• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ukraine’s Zelensky again denies quid pro quo during Trump phone call

Grim17

Battle Ready
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 29, 2009
Messages
34,478
Reaction score
17,282
Location
Southwestern U.S.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Whether you believe a quid pro quo took place or not, it seems to me that pursuing this is kind of like accusing a man of rape, when the woman he supposedly raped, says she wasn't raped and they didn't even have sex.

Desperation makes people do the damnedest things.

Ukraine’s Zelensky again denies quid pro quo during Trump phone call


Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky denied once again that President Trump used nearly $400 million in military aid as a bargaining chip to pressure him to launch investigations into former Vice President Joe Biden and Ukraine’s role in the 2016 US election.

“I did not speak with US President Trump in those terms: you give me this, I give you that,” Zelensky told German magazine Der Spiegel in an interview published Monday.

The July 25 phone call between Zelensky and Trump sparked the impeachment inquiry that is underway in the House.

Trump has called the phone call “perfect” and blasted the Democrats’ impeachment effort as a “witch hunt.”

Full Story
 
Whether you believe a quid pro quo took place or not, it seems to me that pursuing this is kind of like accusing a man of rape, when the woman he supposedly raped, says she wasn't raped and they didn't even have sex.

Desperation makes people do the damnedest things.



Full Story

Inaccurate analogy. More like a man being accused of spending time with a hooker and the hooker supporting his denial in hopes of a bigger tip next time.
 
Sigh...

Because they choose not to.

And they will then cling to the fact that the Ukrainian President says there’s nothing wrong and ignore that it’s in his interest and his nations interest to do so.

Because none of whats happening now means that Trump will actually be removed from office and that he will lose the 2020 election and so if he were to confirm it, he inserts himself straight into partisan American politics and can expect a pretty chilly or downright hostile relationship with the White House for another 4 years, something his nation can not afford.

But Trump supporters aren’t really the sharpest tools in the shed and so “nuance” is a concept pretty foreign to them.

And if he said it did happen, you would call him a liar or that it’s only his opinion or that he doesn’t understand the context because English wasn’t his first language or whatever.
 
Inaccurate analogy. More like a man being accused of spending time with a hooker and the hooker supporting his denial in hopes of a bigger tip next time.

So now you are comparing the president of the Ukraine to a prostitute.

Isn't that special.
 
Ok. So where’s his explanation for saying that he is “ready to cooperate.” Cooperate with what?
 
Whether you believe a quid pro quo took place or not, it seems to me that pursuing this is kind of like accusing a man of rape, when the woman he supposedly raped, says she wasn't raped and they didn't even have sex.

Desperation makes people do the damnedest things.



Full Story

It's amusing in a sordid kind of way to watch the anti-Trumps salivate profusely while trying to speak for President Zelensky's motivations.
 
So now you are comparing the president of the Ukraine to a prostitute.

Isn't that special.

True, all he's doing is what politicians do, which is take a position that helps him and his country. It's rational for him to do so, and I don't blame him for it, but we don't have to pretend that's not what's happening.

And it's really a non-denial denial because it only deals with the call itself, and that's a small part of the whole picture.
 
So now you are comparing the president of the Ukraine to a prostitute.

Isn't that special.

And comparing President Trump to a loser who pays for sex. Oh wait, he is a loser who pays for sex.
Now, that's special.
 
True, all he's doing is what politicians do, which is take a position that helps him and his country. It's rational for him to do so, and I don't blame him for it, but we don't have to pretend that's not what's happening.

And it's really a non-denial denial because it only deals with the call itself, and that's a small part of the whole picture.

Oh.. So when Ukraine buckled under the 'blackmail' from Biden..?
That's okay because...
 
And if he said it did happen, you would call him a liar or that it’s only his opinion or that he doesn’t understand the context because English wasn’t his first language or whatever.

You've got this all wrong. I'm not saying Zelensky's telling the truth now, just as I've never said that Trump didn't do what you all accuse him of.

My point is, that as long as Zelensky denies there was a quid pro quo and there is no concrete evidence proving that Trump withheld the aide for something in return, it seems to me it's silly to pursue this.
 
It's amusing in a sordid kind of way to watch the anti-Trumps salivate profusely while trying to speak for President Zelensky's motivations.

We know he's not being forthcoming. During the phone call, we know Z mentioned javelins and Trump asked for a favor first. Trump then mentioned some version of talking with Rudy and/or Barr about a half dozen times on two very specific investigations - Bidens and Crowdstrike, by name. He can say he felt no pressure to do those things, but why would anyone believe him when it's the U.S. asking, while blocking aid of $400 million, and the WH meeting they desperately wanted? If he didn't know then about the block, he's soon learn. He knew he didn't have the funds, and the person controlling them in a rare phone call between the two was very, very, very clear about what HE wanted - investigations into Bidens and Crowdstrike.

If your company's banker is holding your future in its hands and asks for a "favor" while you have a loan pending, of course there's pressure to do those favors, immense pressure. We're supposed to believe something different here? Can you explain why?

We also know that his advisor Yermak understood the pressure, and texted the terms. We know Z had an interview with CNN to announce the investigations as demanded. Whether he understood what was being asked during the phone call isn't all that relevant.
 

If you want to address the OP or my comment, please do. Otherwise, I'm not going to help you derail this thread with topics addressed on other threads. Thanks in advance.

Here's my comment:

"True, all he's doing is what politicians do, which is take a position that helps him and his country. It's rational for him to do so, and I don't blame him for it, but we don't have to pretend that's not what's happening.

And it's really a non-denial denial because it only deals with the call itself, and that's a small part of the whole picture."
 
Of course Trump fanatics see this as a false rape allegation. Trump is the ultimate redpill victim. And there's no actual rape involved, of course. Belittling rape is merely par for the course.

In sum:

1. Trump is a victim.
2. Rape isn't a big deal and is pretty much the same as a congressional investigation.


Like that's not a ****ed up OP.
 
You've got this all wrong. I'm not saying Zelensky's telling the truth now, just as I've never said that Trump didn't do what you all accuse him of.

My point is, that as long as Zelensky denies there was a quid pro quo and there is no concrete evidence proving that Trump withheld the aide for something in return, it seems to me it's silly to pursue this.

That's just not true. As a principle you're asserting that unless one or both parties publicly ADMIT to bribery or extortion, there can be no concrete evidence it happened. It's absurd.
 
So, basically... Trump is a statutory rapist and we're supposed to be okay with that?

The OP is basically, "there's nothing wrong with statutory rape" in which he portrays the victim as denying the crime.
 
So now you are comparing the president of the Ukraine to a prostitute.

Isn't that special.

Ukraine is in a war with Russia. A war it will certainly lose without our support. Do you think a good President would endanger his country by calling the POTUS a criminal or would he lie to save it?
 
You've got this all wrong. I'm not saying Zelensky's telling the truth now, just as I've never said that Trump didn't do what you all accuse him of.

My point is, that as long as Zelensky denies there was a quid pro quo and there is no concrete evidence proving that Trump withheld the aide for something in return, it seems to me it's silly to pursue this.

Besides you know, the time line, the motive, the whistleblower, the transcript and everything else that has come out.

To say there’s nothing is not true.

Then again truth has never been one of your fortes.

When you don’t like someone or something you spend ages going into excruciating detail about everything, when it’s someone from your tribe you’re just like “nah”.
 
Whether you believe a quid pro quo took place or not, it seems to me that pursuing this is kind of like accusing a man of rape, when the woman he supposedly raped, says she wasn't raped and they didn't even have sex.

Desperation makes people do the damnedest things.



Full Story

If one links to the story. then follows where the Post got it, and translate it, here is what Zelensky said:

Selenskyj: I did not talk to US President Trump in that attitude - I'll give it to you, you'll give it to me. That's something I completely miss. That's the way I talked to President Putin - you release these people, we release those people. As for the United States, I do not want us to act like beggars. But you have to realize that we are at war. And if you are our strategic partner then you should not block any help. It's about fairness for me. It's not about a quid pro quo, it's just a story in itself.


Ukraine: Wolodymyr Selenskyj - "Ich will nicht, dass wir wie Bettler wirken" - SPIEGEL ONLINE
 
Whether you believe a quid pro quo took place or not, it seems to me that pursuing this is kind of like accusing a man of rape, when the woman he supposedly raped, says she wasn't raped and they didn't even have sex.

Desperation makes people do the damnedest things.



Full Story



Of course, we all know that given QPQ, Zelensky has absolutely NOTHING to fear of any retribution from Trump should he tell the truth that there was a QPQ.
 
Re: Ukraine’s Zelensky again denies quid pro quo during Trump phone call

Whether you believe a quid pro quo took place or not, it seems to me that pursuing this is kind of like accusing a man of rape, when the woman he supposedly raped, says she wasn't raped and they didn't even have sex.

Desperation makes people do the damnedest things.



Full Story

That's not the "full story". Time Magazine did the interview with Zelensky. Not the Post. So if it's the 'full story' you want then this the link you should've gone to.

Ukraine'''s Volodymyr Zelensky Interview on Trump, Putin | Time

During the interview in his office in Kyiv, the comedian-turned-president denied, as he has done in the past, that he and Trump ever discussed a decision to withhold American aid to Ukraine for nearly two months in the context of a quid pro quo involving political favors, which are now at the center of the impeachment inquiry in Congress.

But he also pushed back on Trump’s recent claims about corruption in Ukraine, and questioned the fairness of Trump’s decision to freeze American aid. “If you’re our strategic partner, then you can’t go blocking anything for us,” he said. “I think that’s just about fairness. It’s not about a quid pro quo.”...

As for the United States, I would really want – and we feel this, it’s true – for them to help us, to understand us, to see that we are a player in our own right, that they cannot make deals about us with anyone behind our backs. Of course they help us, and I’m not just talking about technical help, military aid, financial aid. These are important things, very important things, especially right now, when we are in such a difficult position.

[B]The United States of America is a signal, for the world[/B], for everyone. When America says, for instance, that Ukraine is a corrupt country, that is the hardest of signals. It might seem like an easy thing to say, that combination of words: Ukraine is a corrupt country. Just to say it and that’s it. But it doesn’t end there. Everyone hears that signal. Investments, banks, stakeholders, companies, American, European, companies that have international capital in Ukraine, it’s a signal to them that says, ‘Be careful, don’t invest.’ Or, ‘Get out of there.’ ... This is a hard signal. But that signal from them is very important...

We don’t have influence over the Europeans’ decision. We don’t have it, and that’s it. I don’t have any leverage. I can only count on the strong support that I see on this question from the United States of America.

This interview shows that while Zelensky may be a political novice he is also smart and insightful. I think in that interview he subtly turned the Presidents own words around on him. He spoke about "fairness". "I think that’s just about fairness. It’s not about a quid pro quo.” Which he knows to be one of the President's favorite words and defenses. He also understands the fickleness of American elections and politics and that there is every possibility that he may have to deal with the Trump Presidency for another 4 years. He's shrewd enough to not use the words Trump hates most,"Quid Pro Quo" in talking about the military aid package he deliberately held up and then later released at the last moment. Because Zelensky understands that these "things are very important". Especially at this moment because they are in "such a difficult position".

But he also made it equally clear that guns and bullets alone won't be enough to resolve this conflict. What's more important and vital to reaching a resolution is the "signals" America sends. That the words of the US matter greatly and expressions and symbols of support from the US are even more important than the guns and the bullets we give them. Without it. They "have no leverage". Hence their deep desire for a White House visit or Presidential visit because the symbolism of those things and message they send are so powerful. So in effect Zelensky is saying to tell Trump "to do the right thing", and do what is "fair".
 
So now you are comparing the president of the Ukraine to a prostitute.

Isn't that special.

Taht’s what Trump assumed. And so did Sondland, Guliani and his two Russian elves. Rick Perry obviously though so, because he tried to hold them up for a gas deal. Rick Perry too!

Indeed the entire Trump strategy was based on the assumption that the Ukrainians would pay up.
 
That's just not true. As a principle you're asserting that unless one or both parties publicly ADMIT to bribery or extortion, there can be no concrete evidence it happened. It's absurd.

I asserted nothing of the kind.

There is no concrete evidence and both party's deny the allegation. Simply "believing" it took place just doesn't cut it.
 
Re: Ukraine’s Zelensky again denies quid pro quo during Trump phone call

"I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it."

I quoted the entire sentence because only the 1st part of the sentence is ever quoted.
 
Back
Top Bottom