• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump to host G7 at his own Florida resort property

so you think amount matters in emolument violation?

I'm consistent you're not.

agree to disagree...have a great day

You do know that that emoluments clause has do with 'gifts' or 'emoluments' from foreign states, don't you? So then are you trying to say all those millions in book sales were from foreign states trying to curry favor with then President Obama?
 
You do know that that emoluments clause has do with 'gifts' or 'emoluments' from foreign states, don't you? So then are you trying to say all those millions in book sales were from foreign states trying to curry favor with then President Obama?

how about if it was just one? would that matter?
 
Did you have a problem with Obama selling millions of books while he was President? I didn't

Do I care if government business gets conducted at a Trump property ....if they are charging above and beyond normal rates....yes that's a problem ....but that's a problem with any location.

They vetted it and there is no problem with rules and laws.

I know this will never be acceptable to Dems...oh well....as George Soros says...Move On:lol:

Oh sure, it was "vetted." Then they refuse to turn over the documents showing how this was the best location in the country.

Just think about it and tell us this passes the smell test. In the entire country, this is the best place.

What's going on is that Trump sees that impeachment is coming and he is convinced that the Republicans will protect him. So, why not grab as much as long as you can? When you're a star, they let you do it.

Oh, what books did Obama write as president?
 
how about if it was just one? would that matter?

Do you think it would matter? How much favor do you think the purchase of a single book would garner you? Come on, be realistic now.
 
The next democratic president definitely needs to buy some hotels in advance and host a bunch of political stuff at their hotels to make major $$$$ off of being a politician.

In hindsight why did Obama not have "Obama Hotels" to make major money off of?
 
Trump to host G7 at his own Florida resort property

I guess the guy figured the time to enrich himself from both foreign and domestic taxpayer might be closing down soon, with impeachment and all... So, should hurry up and do it!



Right on!



I bet all the properties that they really considered had Trump name on them.



:lamo Alternative facts, folks... just move along...

I guess the last act of Trump before leaving will be to sell White House itself and its land to Trump Org; so all future Presidents rent from him and his offspring.

Trump wanted this and his ass kissers are not about to challenge that. They don’t want to be screamed at and belittled.
 
starts at 21:30 talking about Doral

 
Do you think it would matter? How much favor do you think the purchase of a single book would garner you? Come on, be realistic now.

so amount matters....silly corner you've painted yourself into....

Agree to disagree...I'm good with Obama and Trump...you're not
 
so amount matters....silly corner you've painted yourself into....

Agree to disagree...I'm good with Obama and Trump...you're not

The whole argument is silly. When I buy a book from Obama, Obama doesn't sell me the book. It's sold by retailers. That's not an emolument., by any stretch. Trump renting rooms to foreign countries, he knows who's renting. Moreover, it's profiteering when he gets to decide where the G7 will be held and then it just happens to be at the place where he'll make money.
 
starts at 21:30 talking about Doral



Mulvaney claims there, as President has claimed that the President has lost money since becoming President. I say well then Mr Mulvaney release the President's tax returns and let's see if that is indeed the case. Seems simple enough, right? Meanwhile not to long ago this this story came out.
Leaked documents reveal Trump's prized Doral resort is in steep decline | The Independent

Late last year, in a Miami conference room, a consultant for President Donald Trump's company said business at his prized 643-room Doral resort in Florida was in sharp decline.

At Doral, which Mr Trump has listed in federal disclosures as his biggest moneymaker hotel, room rates, banquets, golf and overall revenue were all down since 2015. In two years, the resort's net operating income - a key figure, representing the amount left over after expenses are paid - had fallen by 69 per cent.

Even in a vigorous economy, the property was missing the Trump Organization's internal business targets; for instance, the club expected to take in $85 million in revenue in 2017 but took in just $75 million.

"They are severely underperforming" other resorts in the area, tax consultant Jessica Vachiratevanurak told a Miami-Dade County official in a bid to lower the property's tax bill. The reason, she said: "There is some negative connotation that is associated with the brand."
Mr Trump has entwined his office with his private company, drawing scrutiny from congressional Democrats interested in whether his company is benefiting from that relationship. At the same time, revenue has declined at some properties dependent on blue-state customers and politics-shy national brands.

The troubles at Trump Doral - detailed here for the first time, based on documents and video obtained under Florida's public-records law - suggest the Trump Organisation's problems are bigger than previously known. This is also the first known case in which a Trump Organisation representative has publicly acknowledged the president's name has hurt business.

The decline at Doral is especially significant because the resort had seemed better insulated from political backlash than other Trump properties, protected by its place in golf's history, by its recent renovations, and by its location in a booming state that Trump won in 2016.

It wasn't.

"Profitability is down across the board," Michael Bellisario, an analyst with Robert W. Baird & Co, said after reviewing at the request of The Washington Post the data that Trump provided Miami-Dade County.

Things that make you go hmmmm.
 
The whole argument is silly. When I buy a book from Obama, Obama doesn't sell me the book. It's sold by retailers. That's not an emolument., by any stretch. Trump renting rooms to foreign countries, he knows who's renting. Moreover, it's profiteering when he gets to decide where the G7 will be held and then it just happens to be at the place where he'll make money.

elections have consequences...Obama got to decide where his meetings were

just nominate a great candidate and defeat Trump and they get to decide where to have their meetings:peace
 
Mulvaney claims there, as President has claimed that the President has lost money since becoming President. I say well then Mr Mulvaney release the President's tax returns and let's see if that is indeed the case. Seems simple enough, right? Meanwhile not to long ago this this story came out.
Leaked documents reveal Trump's prized Doral resort is in steep decline | The Independent



Things that make you go hmmmm.

new daily bone...go get him ...attack attack attack...predicable :peace
 
so amount matters....silly corner you've painted yourself into....

Agree to disagree...I'm good with Obama and Trump...you're not

I asked you if it mattered and you refuse to answer as usual. Because if you did the hypocrisy becomes clear. Come on you can do better than I know you are but what am I.
 
Last edited:
No democratic politician ever again needs to release their tax returns or divest from any business interests.

They also need to hire all their kids into their cabinets.
 
elections have consequences...Obama got to decide where his meetings were

just nominate a great candidate and defeat Trump and they get to decide where to have their meetings:peace

Presidents don't get to make decisions that violate the law, not even for presidents that won a majority of voters, unlike #45.
 
Presidents don't get to make decisions that violate the law, not even for presidents that won a majority of voters, unlike #45.

if you had something Pelosi would have already Impeached over emolument clause...its old news.

saying it violates the law doesn't make it true...see above statement
 
if you had something Pelosi would have already Impeached over emolument clause...its old news.

saying it violates the law doesn't make it true...see above statement
News for you: I don't have anything to do with the information gathering of the committees.

If you think this is taking too much time, the Watergate investigation started February 7, 1973. On July 27, 1974, the House Judiciary Committee voted 27-to-11 to recommend the first article of impeachment against the president: obstruction of justice. The Committee recommended the second article, abuse of power, on July 29, 1974. The next day, on July 30, 1974, the Committee recommended the third article: contempt of Congress. That's 17 months.
 
News for you: I don't have anything to do with the information gathering of the committees.

If you think this is taking too much time, the Watergate investigation started February 7, 1973. On July 27, 1974, the House Judiciary Committee voted 27-to-11 to recommend the first article of impeachment against the president: obstruction of justice. The Committee recommended the second article, abuse of power, on July 29, 1974. The next day, on July 30, 1974, the Committee recommended the third article: contempt of Congress. That's 17 months.

take your time....Dems gonna get rolled when IG and Durham reports drop.....don't think Nancy wants to be in a trial over impeachment when that happens.....big hot mess coming down the pipe...soon
 
Damn, they really are desperate.

They used to try to deflect from wrong doing by getting the media focused on silliness like Melania's jacket or Trump's golf trips.

But Ukraine is so serious and the hearings are going so badly for them that now they're throwing everything into the fire -- set Turkey loose on our Kurdish allies last week, the most in-your-face violation of the emoluments clause yet this week. What will happen next week?

Its like the world's ****tiest soap opera
 
Trump to host G7 at his own Florida resort property

I guess the guy figured the time to enrich himself from both foreign and domestic taxpayer might be closing down soon, with impeachment and all... So, should hurry up and do it!



Right on!



I bet all the properties that they really considered had Trump name on them.



:lamo Alternative facts, folks... just move along...

I guess the last act of Trump before leaving will be to sell White House itself and its land to Trump Org; so all future Presidents rent from him and his offspring.

It is unfathomable that 40% of our country are so ****ing stupid.
 
take your time....Dems gonna get rolled when IG and Durham reports drop.....don't think Nancy wants to be in a trial over impeachment when that happens.....big hot mess coming down the pipe...soon
You are holding out for something that is nothing but a conspiracy theory that Trump's own administration debunked. But whatever, have faith in nonsense.

Spygate (conspiracy theory) - Wikipedia

Ukraine, Australia, Italy, and UK feature in Trump-backed conspiracies - Vox
President Donald Trump is embroiled in a major scandal that stretches from Ukraine to Australia — all stemming from his belief in long-debunked right-wing conspiracy theories.
...
The problem is there is no “missing” physical server; there’s no actual reason to suspect Ukraine would have such a server in the first place; and there’s no evidence Ukraine interfered in the 2016 vote at all.

This idea stems from a conspiracy theory that has circulated in right-wing media for several years and has been thoroughly debunked. Yet Trump believes it all the same — enough that he felt the need to rope a foreign leader into investigating it.
 
Last edited:
You are holding out for something that is nothing but a conspiracy theory that Trump's own administration debunked. But whatever, have faith in nonsense.

Spygate (conspiracy theory) - Wikipedia

yeah conspiracy theory based on a wiki site that does not know what Durham has found as he's hired more attorney's and expanded his time horizon and scope.

gotta do better than outdated sources
 
It is unfathomable that 40% of our country are so ****ing stupid.
It should be apparent by now that Trump is the national security threat that Dems said he was. He's violated his office by abusing the power of the presidency.
 
yeah conspiracy theory based on a wiki site that does not know what Durham has found as he's hired more attorney's and expanded his time horizon and scope.

gotta do better than outdated sources
There is no point debating someone who isn't influenced by facts. The right-wing conspiracy theories that Trump is basing his Ukrainian policies one have been debunked. The other citations that I listed can enlighten you.
 
There is no point debating someone who isn't influenced by facts. The right-wing conspiracy theories that Trump is basing his Ukrainian policies one have been debunked. The other citations that I listed can enlighten you.

and you won't acknowledge Durham has expanded his investigation which wiki site has no idea what they've found.

I'm willing to say whatever Durham reports I can accept....can you say same?
 
Back
Top Bottom