• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Sarah Sanders ‘Seriously Considering’ Run for Arkansas Governor

Grand Mal said:
From last month...
Donald Trump fined $2m for misusing charity for political ends | US news | The Guardian

Money donated to the Trump Foundation at an event to benefit veterans. Siphoned off to use in the campaign, to buy Tim Tebow memorabilia and for a portrait of Trump. Can you imagine if either Clinton had done that? Imagine if either Clinton had been fined $2M for corruption? Or hey, how about this- imagine if Hillary Clinton had hired a porn star for a night and then paid him hush money? Or what about this- imagine Clinton University being declared a fraud scheme and being ordered to repay $25M to folks that had been scammed?
Oh yeah, there's no doubt who is the most corrupt.
Click to expand...

But, but the Clintons were never caught! ;)
 
Nalu said:
I'm not sure exactly. It's completely subjective. When she was press secretary, I sensed a discomfort in her as she lied and spun. I'm not excusing her behavior. It's inexcusable. I just think she knew that what she was doing (and continues to do) is wrong.
Click to expand...

Well, that makes it worse. If she believed in what she was saying, we might say that she was naive but fundamentally not a bad person. But if she knew that she was lying (and I'm sure she did) but willingly kept doing it, that's exactly what makes of her a bad person.
 
GreatNews2night said:
Well, that makes it worse. If she believed in what she was saying, we might say that she was naive but fundamentally not a bad person. But if she knew that she was lying (and I'm sure she did) but willingly kept doing it, that's exactly what makes of her a bad person.
Click to expand...

I'm not going to defend Sanders. Maybe she is a bad person. She talks about some gawd a lot. She can judge her.
 
Grand Mal said:
From last month...
Donald Trump fined $2m for misusing charity for political ends | US news | The Guardian

Money donated to the Trump Foundation at an event to benefit veterans. Siphoned off to use in the campaign, to buy Tim Tebow memorabilia and for a portrait of Trump. Can you imagine if either Clinton had done that? Imagine if either Clinton had been fined $2M for corruption? Or hey, how about this- imagine if Hillary Clinton had hired a porn star for a night and then paid him hush money? Or what about this- imagine Clinton University being declared a fraud scheme and being ordered to repay $25M to folks that had been scammed?
Oh yeah, there's no doubt who is the most corrupt.
Click to expand...
No doubt at all.

I have no problem imagining them being fined for corruption, or Bill threatening a porn star about an encounter. It's quite easy to imagine any of that because they would stop at nothing, eg the Clintons were renting the guest bedroom in the White House.
 
Jay59 said:
No doubt at all.

I have no problem imagining them being fined for corruption, or Bill threatening a porn star about an encounter. It's quite easy to imagine any of that because they would stop at nothing, eg the Clintons were renting the guest bedroom in the White House.
Click to expand...

But you don't need any imagination with Trump. You can imagine Clinton's being fined for corruption but in Trumps case you can quote the judges.
Nobody anywhere has been investigated more thoroughly than the Clintons, and no President has ever been judged more corrupt than Trump. Judged as in a courtroom, not judged as in the lunchroom at work.
 
Superfly said:
I would never classify her as a good person. She’s pretty horrible. She’s a brazen, unashamed liar, and she got paid to do it.

If Arkansas votes her in, they get what they deserve.
Click to expand...

Worse.

Its ok for some Christians to do anything in support of a man in power.


The reasoning being that they wouldn't be in power if god didn't want them to be.

And god sometimes chooses imperfect vessels to do his works. King David is an example they use.

I first heard about this in the Netflix(?) special on The Family.

But I've heard others allude to the idea since then.

She went to school to learn how to lie effectively. Double major. Communications and Political Science.

Soldier for the theocracy.
 
Grand Mal said:
But you don't need any imagination with Trump. You can imagine Clinton's being fined for corruption but in Trumps case you can quote the judges.
Nobody anywhere has been investigated more thoroughly than the Clintons, and no President has ever been judged more corrupt than Trump. Judged as in a courtroom, not judged as in the lunchroom at work.
Click to expand...
I don't have to imagine that the Clinton's did something to deserve the fine. That's common knowledge. Proving it in court has always been the issue.
 
Jay59 said:
I don't have to imagine that the Clinton's did something to deserve the fine. That's common knowledge. Proving it in court has always been the issue.
Click to expand...

Aw shucks. Too bad we can’t prosecute people without any proof. What a world we live in.

I mean - the horror, amirite?
 
rocket88 said:
But anyone who buys Trump's propaganda is a stable genius!
Click to expand...

If someone calls put propaganda from your side while denying that there is propaganda from their side, they are really stupid or lying to your face.

Those are the only possibilities.
 
Jay59 said:
I don't have to imagine that the Clinton's did something to deserve the fine. That's common knowledge. Proving it in court has always been the issue.
Click to expand...

Common knowledge. That anything like common sense?
Imagine what you like- it's not worth a pinch of coon **** until the judge's gavel falls. And the gavel has fallen on Trump more times than he can remember. Not just criminal stuff, he couldn't say for sure how many times he's been sued.
Like I said, nobody has been investigated as much as the Clintons. Year's of investigations and nothing. So either there's nothing to find or the people looking are complete incompetents. But if that's so, if they're incompetent, getting Trump for corruption must have been like shooting fish in a barrel.
 
Grand Mal said:
Common knowledge. That anything like common sense?
Imagine what you like- it's not worth a pinch of coon **** until the judge's gavel falls. And the gavel has fallen on Trump more times than he can remember. Not just criminal stuff, he couldn't say for sure how many times he's been sued.
Like I said, nobody has been investigated as much as the Clintons. Year's of investigations and nothing. So either there's nothing to find or the people looking are complete incompetents. But if that's so, if they're incompetent, getting Trump for corruption must have been like shooting fish in a barrel.
Click to expand...
It's tempting to say there are no CT about the Clintons, because they are all true. That would be an exaggeration.

It is no exaggeration to say they are much more corrupt than Trump. It is no exaggeraton to say that Hillary's email server, alone, is worse than everything which Trump has been accused.
 
Jay59 said:
It's tempting to say there are no CT about the Clintons, because they are all true. That would be an exaggeration.

It is no exaggeration to say they are much more corrupt than Trump. It is no exaggeraton to say that Hillary's email server, alone, is worse than everything which Trump has been accused.
Click to expand...

Resist the temptation. Hillary's e-mail server was investigated ad nauseam by people who hate her and there's nothing there. Zip, zero, zilch. If there was anything there it would have been found.
And It's not accusations with Trump. Here, from last month...

Donald Trump fined $2m for misusing charity for political ends | US news | The Guardian

Guilty of fraud. Fined $2M. Or here, from last year...

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...versity-settlement-judge-finalized/502387002/

The word 'swindle' was featured in that one. $25M this time around.
Wanna guess how many times Trumps been sued? Hint- It's 4 digits.
 
marke said:
She is a really good woman who is hated by really bad unamerican communists and socialists.
Click to expand...

I disagree. Sarah Sanders is a chip of the old Mike Huckabee block. Pretentious self-serving Christians in name only. There's no proof of their Christian religion in their words, actions or deeds. They're nothing more than heretics to Christianity. Mike Huckabee's defense of Josh Duggar was indefensible.
 
HumblePi said:
I disagree. Sarah Sanders is a chip of the old Mike Huckabee block. Pretentious self-serving Christians in name only. There's no proof of their Christian religion in their words, actions or deeds. They're nothing more than heretics to Christianity. Mike Huckabee's defense of Josh Duggar was indefensible.
Click to expand...

Your views are clearly leftist. Leftists generally do not respect good Christians for any reason.
 
marke said:
Your views are clearly leftist. Leftists generally do not respect good Christians for any reason.
Click to expand...

So you have nothing concrete to counter with. And liars are not good christians no matter what you believe.
 
Last edited:
Grand Mal said:
Resist the temptation. Hillary's e-mail server was investigated ad nauseam by people who hate her and there's nothing there. Zip, zero, zilch. If there was anything there it would have been found. And It's not accusations with Trump. Here, from last month...

Donald Trump fined $2m for misusing charity for political ends | US news | The Guardian

Guilty of fraud. Fined $2M. Or here, from last year...
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...versity-settlement-judge-finalized/502387002/

The word 'swindle' was featured in that one. $25M this time around.
Wanna guess how many times Trumps been sued? Hint- It's 4 digits.
Click to expand...
You keep saying it was investigated ad nauseum, but not that she was innocent. Have any idea of the number of felony counts were tied up in the email server. Each classified email is a felony and each day is a new felony. It's a felony to have the email, to receive it, to send it, to modify it. To delete one is multiple felonies. The violations were found, many thousands of them. They refused to prosecute. It's called a double standard. Several of the same people are now under criminal investigation for trying to set up Donald Trump.

Only Republicans get prosecuted for violating the law. In Trumps case, he was impeached when he didn't even do that much.
 
Jay59 said:
You keep saying it was investigated ad nauseum, but not that she was innocent. Have any idea of the number of felony counts were tied up in the email server. Each classified email is a felony and each day is a new felony. It's a felony to have the email, to receive it, to send it, to modify it. To delete one is multiple felonies. The violations were found, many thousands of them. They refused to prosecute. It's called a double standard. Several of the same people are now under criminal investigation for trying to set up Donald Trump.

Only Republicans get prosecuted for violating the law. In Trumps case, he was impeached when he didn't even do that much.
Click to expand...
the jails are full of young, black and latino republicans, didn't you know
 
Jay59 said:
You keep saying it was investigated ad nauseum, but not that she was innocent. Have any idea of the number of felony counts were tied up in the email server. Each classified email is a felony and each day is a new felony. It's a felony to have the email, to receive it, to send it, to modify it. To delete one is multiple felonies. The violations were found, many thousands of them. They refused to prosecute. It's called a double standard. Several of the same people are now under criminal investigation for trying to set up Donald Trump.

Only Republicans get prosecuted for violating the law. In Trumps case, he was impeached when he didn't even do that much.
Click to expand...

It's all so unfair. I know, I know.
But you know that if anything indictable had been found re. Hillary Clinton she'd be sporting a bright orange jump suit today. The reason she was never indicted is, get ready, you're wrong!
Hell, that investigation was reopened for the umpteenth time a week or so before the election. Loudly reopened. Republicans controlled both houses of Congress and couldn't come up with diddly-squat to charge her with.
Hey, maybe it is a matter of incompetence. Maybe the republicans are even more incompetent than the Democrats. I mean, the Democratic Party is so incapable they lost an election tobTrump fergawdsakes, but the Republicans are so bad, so impossibly inept, that they can't get Hillary Clinton charged. According to your post, that should be a slam-dunk but they can't even get that right.
 
Grand Mal said:
It's all so unfair. I know, I know.
But you know that if anything indictable had been found re. Hillary Clinton she'd be sporting a bright orange jump suit today. The reason she was never indicted is, get ready, you're wrong!
Hell, that investigation was reopened for the umpteenth time a week or so before the election. Loudly reopened. Republicans controlled both houses of Congress and couldn't come up with diddly-squat to charge her with.
Hey, maybe it is a matter of incompetence. Maybe the republicans are even more incompetent than the Democrats. I mean, the Democratic Party is so incapable they lost an election tobTrump fergawdsakes, but the Republicans are so bad, so impossibly inept, that they can't get Hillary Clinton charged. According to your post, that should be a slam-dunk but they can't even get that right.
Click to expand...
The word is not unfair. The word is corrupt.

I give you that it is embarrassing for the Obama administration tried to rig the election for Hillary and it still failed.
 
Jay59 said:
The word is not unfair. The word is corrupt.

I give you that it is embarrassing for the Obama administration tried to rig the election for Hillary and it still failed.
Click to expand...

Man, you sure live in a corrupt country, don't you. I mean, the head of your federal police announces, a week or so before the election, that he's reopening an investigation into one of the candidates, an investigation that had half the government and the entire Republican Party spinning it's wheels for years. And now you say a sitting President tried to rig an election? It all sounds kind of Balkan or Central American, know what I mean?
 
Grand Mal said:
Man, you sure live in a corrupt country, don't you. I mean, the head of your federal police announces, a week or so before the election, that he's reopening an investigation into one of the candidates, an investigation that had half the government and the entire Republican Party spinning it's wheels for years. And now you say a sitting President tried to rig an election? It all sounds kind of Balkan or Central American, know what I mean?
Click to expand...
We will see how things go down in the coming year. However, it looks like there was criminal activity by more than one of the top officials in FBI, CIA, NSA, DoJ. Fortunately, it seems largely confined to a few at the very top and some lackeys. Drain some more of the swamp.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom