• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Jonathan Turley 'inundated with threatening messages' after testimony opposing Trump impeachment

Moot said:
Comparing Clinton's impeachment to Trump's is a false equivalence. 'Clinton didn’t use the power of the presidency to try to extract valuable help for his re-election campaign from a foreign leader & endangering our national security to do so.'
Click to expand...
Neither did Trump.
 
ocean515 said:
Schiff and every member of his staff, the whistleblower, Joe and Hunter Biden, Brennen, Pelosi, Nadler, …..

So yes, force all of them to testify.
Click to expand...
Absolutely we need to unravel this cabal.
 
Moot said:
That's exactly what he did...comrade.
Click to expand...
Your comrade is Putin. And no Trump didn't. Clinton on the other hand suborned perjury and committed perjury himself. Both are felonies. In fact he was charged with 11 different felonies.

Article I charged that Clinton lied to the grand jury concerning:[27]

the nature and details of his relationship with Lewinsky
prior false statements he made in the Jones deposition
prior false statements he allowed his lawyer to make characterizing Lewinsky's affidavit
his attempts to tamper with witnesses
Article II charged Clinton with attempting to obstruct justice in the Jones case by:[28]

encouraging Lewinsky to file a false affidavit
encouraging Lewinsky to give false testimony if and when she was called to testify
concealing gifts he had given to Lewinsky that had been subpoenaed
attempting to secure a job for Lewinsky to influence her testimony
permitting his lawyer to make false statements characterizing Lewinsky's affidavit
attempting to tamper with the possible testimony of his secretary Betty Currie
making false and misleading statements to potential grand jury witnesses
 
ocean515 said:
Schiff and every member of his staff, the whistleblower, Joe and Hunter Biden, Brennen, Pelosi, Nadler, …..

So yes, force all of them to testify.
Click to expand...

Why?

I think Rudy, Mulvaney and Bolton would be more interesting. Since we.are willing to force people to testify i believe these guys should go first.
 
Page 24 and not one person here can say what the threats were, how many there were and who made them.

What's fueling this thread?
 
ClaraD said:
No, it's called the right are hypocrites. Its okay as long as its Trump an Co doing it. It's not so ok when its supposedly happening to Republicans. I'm not justifying the threats, many of you justified Trump calling Nazis good people
Click to expand...
Clara that is classic whataboutism.
 
ClaraD said:
No, it's called the right are hypocrites. Its okay as long as its Trump an Co doing it. It's not so ok when its supposedly happening to Republicans. I'm not justifying the threats, many of you justified Trump calling Nazis good people
Click to expand...

Maybe the delusional post of the thread? If not pretty close! :peace
 
Turley called out Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., for his "heated attacks" after Swalwell tried to use the professor's prior record as the attorney for Judge Thomas Porteous, who was impeached and removed from office in December 2010, against him.

He also criticized the negative news coverage of his testimony, writing that MSNBC's Rachel Maddow and Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank "attack[ed] my credibility."

Jonathan Turley '''inundated with threatening messages''' after testimony opposing Trump impeachment | Fox News
 
Cardinal said:
Page 24 and not one person here can say what the threats were, how many there were and who made them.

What's fueling this thread?
Click to expand...

Page 24 and you still haven't proved he is lying.
Go figure on that one.
 
Common Sense 1 said:
Turley called out Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., for his "heated attacks" after Swalwell tried to use the professor's prior record as the attorney for Judge Thomas Porteous, who was impeached and removed from office in December 2010, against him.

He also criticized the negative news coverage of his testimony, writing that MSNBC's Rachel Maddow and Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank "attack[ed] my credibility."

Jonathan Turley '''inundated with threatening messages''' after testimony opposing Trump impeachment | Fox News
Click to expand...

That is all the leftist slum dogs have.
 
Great job professor Turley


Turley: Democrats offering passion over proof in Trump impeachment

Turley: Democrats offering passion over proof in Trump impeachment | TheHill

My objection is not that you cannot impeach Trump for abuse of power but that this record is comparably thin compared to past impeachments and contains conflicts, contradictions, and gaps including various witnesses not subpoenaed. I suggested that Democrats drop the arbitrary schedule of a vote by the end of December and complete their case and this record before voting on any articles of impeachment. In my view, they have not proven abuse of power in this incomplete record.
 
Cardinal said:
What are the threats?
Click to expand...

That is what I thought. He isn't lying.
You can't prove he is.

Typical leftist hand waving.
Denial fallacies are no longer valid.
 
roughdraft274 said:
Did you forget that Justin amash was booted from the Republican party dared to break ranks?

My point was valid. It just went over your head apparently.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

And now another example.
 
Moot said:
I'm sure he's very nice man...but he's also a flip flopper and seems to have double standards on impeachment which makes his testimony largely irrelevant.


For Clinton's impeachment he said this..."While there's a high bar for what constitutes grounds for impeachment, an offense does not have to be indictable. Serious misconduct or a violation of public trust is enough."

But for Trump's impeachment he said this..."I am concerned about lowering impeachment standards ... This impeachment would stand out among modern impeachments as the shortest proceeding, with the thinnest evidentiary record and the narrowest grounds ever used to impeach a president."


Of course, he didn't need any evidence to push for Clinton's impeachment...but now he does for Trump....even though there is lot more evidence against Trump than there was against Clinton...or Nixon for that matter.
Click to expand...
NO EVIDENCE??? What planet do you live on?:confused:

Article I charged that Clinton lied to the grand jury concerning:[27]

the nature and details of his relationship with Lewinsky
prior false statements he made in the Jones deposition
prior false statements he allowed his lawyer to make characterizing Lewinsky's affidavit
his attempts to tamper with witnesses


Article II charged Clinton with attempting to obstruct justice in the Jones case by:[28]

encouraging Lewinsky to file a false affidavit
encouraging Lewinsky to give false testimony if and when she was called to testify
concealing gifts he had given to Lewinsky that had been subpoenaed
attempting to secure a job for Lewinsky to influence her testimony
permitting his lawyer to make false statements characterizing Lewinsky's affidavit
attempting to tamper with the possible testimony of his secretary Betty Currie
making false and misleading statements to potential grand jury witnesses
Click to expand...
Impeachment of Bill Clinton - Wikipedia
 
rickc said:
Why?

I think Rudy, Mulvaney and Bolton would be more interesting. Since we.are willing to force people to testify i believe these guys should go first.
Click to expand...

Why?

Schiff orchestrated this whole thing. The plant from the CIA went to Schiff first, before filing the complaint. Schiff, and the House leadership, are ground zero to this coup attempt.

I don't care what order people go in. Schiff and the rest of his cabal must be put on the witness stand.
 
ocean515 said:
Why?

Schiff orchestrated this whole thing. The plant from the CIA went to Schiff first, before filing the complaint. Schiff, and the House leadership, are ground zero to this coup attempt.

I don't care what order people go in. Schiff and the rest of his cabal must be put on the witness stand.
Click to expand...

The Democrats, especially piece of Schiff, are a real piece of work.

Scalise: Schiff 'spying' on Nunes with call records
[url]https://www.washingtonexaminer.com › news › congress › scalise-schiff-sp...[/URL]
2 days ago - House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff spied on the top Republican on his panel by obtaining his phone records and publishing them in an impeachment report, Minority Whip Steve Scalise said Wednesday. ... “I want to know all the people Adam Schiff is spying on,” Scalise ...
​

I thought it was in the Bill of Rights about unlawful search and seizure?

The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides that "[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/fourth_amendment
Click to expand...

Once again, accusation of others destroying the constitution when they themselves are guilty of the same.

What is it with Democrats and their use of federal LEO and Intel agencies used as political weapons? Seems they can't break themselves of the habit. They certainly shouldn't be elected to office because of this habit of theirs.
 
eohrnberger said:
The Democrats, especially piece of Schiff, are a real piece of work.

Scalise: Schiff 'spying' on Nunes with call records
[url]https://www.washingtonexaminer.com › news › congress › scalise-schiff-sp...[/URL]
2 days ago - House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff spied on the top Republican on his panel by obtaining his phone records and publishing them in an impeachment report, Minority Whip Steve Scalise said Wednesday. ... “I want to know all the people Adam Schiff is spying on,” Scalise ...
​

I thought it was in the Bill of Rights about unlawful search and seizure?



Once again, accusation of others destroying the constitution when they themselves are guilty of the same.

What is it with Democrats and their use of federal LEO and Intel agencies used as political weapons? Seems they can't break themselves of the habit. They certainly shouldn't be elected to office because of this habit of theirs.
Click to expand...

The actions of the House leadership, their attempt to stage a unilateral coup to remove the duly elected President of the United States, and their partnering with the most powerful intelligence agencies in the world ought to send chills down the spine of every Citizen in the United States.

It has been helpful that the Democrats have been providing content for GOP political campaign advertising every day, so that these facts can be broadcast into every home across the US next year.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom