• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Republicans issue 123-page defense of Trump ahead of Democrats’ impeachment report

Oborosen said:
I don't expect you to walk me through anything, at least not honestly. I've been dealing with your camp long enough to know that I legitimately can't trust either of you to do something like that.

Which is why I don't trust it when you just repeatedly say that it's fake, simply because you don't like it.

So I'm just going to say that you're lying about it being fake. Which means, going by your own rules, that you are indeed lying.
Click to expand...

We already went over that, Oborosen. It's not fake because I said it is. It's fake because it's based on fake, misproven, and unproven information. But by all means, please keep repeating yourself. You're really onto something here.
 
ocean515 said:
And here you are. I'm amused that I'm able to waste more of your precious life so easily. :lamo
Click to expand...

Are you? Glad I could being some amusement to your day. ;)
 
ocean515 said:
And here you are. I'm amused that I'm able to waste more of your precious life so easily. :lamo
Click to expand...

Thank goodness you are not really really into equality and proclaim you also don't mind draining him of his precious bodily fluids either; every last drop.
 
danielpalos said:
Thank goodness you are not really really into equality and proclaim you also don't mind draining him of his precious bodily fluids either; every last drop.
Click to expand...

Thank goodness your opinion means nothing, so I guess you've wasted some of your precious life as well.
 
OpportunityCost said:
It is disingenuous that none of you have read what has been drafted but already know its bad in whatever way. You are being led around and being told what to think about it before its available to the public.
Click to expand...

Spoil it for me, since you have read it.
 
OpportunityCost said:
It is disingenuous that none of you have read what has been drafted but already know its bad in whatever way. You are being led around and being told what to think about it before its available to the public.
Click to expand...

Iv'e read it, and its an embarrassing whiny little bitch defense with outrageous accusations,conspiracy, misrepresentations, deflection, credibility squirrels. Little or no actual rebuttal of evidence.

Classic Nunes bull****. But I get how some people might be led around being told what is actually in it so they can immediately dismiss the majority report. After all that is what it was written for, no?
 
I wonder why they did not reveal all this exculpatory evidence during the hearings. Or maybe they did and no one bought their baloney so they repackaged it.
 
Jonsa said:
Iv'e read it, and its an embarrassing whiny little bitch defense with outrageous accusations,conspiracy, misrepresentations, deflection, credibility squirrels. Little or no actual rebuttal of evidence.

Classic Nunes bull****. But I get how some people might be led around being told what is actually in it so they can immediately dismiss the majority report. After all that is what it was written for, no?
Click to expand...

LOL, with your characterizations and lack of in depth thought about it, why should I answer you?
 
OpportunityCost said:
LOL, with your characterizations and lack of in depth thought about it, why should I answer you?
Click to expand...


I totally agree that the minority report "Lacked indepth thought" with its bull**** mental contortions, whiny little bitch flimsy process objections, mischaracterizations and logical fallacies.

Meanwhile it turns out Nunes was talking to all kinds of people involved including indicted foreign nationals about wild arsed conspiracy theories and demands for investigations WHILE he was so self righteously attempted to slime as nothing more than partisan butt hurt.

I don't expect an any meaningful answer from you because you can't argue the facts. You can only present bogus process arguments, while spouting whatbout debunked conspiracy theories, and laughably trying to pin sincere ethical concerns on the part of Dear Leader for his criminal behaviors.
 
Jonsa said:
I totally agree that the minority report "Lacked indepth thought" with its bull**** mental contortions, whiny little bitch flimsy process objections, mischaracterizations and logical fallacies.

Meanwhile it turns out Nunes was talking to all kinds of people involved including indicted foreign nationals about wild arsed conspiracy theories and demands for investigations WHILE he was so self righteously attempted to slime as nothing more than partisan butt hurt.

I don't expect an any meaningful answer from you because you can't argue the facts. You can only present bogus process arguments, while spouting whatbout debunked conspiracy theories, and laughably trying to pin sincere ethical concerns on the part of Dear Leader for his criminal behaviors.
Click to expand...

I sense much butthurt, still not over the Mueller report are you?
 
OpportunityCost said:
I sense much butthurt, still not over the Mueller report are you?
Click to expand...

As I suspected no meaningful answer because you can't argue the facts. I see your sense is as faulty as your logic and as empty as your facts.
 
marke said:
Those are democrat Christians. Study your history. I don't subscribe to democrat Christian doctrines and interpretations. I never have.
Click to expand...

They are Conservatives, which left the Democrat party in the 1960's and became Republicans. They are not Democrats marching, they are racist marching. Yes, they were once "States-Rights" democrats, which early in the 20th century was a euphemism for racism. But the Democratic party in the 1960;s moved away from this nonsense and these racists have found safe harbor with the Republicans, which have provided safe-harbor for racists for 50 years. Now, under Trump, the harbor is not only safe, its a 24/7 party. Study your history. See also Strom Thurmond.

Strom Thurmond - Wikipedia
 
Last edited:
OpportunityCost said:
I sense much butthurt, still not over the Mueller report are you?
Click to expand...

Most Cultists completely miss the point, which I am sure is not an accident but part of the design. According to John Kelly, Trump refused to use secure communications. Why is that?

I know. He did it so that his calls could be hidden from Americans, even if doing so exposed him to foreign intelligence agencies. That is some impeachable **** right there.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom