Oh, my they also get paid then with inflation adjusted dollars and regardless they have a choice on what to spend their money on which is why tax cuts work for the American people not the liberal bureaucrats that you want to support
You just don't get it thus making this discussion worthless, how about answering the question that no one else will, why your loyalty to Obama and the democratic party? Trump was indeed rejected IN CALIFORNIA not nationwide but that reality again escapes you.
Regarding the loss of the House, a couple issues, first Trump's approval rating on the economy in 2018 wasn't over 50%, two, Democrats won over 40 seats but in 2010 Republicans won over 60 seats, didn't see you even discussing that in 2010. third losing 4 million votes in his re-election is significant since no President in history has ever lost re-election with fewer votes than the original election!!
As for the economic upturn again I don't see any dollar growth that supports your claims but then your claims never have to be supported by you or anyone else as your loyalty has no bounds.
MY BEA figures are in the thread about the 266.000 jobs created in November along with the link. Suggest you learn how to use data in context!
“Oh, my they also get paid then with inflation adjusted dollars and regardless they have a choice on what to spend their money on which is why tax cuts work for the American people not the liberal bureaucrats that you want to support”
I can show you how the Trump tax plan helped the rich and large corps. You can’t show me how the average American got much at all. Not their fair share of the pie. You can’t. You have no evidence of any significant tax cut for the avg American.
“You just don't get it thus making this discussion worthless, how about answering the question that no one else will, why your loyalty to Obama and the democratic party?”
Because the Dems and Obama do more for the average American than the Reps and the likes of Trump.
“Trump was indeed rejected IN CALIFORNIA not nationwide but that reality again escapes you.”
I’ve posted numerous times that 4M of the 3M votes Hillary won in the popular vote came from California alone and that w/o that Trump would have won the popular vote by 1M. I think it escapes many people, but not me.
“Trump's approval rating on the economy in 2018 wasn't over 50%”
And has never been over 50% overall. And the election is still 2 mos away. So your comparison is out of sync.
“Democrats won over 40 seats but in 2010 Republicans won over 60 seats”
Thanks to the GW Bush economy.
“no President in history has ever lost re-election with fewer votes than the original election!!”
I really don’t know what you’re trying to say here. It’s an inept statement. Maybe you meant to say something else. Can’t imagine what, but…
“As for the economic upturn again I don't see any dollar growth that supports your claims but then your claims never have to be supported by you or anyone else as your loyalty has no bounds.”
Obama took over a NEGATIVE growth economy that the Great Recession took down even further in 2009. Your falsehood has no bounds.
“MY BEA figures are in the thread about the 266.000 jobs created in November along with the link. Suggest you learn how to use data in context!”
I wasn’t commenting on your job figures which your posting of had nothing to do with my post. Your wrong figures were that of GDP. Suggest you learn to not use data out of context.
You’ve gone down this idiotic road of pretending things are something they are not before, a mark of disingenuity and prevarication that is all about your debate style. There is no sense in continuing entertaining your falsehood.