. The entire trial needs to be scrapped. Stone's rights to a FAIR trial has been violated.
 
Michael Cole said:
That's right, and you give the dims to much credit. Allowing active duty military who were brought here as children to remain as the Americans they are, is far more egregious than just simply doing a little favor for a friend.
Click to expand...

:roll: Your stupid emotional argument is stupid. We are discussing Presidential authority with regard to DOJ policies and priorities. Whether or not you agree with the policy doesn't change the truth of my point.
 
jmotivator said:
:roll: Your stupid emotional argument is stupid. We are discussing Presidential authority with regard to DOJ policies and priorities. Whether or not you agree with the policy doesn't change the truth of my point.
Click to expand...

I disagree. I think my stupid argument is not stupid. I wasn't addressing policy. I was addressing comparing Trump corruption to DACA. I believe that was your stupid emotional argument.
 
Michael Cole said:
I disagree. I think my stupid argument is not stupid. I wasn't addressing policy. I was addressing comparing Trump corruption to DACA. I believe that was your stupid emotional argument.
Click to expand...

You were making a stupid emotional argument. Reiterating that that is what you did doesn't make it smarter.
 
Michael Cole said:
The cic has eggs benedict for brains. Not a whole lot to destroy.
Click to expand...

It is clear democrats do not think Trump has anything to compare with the likes of Karl Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Castro, Alinsky, Chavez, Hillary Clinton, Obama, John Brennan, the Rosenberg couple and more.
 
marke said:
If the commies take over, lots of good leaders will be imprisoned in the democrat gulag for resisting communism.
Click to expand...

You don't have to worry about communists, you need to worry about Americans that understand the importance of the rule of law.
 
Erod said:
You mean like the Ukraine whistleblower and the leaker in the Mueller Report? (Even though we all knew who it was in each.)
Click to expand...

i don't see any relationship. one is a magazine (for profit), two are subject to government laws.
 
jmotivator said:
LOL!!! He can clear someone of charges, but he can't suggest their punishment? That is one helluva logical pretzel you are twisting yourself into. :lamo

And you are just wrong. The DOJ answers to the President. The president has ultimate authority over sentencing guidelines within the department. This is the same authority under which Obama issued his DACA EO.
Click to expand...

Don't understand do you? None of the presidents power include the clearing of charges. Deny it? Find one, just one, example. The DACA eo was based on prosecutorial discretion, not removing sentences. You've got some studying to do.
 
Michael Cole said:
That's right, and you give the dims to much credit. Allowing active duty military who were brought here as children to remain as the Americans they are, is far more egregious than just simply doing a little favor for a friend.
Click to expand...

That's not right. Get some proof.
 
Erod said:
Oh my gawd, can you imagine the collective national eye roll that will induce? You guys are like that ex that won't stop calling a year after the breakup. Get over it already.
Click to expand...

Hard to get over something that keeps happening. When I was a prosecutor I had a case like that. It's frustrating when the perp keeps offending and you keep having to bring additional charges (he even dealt dope while awaiting trial). Kinda like Roger Stone. I suspect she got over you pretty quick. Did she get a restraining order?
 
marke said:
Nobody knows everything. If you will admit Trump may know more than Schiff I will admit Schiff knows more than he admits to, like who the whistleblower is and how the whistleblower gave Schiff the false pretense he needed to convict Trump on charges of wrongdoing which could never be legally proven in the House because Schiff suspended the rule of law.
Click to expand...

All of that seems off topic to me, so I'll reserve comment. I responded to your statement that Trump gets more intelligence information than generals. At the time he made his claim, that was impossible.
 
mrjurrs said:
You don't have to worry about communists, you need to worry about Americans that understand the importance of the rule of law.
Click to expand...

I like American laws. Immigration laws. Religious protection rights laws. Voter ID protection and registry cleansing laws. Defense of traditional marriage laws. Laws guaranteeing the rights of Americans to keep and bear arms. Laws mandating due process and defense protections in criminal trials laws. Laws protecting government secrets from meddlers who have no business getting their hands on government secrets and doing damage to the US government by acts of sedition laws. Voting methods and protections such as the EC laws. And so forth.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom