• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Melania Trump suspects Roger Stone behind nude photo leak, book claims

Hmmm...what set of nude pictures is she talking about?

She had already done a very racy set for the British GQ magazine:
Melania Trump topless, nude photo shoot | British GQ

Then there was lesbian shoot in the 90's and a lesbians BDSM shoot where some of those pics surfaced in Max Magazine:
Melania Trump’s girl-on-girl photos from racy shoot revealed

When asked, Trump said: "“Melania was one of the most successful models, and she did many photo shoots, including for covers and major magazines. This was a picture taken for a European magazine prior to my knowing Melania. In Europe, pictures like this are very fashionable and common.”

What I find ironic is that the right was very vocal in their disapproval of what Michelle Obama wore...yet are silent on what Melania Trump didn't wear and who she was naked with....

"fashionable and COMMON"
he got it half right
 
I saw what Don Jr et al did there in that meeting, and I saw plenty of other things like Trump standing on the stage in Helsinki, and his taking the kids away. That there was insufficient evidence or DOJ policy not allowing Trump to see justice matters not to me. I judge with my own eyes and ears, DOJ non-prosecution policy be damned. And yes, I still believe Trump will face charges after his Presidential immunity expires.

But this is not only about the "no crimes" argument that many Trump supporters hang their hats on. I saw Trump bring a foreign power into our electoral process. There nothing that can justify that. Nor can anyone justify Trump taking and keeping those kids. So hang your hat on the lack of prosecutor evidence or immunity to being prosecuted using criminal statute, because that's all you've got. And you, just like I, saw Melania's jacket when she went to see those kids. There's a reason 1/2 the country wants Trump impeached and removed. Half the country! Think about that.

now if we can just get them to show up and vote in 2020
 
Textbook example of someone lacking self-awareness.

I hope you didn't buy that textbook new, because it sounds like you got ripped off.
 
Here is what all Christians and non-Christians alike should consider:

9. Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,
10. Nor thieves, not covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. 1 Corinthians 6.
Yet, you support Trump, who is a "fornicator", adulterer, thief and extorter.

What is remarkable is that conservatives are still placing blame for all our social ills on the decline of religiosity and its supposed destruction of traditional family values, despite decades of evidence that this whole line of argument was and is totally wrong.

In October, William Barr’s made a speech denouncing “militant secularists” for destroying American society. There were several striking things about this speech. It was much more partisan than we used to expect from the attorney general, who is after all supposed to serve the nation, not just the president and his party. It also seemed well over the line in violating the separation between church and state.

What really struck me, however, was that Barr seems to be stuck in a time warp, repeating claims about family values and social order that were standard right-wing fare a generation ago but have since been utterly refuted by experience.

Back in the mid-1990s, conservatives pointed to two trends -- the decline of traditional families and rising crime -- and insisted that the first had caused the second. For example, The Heritage Foundation put out a report titled “The Real Root Causes of Violent Crime: The Breakdown of Marriage, Family, and Community.” The report ridiculed claims that rising crime and social breakdown had something to do with declining economic opportunity, and suggested among other things that the reduced influence of organized religion was one of the causes of declining family values.

Some people on the right went even further, arguing, for example, that mass shootings were happening because we were teaching children the theory of evolution -- a claim you still see sometimes. Pat Robertson even blamed 9/11 on lowered levels of religiousness.

Since then, however, a few things have happened. Traditional families have continued to decline in relative importance: fewer than half of American children now live with two parents in their first marriage. What has happened to violent crime? It has plunged.

And while new social problems have emerged, above all the surge in deaths of despair, opioids, etc. they have mainly manifested not among inner-city blacks but among rural and small-town whites -- and are heavily concentrated in places that have suffered, yes, a decline in economic opportunity. Where are some of the worst-hit states? They happen to be among the states where an unusually large number of people say that they are “highly religious.”

We might also note that other advanced countries are, without exception, less religious than America, and some places have gone even further than we have in moving away from traditional family structure -- but crime is far lower, and there’s nothing like our surge in deaths of despair.

Overall, experience since the 1990s has completely refuted the God-and-family-values theory of American social problems.
 
Yet, you support Trump, who is a "fornicator", adulterer, thief and extorter.


Democrats promote ungodliness and immorality. They only criticize Trump hoping to persuade gullible Christians not to vote for him so their wicked fornicating baby-killing socialist atheist can stand a chance of getting elected instead.
 
Democrats promote ungodliness and immorality. They only criticize Trump hoping to persuade gullible Christians not to vote for him so their wicked fornicating baby-killing socialist atheist can stand a chance of getting elected instead.

surely you can come up with more adjectives than that paltry list!
 
Democrats promote ungodliness and immorality. They only criticize Trump hoping to persuade gullible Christians not to vote for him so their wicked fornicating baby-killing socialist atheist can stand a chance of getting elected instead.

What's wrong with being a wicked fornicating baby-killing socialist atheist? After all, you did elect one president.
 
Democrats promote ungodliness and immorality. They only criticize Trump hoping to persuade gullible Christians not to vote for him so their wicked fornicating baby-killing socialist atheist can stand a chance of getting elected instead.

Fornicators! Mass Hysteria! Human sacrifice! Cats and Dogs Living Together! OK, I hear you. This can’t be argued on rational grounds. I think that if you must stoop to the low argument that Democrats just aren't as moral or Godly as much as you, to defend a president who clearly has obstructed justice; obstructed Congress; a pattern of abusing his office; emolument violations, etc., you are admitting that you have no substantive or worldly defense.
 
Fornicators! Mass Hysteria! Human sacrifice! Cats and Dogs Living Together! OK, I hear you. This can’t be argued on rational grounds. I think that if you must stoop to the low argument that Democrats just aren't as moral or Godly as much as you, to defend a president who clearly has obstructed justice; obstructed Congress; a pattern of abusing his office; emolument violations, etc., you are admitting that you have no substantive or worldly defense.

Not to mention that the president is also a wicked fornicating baby-killing socialist atheist who figured out how to manipulate stupid people into thinking he is not.
 
that's real hilarious, yeah. But you didn't mind at all when obama hired a tax evader to run the treasury.

obama!! I cant stop thinking about obama! Even in a thread about the first lady's tits i think about obama!
 
Democrats have been questioning why they are not connecting with the uncommitted voters. Reading this thread tells us why. No one reasonable wants to be associated with ankle biting gutter snipes.

Is that why they lost the midterms? Is that why they won most of the special elections? Is that why they ousted Republican governors and overturned the Republican majorities in many states?

Actually, no one reasonable wants to be associated with a lying ankle biting gutter snipe like Trump.
 
Is that why they lost the midterms? Is that why they won most of the special elections? Is that why they ousted Republican governors and overturned the Republican majorities in many states?

Actually, no one reasonable wants to be associated with a lying ankle biting gutter snipe like Trump.

Watch Trump get reelected, and enjoy your whine.
 
As it should be. I am with you on that. My wife it the most beautiful for me too.

is she still looking over your shoulder as you are typing?
 
Watch Trump get reelected, and enjoy your whine.

Watch him not and you go into full meltdown. Hey, maybe Trump can then resurrect his complaints about the Electoral College like he did after the 2012 election.
 
The fact that people are allowed to get away with making fake pictures like this of our First lady is disgusting. I hope the President is made aware of this and starts rounding these people up.

for what offense ... other than offending him?
 
Watch Trump get reelected, and enjoy your whine.

What a profound post.

I don't whine. You're confusing me for your friends at the Trump Fan Club meeting who are tinking in their panties about the mean old Libruls being mean to the Donald and his wife.
 
What a profound post.

I don't whine. You're confusing me for your friends at the Trump Fan Club meeting who are tinking in their panties about the mean old Libruls being mean to the Donald and his wife.

You're whining already.
 
Fornicators! Mass Hysteria! Human sacrifice! Cats and Dogs Living Together! OK, I hear you. This can’t be argued on rational grounds. I think that if you must stoop to the low argument that Democrats just aren't as moral or Godly as much as you, to defend a president who clearly has obstructed justice; obstructed Congress; a pattern of abusing his office; emolument violations, etc., you are admitting that you have no substantive or worldly defense.

When it comes to adultery, how would you rank these 4 presidents according to sleaziness?

1. JFK
2. LBJ
3. Bill Clinton
4. Donald Trump

Which president was not known for committing adultery while in office?
 
You're whining already.

I'm not whining. I enjoy watching the entire Trump clan get embarrassed on the international stage.

Except for poor Tiffany. Bad enough her disgusting father wanted to abort her, but when his personal assistant the "beautiful beauty" got sloshed and told the reporters how Trump doesn't even want to get photographed with her because he thinks she's unattractive. Her I feel sorry for.

Watching Trump panic in public has been amusing. The only amusement in an otherwise vulgar time where we have a lying fraud in the Oval Office and millions of idiots who would continue to support him even if he committed murder in broad daylight, as he bragged about when he himself realized just how ignorant his base is.
 
When it comes to adultery, how would you rank these 4 presidents according to sleaziness?

1. JFK
2. LBJ
3. Bill Clinton
4. Donald Trump

Which president was not known for committing adultery while in office?

Barack Obama. George W. Bush. George HW Bush. Jimmy Carter. You know - all the people your savior Trump tells you you're supposed to hate. Oh, and Reagan didn't either.

Good plan ignoring them and going back almost 60 years to Kennedy. You do know he died in 1963 and isn't around to hurt you anymore, yes?
 
I'm not whining. I enjoy watching the entire Trump clan get embarrassed on the international stage.

Except for poor Tiffany. Bad enough her disgusting father wanted to abort her, but when his personal assistant the "beautiful beauty" got sloshed and told the reporters how Trump doesn't even want to get photographed with her because he thinks she's unattractive. Her I feel sorry for.

Watching Trump panic in public has been amusing. The only amusement in an otherwise vulgar time where we have a lying fraud in the Oval Office and millions of idiots who would continue to support him even if he committed murder in broad daylight, as he bragged about when he himself realized just how ignorant his base is.

Whine, whine, whine. Meanwhile he gets reelected, the circus continues.

He promised during his campaign to bring chaos. He has delivered, and in doing so made himself into the democrat's great white whale. We all know how that story ended.
 
Back
Top Bottom