No, it didn't. It clearly pointed to a handful of hand picked "witnesses" who presumed something for which they had no evidence. They were not, in fact, witnesses.
The only person to present first hand knowledge was Sondland, and Sondland's only first hand knowledge was a demand by Trump that there be no quid pro quo.
And, as I said, support for the impeachment declined on conclusion of the hearing. You may be invested in believing the impeachment was successful, but how on earth can you justify that when the lopsided Democrat carnival soured more voters than it swayed, and Trump exited the hearings leading in Wisconsin against the Democrat field?
And rational and sane people DO see it as proof of a deep state. In fact, even the liberal media can't avoid it anymore. The Democrats key witnesses, and the whistleblower, were all unelected government officials working with the Democrats and leaking information to undermine US foreign policy. What is that if not the deep state? :roll: