• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Whistleblower lawyer lashes out at Jordan: 'I AM TIRED OF YOU LYING IN A HOUSE COMMITTEE ROOM'

Vindman And Schiff both said they didn’t know who the WB was. So what does your disgusting post have to do with the thread.
Moot said:
What does Vindman have to do with the topic of the thread?
Click to expand...
 
Moot said:
The WB talked to half a dozen people in the WH. It was their collective information that inspired the WB to file the complaint. That Vindman was one of those six people validates the WB complaint.
Click to expand...

It validates nothing.

Everything Vindman has said is a product of his own opinion and we already knew that Ciaramella presented nothing but the opinions of others.

But what we now know for a fact is that Vindman lied when he said he doesn't know who the whistleblower is.

What else is he lying about?

Following his chain of command? We know that's a lie, too.

What else is he lying about?
 
Mycroft said:
It validates nothing.

Everything Vindman has said is a product of his own opinion and we already knew that Ciaramella presented nothing but the opinions of others.

But what we now know for a fact is that Vindman lied when he said he doesn't know who the whistleblower is.

What else is he lying about?

Following his chain of command? We know that's a lie, too.

What else is he lying about?
Click to expand...

Denial isn't just a river in Egypt....it's a right wing swamp in the US.
 
SLC said:
Vindman And Schiff both said they didn’t know who the WB was. So what does your disgusting post have to do with the thread.
Click to expand...

The disgusting, lying Gym Jordan is the topic of the thread...not Vindman or Schiff. From the OP...

"....I'd like to know a lot more about Jordan's involvement with sexual misconduct with student wrestlers while an assistant coach at OSU. That would be much more interesting.
Click to expand...

SLC said:
What a disgusting excuse for a post. I’m embarrassed for you. :3oops:
Click to expand...

Sweet. The right wing medicine is working. You tear the witnesses apart...we tear Gym Jordan apart. See how that works? Now run along...yo master's calling.
 
Moot said:
The disgusting, lying Gym Jordan is the topic of the thread...not Vindman or Schiff. From the OP...





Sweet. The right wing medicine is working. You tear the witnesses apart...we tear Gym Jordan apart. See how that works? Now run along...yo master's calling.
Click to expand...
No remorse for you disgusting childish post. Figures you can’t defend such disgusting behavior. Grow up.
 
Moot said:
Denial isn't just a river in Egypt....it's a right wing swamp in the US.
Click to expand...
You just aren’t doing very good in this thread. Perhaps you should just move along a lick your wounds.
 
SLC said:
No remorse for you disgusting childish post. Figures you can’t defend such disgusting behavior. Grow up.
Click to expand...

Too late...I'm an old lady. Bwahahahaha. Say, don't you have a child rapist to go defend? The Epstein case is still active, ya know?
 
SLC said:
He said under oath that he didn’t know who the WB was. I think that is not true. Schiff also said he did not know who the WB is. That is a lie also. This whole thing is such a joke. :roll:
Click to expand...

You know what they know? Fascinating.
 
Trump said:
looks like someone was triggered...:shrug:
Click to expand...

Bakaj is correcting a congressperson who lies about Bakaj's client every time he mentions her or him and you call that "triggered"?
 
Moot said:
Too late...I'm an old lady. Bwahahahaha. Say, don't you have a child rapist to go defend? The Epstein case is still active, ya know?
Click to expand...
Old maybe but a lady would never make such a vulgar post. So I guess that just makes you old and vulgar.
 
Moot said:
The disgusting, lying Gym Jordan is the topic of the thread...not Vindman or Schiff. From the OP...





Sweet. The right wing medicine is working. You tear the witnesses apart...we tear Gym Jordan apart. See how that works? Now run along...yo master's calling.
Click to expand...

No matter what anyone else says, I got a kick out of your post. Jordan has always seemed like a noisy power bottom to me.
 
Nalu said:
No matter what anyone else says, I got a kick out of your post. Jordan has always seemed like a noisy power bottom to me.
Click to expand...
So that makes two of you that like vulgar disgusting posts. Nice :roll:
 
SLC said:
You obviously did not watch Vindman’s testimony today
. :lol:
Click to expand...

Nope. I hope to watch it or at least some of it tonight. I haven't seen any "Vindman and Schiff Lie During Hearing" headlines, though, so I'm doubtful of your conclusion.
 
SLC said:
He said under oath that he didn’t know who the WB was. I think that is not true. Schiff also said he did not know who the WB is. That is a lie also. This whole thing is such a joke. :roll:
Click to expand...

Really, can you tell me which teams to bet on this Sunday as well?
 
SLC said:
I concluded it was Vindman a week or so ago. vindman seems to have a self exalted view of his importance. He also seems to have stepped out of the chain of comma and And was conducting his own foreign policy without OK from his superiors.
Click to expand...

Assumes facts not in evidence.
 
SLC said:
So that makes two of you that like vulgar disgusting posts. Nice :roll:
Click to expand...

I see. Saying Jordan got tapped by the wrestling coach is where you draw a line.
 
Nalu said:
Nope. I hope to watch it or at least some of it tonight. I haven't seen any "Vindman and Schiff Lie During Hearing" headlines, though, so I'm doubtful of your conclusion.
Click to expand...
Watch the part where Vindman is asked who he spoke with about the call and watch his reactions and Schiff’s reaction. Remember that both of them have said they do not know who the WB is.
 
mrjurrs said:
Ohio is a mandated report state. Is wresting coach excluded?
Click to expand...

Were those laws put into effect before or after Jim Jordan's coaching?
 
Wow, more people are realizing that Jordan is a lying scumbag. What took him so long?
 
I hate to tell the lawyer but Trump and his guys are not going to stop lying about what happened.
 
mrjurrs said:
Ohio is a mandated report state. Is wresting coach excluded?
Click to expand...

Newp. It counts there as well.

Don't know the date, but regardless of that, ANY moral adult human would have been all over this from the second he/she heard it.

Gym Jordan is human ass-effluvia. Heavy with nuggets.
 
Napoleon said:
There’s no real evidence that Schiff knows who it is but he can deduce that Vindman probably does because of two things. First, the whistleblower says in the complaint, “Multiple White House officials with direct knowledge of the call informed me...” One of those officials is probably Vindman given what we know about who was on that call. Second, Vindman declined to name the second person he provided the call readout to.
Click to expand...

He knows who it is because it was schiff that talked to him before he filed the complaint.
 
trixare4kids said:
Oh does he ever... His own words prove it.
Let's face it, he, like the other haters in the federal government didn't like Trump snooping into Ukraine corruption.
Now why do you suppose that was?
Click to expand...

This was an easy one. All of the people that have testified were already in on the whole obama/biden thing.
they knew what was going on and how hunter biden got on with that corrupt Ukrainian oil company.

they also knew how biden was over the ukrainian section of foreign policy.
so they know/knew everything that was going down there.

if there was an investigation open or got started they all would have been named as accomplices
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom