• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump lures GOP senators on impeachment with cold cash

Obscurity said:
Yep! York is south, near where my wife was born. It's a great area. Those are the flatlands, I live in the frozen north mountains! lolol
Click to expand...

LOL oh yea, I've been up there when I was coaching hockey and officiating hockey, it was always an interesting drive...
 
Cardinal said:
Let's just say, solely for the sake of argument, that there are examples of past Presidents attempting to bribe Senators to protect them in the event of an impeachment. There aren't, but let's say there are. Would that make it right?
Click to expand...

So you still got nuthin'.
 
Cardinal said:
I’m quoting a lawyer and am not myself qualified to say if what he’s doing is illegal, but if he is overtly withholding election funds from Republicans in return for support in his impeachment hearing, that could certainly be argued to be additional abuse of power.
Click to expand...

Just another quid pro quo.
 
Mycroft said:
View attachment 67267366
Click to expand...

Your point was not so shrouded in mystery as you may think. What was interesting was your inability to spot the irony in your post, and your ability to ignore the obvious, when it was so clearly pointed out to you.

But hey, thanks for playing. What is that chant I hear you saying? Oh yes, we are number two, but we try harder :)
 
If I was Trump I'd hold a campaign rally in each of the Democrat at risk congressional districts and tout the Republican challenger. He needs to help retake the house. I'd also think he should help finance the Republican challengers in those districts.
 
Mycroft said:
shrug...

At least he's not using taxpayer money for political purposes like the House Dems are doing.
Click to expand...

All that shrugging will give you shoulder problems
 
Cardinal said:
Ah, this explains why the White House has been notably absent in crafting any kind of defense for a phone call in which Trump withheld $400 million in military aid so that a foreign country could open an investigation into his political opponent: he is buying the jurors.



Trump lures GOP senators on impeachment with cold cash - POLITICO
Click to expand...
What's new? An entitled, criminal douche-bag using someone else's money so he can get attention and not do any work.

This piece of **** has been doing just that for his entire life.

:doh
 
j brown's body said:
Just another quid pro quo.
Click to expand...

ITA. Paying off a juror for a vote of innocence would be charged as felony bribery. A juror accepting would be charged with taking a bribe.
 
the GOP actually loves sleazy politicians.
 
tres borrachos said:
So in addition to no longer being the Party of Family Values, and no longer being the Party of Military Supporters, I guess the Republicans are now no longer the Party of Personal Responsibility, either.

It isn't Trump's fault he abused the power of his office. It's everyone else's!
Click to expand...

Trump’s ‘dirty laundry’ cold ca$h is his Ace in the Hole, the great equalizer. We can continue to thank Citizens United 2.0 for that, and McConnell for arguing that case in front of the USSC.

These GOP Senatorial bribes are just part of this latest new beginning, as we saw with Trump ads during last night’s World Series. These ads will come early and often before and during the holidays, as we saw in late 2013.

The NYT-Sienna College poll today on — MI, WI, PA — AZ, FL, NC — is quite informative and instructional. It measured actually impeaching Trump versus just opening the inquiry.

I still think we’re a 40-40-20 Nation. There’s several other swing and notable states, even CDs, that we’ll be seeing polls on.
 
Cardinal said:
Ah, this explains why the White House has been notably absent in crafting any kind of defense for a phone call in which Trump withheld $400 million in military aid so that a foreign country could open an investigation into his political opponent: he is buying the jurors.



Trump lures GOP senators on impeachment with cold cash - POLITICO
Click to expand...

Except he DIDN'T withhold the money during the call, it was never mentioned. Do you ever post anything factual?
 
Bullseye said:
Except he DIDN'T withhold the money during the call, it was never mentioned. Do you ever post anything factual?
Click to expand...

Thus far, everyone who has gone before the Intel Committee has confirmed the quid pro quo, Hell, even 45 and Mulvaney confirmed the quid and the quo.. And yes, the money was withheld to the point of Congress asking why it was not paid. It was finally released mid-September.
 
Parrish said:
Thus far, everyone who has gone before the Intel Committee has confirmed the quid pro quo, Hell, even 45 and Mulvaney confirmed the quid and the quo.. And yes, the money was withheld to the point of Congress asking why it was not paid. It was finally released mid-September.
Click to expand...

Seems like a good game. If you can't prove quid pro quo with the evidence available. Dig up as many people to simply say that there was and let weight of opinion do the damage, truth be damned in any case.
 
Oborosen said:
Seems like a good game. If you can't prove quid pro quo with the evidence available. Dig up as many people to simply say that there was and let weight of opinion do the damage, truth be damned in any case.
Click to expand...

:shock:pOTUS and Mulvaney admitted it was a quid pro quo. The witnesses, all of them so far, confirmed what 45 and his CoS said happened.
 
Bullseye said:
Except he DIDN'T withhold the money during the call, it was never mentioned. Do you ever post anything factual?
Click to expand...

You’re mixing up the three calls.
 
SLC said:
No they do because if they did they would be Democrats. :lamo
Click to expand...

You guys, many of you christians, are supporting a politician who may be the most corrupt politician in the history of our country. A person who constantly cheats on his wives and mistresses, cheats other businesses out of money, can't get a US loan and lies constantly. The current extortion thing is just icing on the cake.

I actually love that you guys are supporting him because I have been telling people for 30 years how corrupt and fake 0Republican voters really are. All you guys have done is prove me right.

Bravo.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom