• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hong Kong protests: China warns US over Human Rights and Democracy Act

Litwin

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 2, 2017
Messages
33,607
Reaction score
5,193
Location
GDL/Sweden
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
we should stop killing of British people by red Hans , Long Live Hong Kong republic

"China has warned the US it could take "firm counter-measures" if Washington continues to show support for pro-democracy protesters in Hong Kong.

The warning came after US President Donald Trump signed the Human Rights and Democracy Act into law.

The act mandates an annual review, to check if Hong Kong has enough autonomy to justify special status with the US.

Mr Trump is currently seeking a deal with China, in order to end a trade war between the two countries."



Hong Kong protests: China warns US over Human Rights and Democracy Act - BBC News
 
Chinese Ministry said:
"It openly backed violent criminals who rampantly smashed facilities, set fire, assaulted innocent civilians, trampled on the rule of law, and jeopardised social order."

Interesting they didn't bother mentioning all of the previously non-violent protests, and also conveniently left out the deaths of peaceful protestors at the hands of the police. As for meddling in Chinese affairs, the law in question is about the a special status the US issues to Hong Kong; that should certainly be within the purview of the US. Beijing can choose to interfere in Hong Kong as much as it likes, but how other nations react is not in Chinese control. I think it's great this bi-partisan bill made it to Trump's desk and that he signed it. I was wondering whether he would given how it could sabotage the trade negotiations.
 
we should stop killing of British people by red Hans , Long Live Hong Kong republic
Hans? Why is everything racial to you? FYI, the majority of people in Hong Kong are also Han.
 
Hans? Why is everything racial to you? FYI, the majority of people in Hong Kong are also Han.

dont you understand that these Brits just don't want to become Muscovites bydlo , the speechless animals at will of the czars and satraps ?

bydlo - Wiktionary
 
Hey, guess what. I support Trump in this.
 
i support the USA in this, its all because USA has powerful democratic institutes

I mean, trump signed the HRDA, let's be fair. That's all I meant. You know, if sane people want to prove that TDS doesn't exist, maybe we shouldn't be afraid of saying 'hey, I agree' when we agree, or we all sound like haters for no reason.

Am I wrong here?
 
I mean, trump signed the HRDA, let's be fair. That's all I meant. You know, if sane people want to prove that TDS doesn't exist, maybe we shouldn't be afraid of saying 'hey, I agree' when we agree, or we all sound like haters for no reason.

Am I wrong here?

i see you point, but still we ´d not forger how and why USA is the greatest state in the history
 
This looks like a situation [Ed.: The on-going US/China trade discussions,] ready made for Mr. Jared Kushner, fresh from his brilliant solving of the Palestine/Israel situation and now assigned to the wall project along the US/Mexico border. He should be reassigned to Beijing post haste.
 
dont you understand that these Brits just don't want to become Muscovites bydlo , the speechless animals at will of the czars and satraps ?

bydlo - Wiktionary

Its clear you dont know what youre talking about klimatis. The British ceded Hong Kong back to China decades ago.
 
Its clear you dont know what youre talking about klimatis. The British ceded Hong Kong back to China decades ago.

what are you talking about ? the hans China is product of 20c. so there no such thing like "back to China "? but you have a point here, UK had no right to ceded British free people to the red hans slavary
 
what are you talking about ? the hans China is product of 20c. so there no such thing like "back to China "? but you have a point here, UK had no right to ceded British free people to the red hans slavary

Oh look, more incoherent raving and ranting.

The British never had the “right” to take Hong Kong in the first place. The people of Hong Kong by and large do not see themselves as British whatsoever, and your babbling about how they are “more British than the “Mongols” is bizarre.
 
you are an old grandpa Stalinist, of cos you will support Marxist satanic fascist anti- christian occupants
Surviving China’s Uighur camps




China’s Vanishing Muslims: Undercover In The Most Dystopian Place In The World

but this is ok for stalinists like you , right? death camps are the your normal way of live

ps traitor i 120% sure that CIA got your IP address already
 
you are an old grandpa Stalinist, of cos you will support Marxist satanic fascist anti- christian occupants







but this is ok for stalinists like you , right? death camps are the your normal way of live

ps traitor i 120% sure that CIA got your IP address already



Unfortunately for you, in the United States you are allowed to have your own opinions and call out unhinged racists from other countries when they start shrieking garbage.

The British had “every right” to return Hong Kong to China. The people of Hong Kong did not want to stay under British control forever—that had been made abundantly clear decades earlier.

“Satanic”

:lamo
 
my advise to you, buy a consultation from a local lawyer as soon as you can

In the United States, there are both federal and state laws prohibiting treason.[1] It was defined in Article III, Section 3 of the United States Constitution. Most state constitutions include similar definitions of treason, specifically limited to levying war against the state, "adhering to the enemies" of the state, or aiding the enemies of the state, and requiring two witnesses or a confession in open court.[2] Fewer than thirty people have ever been charged with treason under these laws.[3]

Constitutionally, citizens of the United States owe allegiance to at least two sovereigns. One is the United States, and the other is their state. They can therefore potentially commit treason against either, or against both.[4] At least fourteen people have been charged with treason against various states; at least six were convicted, five of whom were executed. Only one person has ever been executed for treason against the federal government: William Bruce Mumford, who was convicted of treason and hanged in 1862 for tearing down a United States flag during the American Civil War. However, this was under martial law, not Article Three of the United States Constitution.[5]
 
they are much more Brits than Mongol bydlo (Muscovites), do you agree?

No. Much of the people protesting weren't even alive when Hong Kong was turned over to China.

And "Mongol bydlo (Muscovites)"?

What Mongol Muscovites?

There haven't been "Mongol Muscovites" in many hundreds of years.
 
what are you talking about ? the hans China is product of 20c. so there no such thing like "back to China "? but you have a point here, UK had no right to ceded British free people to the red hans slavary

1. Han China has existed for millennia. Han is a people. Not a political system.

2. Hong Kong was indeed given back to China.

3. Great Britain had every right to return Hong Kong to China since the majority of the population was ethnic Chinese.
 
“Satanic”
Bolsheviks killed 300 000 priests in Russia during communism - Russian Priest Dmitriy Smirnov


During the Russian Civil War, the Red Army massacred large numbers of clergy and believers often on grounds of alleged support for the Whites; much of these killings were not officially instigated from the top, but were done on the initiative of local units of soldiers.[8] In later years, the church would declare that the excommunication was a misunderstanding based on the belief that these killings were officially instigated (however, they were never officially repudiated either).[9] However, later Soviet authors would claim central responsibility for these actions, including Yemelyan Yaroslavsky (who was a participant in these killings) who justified the campaign by claiming that the church was fighting against them.

Many monasteries were attacked. Holy Mountain Monastery near Kharkov was plundered very early in the civil war. In a nearby skete in the village of Gorokhova a monk named Izrail was murdered for refusing to hand over the keys to the skete cellars. In the same area, a religious procession was attacked on its way as it rested the night, and two priests, a deacon, the owner of the cottage where they were staying at as well as his daughter were all killed.[10]

Metropolitan Vladimir (Bogoyavlensky) of Kiev was the first bishop killed by the Bolsheviks on January 25, 1918. He had consistently opposed the revolution, and he was severely beaten as well as tortured before being shot outside the Monastery of the Caves. Before being shot by his murderers he prayed to God for them to be forgiven.[11]

In the Don region in February 1918 the Reds were killing every priest they could find.[10] An 80-year-old monk-priest named Amvrosi was beaten with rifle butts before being killed. A priest named Dimitri was brought to a cemetery and undressed, but when he tried to cross himself before being killed, a soldier chopped off his right arm. An old priest who tried to stop the execution of a peasant was beaten and cut to pieces with swords. In the Holy Saviour Monastery, Red soldiers arrested and killed the 75-year-old abbot by scalping him and beheading him. In the Kherson province a priest was crucified. In a Kuban Cossack village an eighty-year-old priest was forced to wear women's clothing, brought to the village square and ordered to dance; when he refused, he was hanged.[12]

In the Kuban Cossack village of Plotavy, Fr Yakov Vladimirov was targeted by the Chekists for his popularity. They executed him along with wife and one of his sons (he had two sons, but they killed a different child in place of that son by mistake).[13]

Bishop Hermogenes (Dolganyov) of Tobolsk, was killed along with other detainees on 16 June 1918 by drowning. He had organized a religious procession the day after the Tsar had come through Tobolsk on their way to Ekaterinburg (April 28), in which he blessed the Royal family. He was arrested the following week and the Soviets promised to release him for 10,000 roubles, and later 100,000 roubles. When the ransom was collected and submitted, the delegation of notables and clergy that had delivered it were arrested as well (and later executed). Germogen was reportedly taken on a river steamer, rocks were attached to his head and he was thrown into the water.[14]
 
In Voronezh, seven nuns who had prayed for a White victory were reportedly boiled in a cauldron of tar.[13]

Archbishop Joachim of Nizhni Novgorod was murdered by red forces who hanged him head down on the iconostasis above the central 'Royal Doors'. The clergy in the Crimea suffered terribly: one priest named Ugliansky was killed by Red forces on grounds that he used green ribbons instead of red ribbons on the church icon lamps. Churches in Simferopol, Feodosia and other parts of the Crimea were desecrated and their clergy were brutally murdered.[15]

Filosof Ornatsky, a priest in Petrograd, was arrested in the spring of 1918 after giving a public requiem for victims of the Bolsheviks. He and thirty-two others were driven to a cliff overlooking the Gulf of Finland, where the priest was allowed to perform a brief funeral service and bless the victims, before they were all shot and dropped into the sea. Archpriest John Vostorgov in Moscow, a famous Orthodox missionary and church activist, preached against the Bolsheviks and as a result he was black-mailed by the Bolsheviks, arrested and executed. He was executed along with Roman Catholic priest Lutoslawski and his brother, two tsarist ministers (N. Maklakov and Alexei Khvostov), an Orthodox bishop Efren, former State Council Chairman Ivan Shcheglovitov and Senator S. Beletsky. Fr Vostorgov conducted a short funeral service and preached to his victims to face death as a sacrifice of atonement, after which each victim came forward to be blessed by Fr Vostorgov and the Bishop; then they were shot.[16]
.....
 
Back
Top Bottom