• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

More Hillary Smears Disproved

SLC said:
Why do you think The Clinton Foundation donations dropped like a rock when Hillary lost and had no political power to peddle.
Click to expand...
People stop donating to a charity if it being accused of a crime regardless of whether that crime happened or not. Rich people don't like being associated with investigations.

Your thinking is small.


Я Баба Яга [emoji328]
 
jpn said:
Quote Originally Posted by jpn:
What's your opinion of the Trump Foundation?



You've posted twice this morning about the Clinton Foundation, but suddenly are all worried about being off topic when I ask about the Trump Foundation.

Wow, an inconsistent conservative. And I thought I'd never see one...:roll:
Click to expand...

Wow, a liberal that cant stay on topic and deflects to Trump whenever possible, we have metric crap tons of those...
 
SLC said:
She had personal experience with con men adulterers if she was the smartest woman in the world she should have been able to handle Trump.
Click to expand...

Trump, Hannity and Limbaugh have you guys in their back pockets. Once Trump started with his normal con job (lies) about Healthcare and the Debt and the Wall and locking her up he conned some swing voters too.

But that's okay. Sometimes the country screws up. We'll eventually undo everything bad from this era just like people did after the Confederacy.
 
OpportunityCost said:
Wow, a liberal that cant stay on topic and deflects to Trump whenever possible, we have metric crap tons of those...
Click to expand...

Hillary has been investigated over ane over, and no one has ever found jack squat. She wins, the clowns lose.
 
beefheart said:
Hillary has been investigated over ane over, and no one has ever found jack squat. She wins, the clowns lose.
Click to expand...
These people think winning a contest proves innocence but the exoneration of nearly dozen investigations which have found nothing means guilt.

That's why Trump was impeached.

Я Баба Яга [emoji328]
 
Moderate Right said:
I don't understand what any of that has to do with Trump.
Click to expand...

You don't understand what the Trump Foundation has to do with Trump?

I'm so glad I'm not a Republican.
 
Iron Yank said:
I could just as well claim the very same thing of you. Newsweek has been fake news for years now and that is a well known fact and as far as Bush go's. He's a Globalist crook just like the Clintons and Obama. They should all be locked up for lying and getting us into multiple wars that were for the benefit of special interests and not that of the American people as a whole
Click to expand...

Newsweek is not the only media to report the same thing.

Think critically, Iron Yank... think!!!!! Don't be a victim of propaganda.
 
beefheart said:
Hillary has been investigated over ane over, and no one has ever found jack squat. She wins, the clowns lose.
Click to expand...

I was on topic. I was demonstrating what a guilty person (Trump) looked like compared to an innocent person (Clinton).
 
jpn said:
I was on topic. I was demonstrating what a guilty person (Trump) looked like compared to an innocent person (Clinton).
Click to expand...

I didn't say you were off topic
 
Admittedly, not the point of this thread but I think it's great that Trump donated to the Clinton Foundation and later, he tried to throw them under the bus. :lamo
 
jpn said:
I was on topic. I was demonstrating what a guilty person (Trump) looked like compared to an innocent person (Clinton).
Click to expand...

sorry. That's what I get trying to watch football and do this.
 
jpn said:
You don't understand what the Trump Foundation has to do with Trump?

I'm so glad I'm not a Republican.
Click to expand...

We were talking about Hillary. You guys claim all the time that whataboutism is not allowed and yet you guys do it all the time.
 
Moderate Right said:
We were talking about Hillary. You guys claim all the time that whataboutism is not allowed and yet you guys do it all the time.
Click to expand...

You guys? I can't speak for everyone who doesn't watch Fox News, but personally, I don't do that.
 
jpn said:
You guys? I can't speak for everyone who doesn't watch Fox News, but personally, I don't do that.
Click to expand...

We were talking about Hillary and YOU started talking about Trump.
 
Did Jeffery Epstein kill himself?

Or did he join the long list of Clinton victims?

We all know the answer to that question.
 
Hatuey said:
People stop donating to a charity if it being accused of a crime regardless of whether that crime happened or not. Rich people don't like being associated with investigations.

Your thinking is small.


Я Баба Яга [emoji328]
Click to expand...
So now the donations should shoot back up right?
 
Moderate Right said:
We were talking about Hillary and YOU started talking about Trump.
Click to expand...

Oh. Actually you're right, I did. And I do. The thing is, you guys always have someone on your side who is way worse than you're accusing our side of. So when you start getting all in a lather because there's a 1988 photo of Hillary Clinton jaywalking, maybe, it's kind of grainy and it may not actually be Hillary and besides, it looks like it's at an intersection but BOY it's the worst thing EVER, it's really hard not to point to the President who was caught, oh, let me think of something, there's so much to choose from...I know, caught using his "charity" as a personal petty cash fund so that people who donated money thinking it was going to veterans actually saw that money going to his election campaign, paying personal debts, and buying portraits for his properties and saying, really? Do you know that as part of the settlement his kids were ordered to go to a special class to learn not to be a crook like their dad, the president?

Just hard not to point out little things like that.
 
Last edited:
SLC said:
So now the donations should shoot back up right?
Click to expand...

They could. They're still in operation, still helping people all over the world. Unlike, say, the Trump Foundation, that was closed down because it was so corrupt. Trump had to pay a $2 million fine and his kids had to go to how-not-to-be-a-crook-like-dad school. Did you know that?
 
jpn said:
Well, of course you wouldn't. And you personally wouldn't think Russia's involvement was the thing either, would you? No, that would suggest that she should have won, if it wasn't for GOP-sanctioned Russian interference in our election. And you can't believe that, can you? Of course not.

The reason? Because thinking that is uncomfortable. And if there's one thing we know about Republicans, they don't allow themselves to entertain uncomfortable thoughts. The Fox alternative reality is so much more comforting.
Click to expand...
No, it's because I don't think that was the only reason she lost - given her opponent even that shouldn't have mattered, the race shouldn't have been that close.
 
The Mark said:
No, it's because I don't think that was the only reason she lost - given her opponent even that shouldn't have mattered, the race shouldn't have been that close.
Click to expand...

I think when I responded I had you mixed up with someone else. I apologize. I agree that it's insane that a race against a ignorant, lying, vulgar psychopath would be within 30 percentage points. But America is a very special place...:roll:
 
roguenuke said:
Its funny how people forget or just don't even realize that in the 90s, while Bill was President, there were numerous pop culture jokes about Hillary being President, being the brains behind Bill. They needed each other. She needed/needs his charisma and he needed/needs her drive/political savvy. They are actually a really good pair, as they compliment each other for what they need between them. They are definitely both very intelligent, but they still have different traits that make them very good as politicians, and they are better together. (They both have faults too though which has been part of the reason they are not as popular as they certainly could be.)
Click to expand...

Completely agree.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom