• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

US Army prepared to move Vindman to secure location: report

Geoist said:
I left the possibility open to 'perhaps a few.' Not going to try and paint all Antifa with a broad brush. I know a few anarchists who actually do vote. But yes, Antifa does view the Democratic Party as neoliberal traitors.
Click to expand...
And how many Antifa members voted for GOP candidates do you think?
 
Redress said:
If a law about emissions standards includes a definition of what an automobile is, it does not make automobiles illegal. You should read 18 U.S. Code § 1924 and see what it actually does.
Click to expand...

I posted definitions of classified material listed in 18USC1924. :lamo
 
Vern said:
"American", your pathological obedience to trump really makes me ill. Its because of people like you I know democracy wont last another generation in this country. Read this slowly, your conservative masters are attacking someone for telling the truth and he now has to be concerned for his and his family's safety because of people like you.
Click to expand...

Every frikkin' post. Get a new playbook, Vern.
 
tacomancer said:
The whistle blower cited that knowing this stuff is part of their official duties. Your assertion is that Vindland possibly broke the law by telling the WB. The WB's claims were checked and vetted and if the law was broken, it would have not gotten this far and the WB would have been in trouble for knowing classified information inappropriately or their sources would be in trouble for the same (or both)

That proves you wrong.
Click to expand...

If that were true, he wouldn't have had to report second hand information.
 
apdst said:
You didn't know that the fabled WB reported second hand information in his complaint to the IG?
Click to expand...

That part I am not disputing. The part that makes no sense is that second hand info is incompatible with someone doing their job.
 
OpportunityCost said:
Every frikkin' post. Get a new playbook, Vern.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't say every post. Hey, what about the posts where I asked you to back up your "claims"?

Vern said:
OC, I’ve ignored nothing and you’ve posted no charts. Someday I’d like you to explain how I’m ignoring something that I’ve posted repeatedly. For now I’d like you focus on the charts you have not posted. Can you please post the charts you claim to have posted several times.
Click to expand...
 
apdst said:
I posted definitions of classified material listed in 18USC1924. :lamo
Click to expand...

I never denied the definition of classified material. I am saying the law does not do anything about talking about classified material, which was the whole purpose of you referencing the law. Also not that the definition in 18 U.S. Code § 1924 is solely for 18 U.S. Code § 1924, and not other places of US code.
 
If?

It will be too late at that point.

Look, you don't cross "The Great White Hope" without backlash. It's that simple.
 
Does anyone else think its strange that Vindman was offered the position of Defense Minister in the Ukraine?
 
SLC said:
Does anyone else think its strange that Vindman was offered the position of Defense Minister in the Ukraine?
Click to expand...

Yeah. Did he accept?
 
SLC said:
Does anyone else think its strange that Vindman was offered the position of Defense Minister in the Ukraine?
Click to expand...

Only GOPutin traitors who question Vindman’s loyalty to the USA.
 
apdst said:
Did he report it to the FBI?
Click to expand...

News said he reported it to army intel/counterintel, as required of a US servicemember.

Now, did he accept the offer?
 
Hamish Howl said:
News said he reported it to army intel/counterintel, as required of a US servicemember.

Now, did he accept the offer?
Click to expand...

According to whom? Vindman? I think we need to see the report.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom