Kevin McCarthy torches Dems' impeachment push: Nadler is 'inept' and Schiff is a 'liar'

McCarthy is a clown car demagogue.

Michael Cole said:

Nah. Pure sativa. A hybrid would have produced half as many paragraphs.

Click to expand...

TOUCHE!

:lamo

Paradoxical said:

I'm glad you enjoyed it. A good read is when it has loads of truth mixed with jokes, and Schiff is the biggest one of all. He reminds me of the kid in class who never quite fit in. You knew he always wanted to be involved in the activities of normal kids buty would always be off in a corner watching because he knew he was an oaf and a cheat and a fraud and always got caught. Schiff has been "caught" by the Republicans who know he will never testify and why they sent a proxy attorney who got that job because he donate hundreds of thousands of dollars to them. Makes one wonder how much the DNC is paying this guy to help them assassinate Trump.

The impeachment is OVER folks. Done, finished, kaput. They know it will not even go to trial and they are really breathing a sigh of relief because they would be exposed as the frauds they are when Biden and Schiff and the whistle blower refuse to testify.

Click to expand...

Jonsa said:

Click to expand...

Once again, no refutations. I have grown to expect nothing less from this crowd. I presume that before now you had these threads all to yourselves and spent the day patting each other on the back.

SLC said:

Link or it didn't happen.

Click to expand...

Apparently, your disinformation-bubble so damned tight that you didn't know about this. Sad.

Deuce said:

Republicans down to literally just namecalling. It's sad.

Click to expand...

That's all their base is capable of, look at the constant flood of stupidity on display from the right.

Paradoxical said:

Once again, no refutations. I have grown to expect nothing less from this crowd. I presume that before now you had these threads all to yourselves and spent the day patting each other on the back.

Click to expand...

You should expect nothing less from this crowd since refuting absolute nonsense is the pursuit of fools.

Paradoxical said:

Why would he have to when he said it many times before and your side lacks even a smidgeon of evidence?

The impeachment thingy is over. Think Schiff would testify in a Senate trial? How will it look when your leader Herr Schiff refuses? LOL

Click to expand...

You think your Dear Fuehrer will agree to testify in his OWN DEFENSE? I for one would pay good money to see that.

Jonsa said:

You should expect nothing less from this crowd since refuting absolute nonsense is the pursuit of fools.

Click to expand...

That won't stop me from trying to refute the nonsense of the resident leftist progressives. I still get a kick out of destroying their weak arguments and the hope is that one day that their one bari cell may split and make two, But my worry is that it will still be 1/2 plus 1.2 still equals only one. Kinda like Schiff saying two plus two equals four and being destroyed when someone had to tell him that two assumptions and two presumptions still do not equal one fact. I get a thrill out of that deer-in-the-headlights look from progressives who think they are hot stuff.

Paradoxical said:

That won't stop me from trying to refute the nonsense of the resident leftist progressives. I still get a kick out of destroying their weak arguments and the hope is that one day that their one bari cell may split and make two, But my worry is that it will still be 1/2 plus 1.2 still equals only one. Kinda like Schiff saying two plus two equals four and being destroyed when someone had to tell him that two assumptions and two presumptions still do not equal one fact. I get a thrill out of that deer-in-the-headlights look from progressives who think they are hot stuff.

Click to expand...

I am aware of the kind of personality that revels in shadenfreude. How unsurprising you are one of them.

Jonsa said:

You think your Dear Fuehrer will agree to testify in his OWN DEFENSE? I for one would pay good money to see that.

Click to expand...

Nothing to testify about invented scenarios. You see, Jonsa, people can make all manner of wild claims such as having a vision of Jesus on the road to Damascus and many people will believe that just because he made that claim and they want to believe. Where the rubber meets the road in Damascus is when he is asked "Prove it" and that's when I like that customary deer-in-the headlights silent wise eyed stare that I know I am getting by the readers.

Jonsa said:

I am aware of the kind of personality that revels in shadenfreude. How unsurprising you are one of them.

Click to expand...

I never get pleasure in another's misfortune. Ony in proving them wrong so that they may have a little introspection and do some further research.

OscarLevant said:

FYI, to make headlines clear, when you post, go back to the edit function, click the "go advanced button", and replace the jibberish characters manually with the correct characters (it only takes a few seconds), then save the edit, and the jibberish characters will display correctly. The problem occurs something to do with unicode issues when copy and pasting, or something like that. I dunno.

McCarthy knows better than to cast aspersions on fellow members of the Senate and Congress. It's okay to disagree, but to call a fellow "liar" is beyond the pale

Click to expand...

not when they are lying. Telling the truth is not casting aspersions.

If ****ty schiff doesn't want to be called a liar then he needs to stop lying act with some ethics and admit he is full of ****.

[QUOTE
Moreover, he provided no evidence that Schiff physically met with the WB. If anything is being revealed, it is the poor character of McCarthy. [/QUOTE]

his entire staff met with the confirmed leftist hack whistleblower. Of course schiff knows who it is.

The Mueller Report revealed that there were over 127 documented instances of contact between Russia and Trump and his staff, one can hardly conclude that as "dubious".

Click to expand...

The mueller report also confirmed there was no conspiracy fraud or conspiracy to commit fraud or that there was any evidence that trump was working in conjunction with the russian.

You should actually try reading facts instead of leftist blogs.

OscarLevant said:

FYI, to make headlines clear, when you post, go back to the edit function, click the "go advanced button", and replace the jibberish characters manually with the correct characters (it only takes a few seconds), then save the edit, and the jibberish characters will display correctly. The problem occurs something to do with unicode issues when copy and pasting, or something like that. I dunno.

McCarthy knows better than to cast aspersions on fellow members of the Senate and Congress. It's okay to disagree, but to call a fellow "liar" is beyond the pale


Moreover, he provided no evidence that Schiff physically met with the WB. If anything is being revealed, it is the poor character of McCarthy.

The Mueller Report revealed that there were over 127 documented instances of contact between Russia and Trump and his staff, one can hardly conclude that as "dubious".

Click to expand...

Trying to imply that contact between Russia and Trump as bad, is complete liberal bull****! Okay, look buddy, it's totally normal and the Mueller report found nothing nefarious going on; not a goddamn thing! Schifty and Humpty Dumpty are sniveling boobs of the worst kind. I wonder if they receive their paychecks from Soros this week. Those two are prime examples of what's wrong in Washington DC, and exactly why Trump got elected. Trump isn't a threat to our republic; he's a threat to Democrats. You know you're going to lose in 2020, because the clowns you picked for presidential candidates have zero gravitas. You got Biden and Sanders. Good luck. :lol:

American said:

Trying to imply that contact between Russia and Trump as bad, is complete liberal bull****! Okay, look buddy, it's totally normal

Click to expand...

The Mueller report documents at least 127 contacts with Russia. That's hardly normal. Name one other presidential campaign that had anywhere near that many contacts.

and the Mueller report found nothing nefarious going on; not a goddamn thing!

Click to expand...

Not a goddamn thing, eh? A total of thirty-four individuals and three companies indicted by Mueller's investigators. Eight have pleaded guilty to or been convicted of felonies, including five Trump associates and campaign officials.

Schifty and Humpty Dumpty are sniveling boobs of the worst kind. I wonder if they receive their paychecks from Soros this week. Those two are prime examples of what's wrong in Washington DC, and exactly why Trump got elected. Trump isn't a threat to our republic; he's a threat to Democrats. You know you're going to lose in 2020, because the clowns you picked for presidential candidates have zero gravitas. You got Biden and Sanders. Good luck. :lol:

Click to expand...

Trump is, indeed, a threat to both democracy in general, and US National Security.

127 documented incidents of contact with russia crushes the notion that there was no collusion.

But, collusion is not a crime, conspiracy is. In those 127 contacts, Mueller could not establish to a level worthy of indictment any conspiracy to aid and abet Russia's 2016 election interference compaign.

Mueller, in his report, stated that he could not exonerate Trump of Obstruction Of Justice, for which he gave 10 examples, spelled out in detail how they conformed to Obstruction statutes, of which at least 4, according to a number of legal experts, are slam dunk obstruction cases.

You see, there are three possible outcomes for any investigation whereupon the investigation is successful: exoneration, or confirmation of crimes and misconduct, OR combinations of any of these.

All of these outcomes equal a successful outcome for an investigation.

The issue is predication for the investigation, and if you have a problem with predication for the appointment of the SC, direct your attention to Rosenstein.


Trump was elected by two things:

1. A fluke of the EC system (although it was intended to give more strength to the smaller states, it was never intended to allow for a minority to win )

2. Interstate Crosscheck, a program created by Kris Kobach, who partnered with 29 red states, which purged 1.1 million names from voter registration rolls whereby the program's design was biased against minorities.


As for 'losing' the next election, note that Trump only won by the very slim margin 6/10ths of one percent of the total votes cast, plus losing the popular vote by almost tree million votes, and now we have a history of his gross misconduct, therefore it is not logical to assert that his reelection is assured. Remember, close call votes are always decided by the independent middle.

Dems nominated a weak candidate in 2016, and she still won the popular vote by 3 million. With a stronger candidate, we can win by a lot more than three million and easily overcome any deficits of the EC system which tend to favor republicans in close call votes.