• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ambassador’s call to Trump from Kyiv restaurant was a stunning breach of security

Moot said:
Ummm....no. They heard Trump's voice loud and clear.
Click to expand...



LOLOLOLOL! how loudly or clearly something was heard is irrelevant as to whether it is hearsay. If you loudly and clearly state that the sky is blue, and I testify in court that you stated the sky was blue, its hearsay
 
Conservative said:
You have been trying to get rid of Trump since he won the election in 2016. You couldn't care less about Ukraine and will do everything possible to divert from the actual verifiable Trump record. Trump up charges, opinions, and hate rhetoric will never win a court case or any debate. You just continue to show how issues bankrupt the Democratic Party is today. There is no viable reason to vote for a Democrat in 2020. All your party stands for is politics of personal destruction, class envy, jealousy, divisiveness and creating more dependent people on a massive central gov't
Click to expand...

I haven't been trying to do any such thing. I have been interested in Ukraine ever since they had their Maiden Revolution. Trump followers like you are the ones showing how bankrupt the GOP is and make Trump the most viable reason to vote for a Democrat. All your party stands for is greed, deceit, corruption, fear, hate, ignorance, racism, bigotry, hypocrisy, lawlessness, treason and massive destruction of the entire planet.
 
dixon01767 said:
LOLOLOLOL! how loudly or clearly something was heard is irrelevant as to whether it is hearsay. If you loudly and clearly state that the sky is blue, and I testify in court that you stated the sky was blue, its hearsay
Click to expand...

Lol...thats not hearsay. Hearsay is second or third hand information. So if you heard me say the sky is blue then that is first hand information. But if you say that you heard that I said the sky is blue from someone else...then that is hearsay.
 
Moot said:
I haven't been trying to do any such thing. I have been interested in Ukraine ever since they had their Maiden Revolution. Trump followers like you are the ones showing how bankrupt the GOP is and make Trump the most viable reason to vote for a Democrat. All your party stands for is greed, deceit, corruption, fear, hate, ignorance, racism, bigotry, hypocrisy, lawlessness, treason and massive destruction of the entire planet.
Click to expand...

You turn a blind eye to any illegal activities of the DNC to focus on a non issue with Ukraine and that speaks volumes about you. Again no reason to vote FOR a Democrat as you are choosing to vote AGAINST Trump without considering the alternative. "My Party"? I am a Conservative not a radical like you, I stand for pro growth, personal responsibility, America first, states rights, smaller central gov't and less forced dependence that your party promotes. Those adjectives you posted represent today's Democratic Party and show how easily it is to indoctrinate people. There is nothing in today's Democratic Party but the adjectives you list
 
Last edited:
Conservative said:
You turn a blind eye to any illegal activities of the DNC to focus on a non issue with Ukraine and that speaks volumes about you. Again no reason to vote FOR a Democrat as you are choosing to vote AGAINST Trump without considering the alternative. "My Party"? I am a Conservative not a radical like you, I stand for pro growth, personal responsibility, America first, states rights, smaller central gov't and less forced dependence that your party promotes. Those adjectives you posted represent today's Democratic Party and show how easily it is to indoctrinate people. There is nothing in today's Democratic Party but the adjectives you list
Click to expand...

Pssst...your TDS is showing.
 
Moot said:
Pssst...your TDS is showing.
Click to expand...

No, your ignorance is showing, please explain where those adjectives are on display with Trump supporters and a part of the past three years? Looks to me like you have no understanding of personal responsibility calling it greedy to take care of one's family and allowing the states to take care of social issues? There is no one more corrupt than the Clinton and Chicago politician Obama but you are blinded by your own ideology

I am willing to listen to fact based claims against Trump to support those adjectives but not anything that happened prior to him being elected. We knew the warts when he ran for office and it was Hillary that led me to vote for Trump and I am getting the results I voted for
 
Moot said:
Lol...thats not hearsay. Hearsay is second or third hand information. So if you heard me say the sky is blue then that is first hand information. But if you say that you heard that I said the sky is blue from someone else...then that is hearsay.
Click to expand...


Obviously you have no clue what hearsay even means. In my above scenario I couldn't testify as to your statement in a court of law to establish that the sky was blue on that particular day. Its hearsay.
 
dixon01767 said:
Obviously you have no clue what hearsay even means. In my above scenario I couldn't testify as to your statement in a court of law to establish that the sky was blue on that particular day. Its hearsay.
Click to expand...

It doesn't take a scenario to know what hearsay is....you can just look it up in the dictionary. And while you're at it....look up the word 'clueless' because you fit the definition to the letter.
 
Moot said:
It doesn't take a scenario to know what hearsay is....you can just look it up in the dictionary. And while you're at it....look up the word 'clueless' because you fit the definition to the letter.
Click to expand...

Definition of hearsay evidence
: evidence based not on a witness's personal knowledge but on another's statement not made under oath

SUCH AS my testimony that you stated the sky was blue.
 
dixon01767 said:
Definition of hearsay evidence
: evidence based not on a witness's personal knowledge but on another's statement not made under oath

SUCH AS my testimony that you stated the sky was blue.
Click to expand...

"...The term “hearsay” refers to an out-of-court statement made by someone other than the witness reporting it. For example, while testifying in John's murder trial, Anthony states that John's best friend told him that John had killed the victim...."​

Now suppose it was John that told Anthony that he killed the victim....would that be hearsay? .
 
Moot said:
"...The term “hearsay” refers to an out-of-court statement made by someone other than the witness reporting it. For example, while testifying in John's murder trial, Anthony states that John's best friend told him that John had killed the victim...."​

Now suppose it was John that told Anthony that he killed the victim....would that be hearsay? .
Click to expand...


Why yes it would be hearsay because its "an out-of-court statement made by someone other than the witness reporting it".
 
dixon01767 said:
Why yes it would be hearsay because its "an out-of-court statement made by someone other than the witness reporting it".
Click to expand...

I think that only applies in federal court trials...but not in "civil courts, grand jury deliberations, probation hearings, parole revocation hearings, and proceedings before administrative bodies'...such as an impeachment hearing....

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom