- Joined
- Sep 29, 2007
- Messages
- 123,767
- Reaction score
- 28,027
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
I wouldn't know.
Oh, I was thinking that would be a good selling point... you had the salesman pitch down.
I wouldn't know.
over-weight, middle-aged white guys that couldn't punch their way out of a wet paperbag or angry old ladies.
Which one are you?
Not an opinion, but a statement of fact.
They are following current House rules and you know it. Evidence is by its very nature non-partisan. Trump's job is to just submit it. Why do you think that is so hard for him to submit the evidence to prove his innocence? Obama submitted over 10,000 pages of requested documents on Benghazi and Hillary was grilled for 11 hours by House Republicans. Pompeo is refusing to testify at all. Trump refused to testify to Mueller also. Why are they all so scared of telling the truth? You really need to ask yourself that question. I already know why it is.
Every other presidential impeachment process has begun with a vote. But this one has Democrats that don't want to go on the record, because they'll have to pay the political consequences. So we just try to drag it out into election season.
There has been no obstruction of justice
If attempting to get dirt on your political opponent during an election year was illegal, then why isn't Hillary or Obama in prison? Are you really that stupid? Everything you accuse Trump, Hillary and Obama have already done ten times more. Where was your sense of civic responsibility then? That is the one thing all leftists have in common, they are defined by their hypocrisy.
Lol i guess your fine with Trump, the mastermind criminal, remaining in office. Apparently there iant sny urgency to impeach him.Poor Twump and Republicans...such snowflakes? Such victims!!! Will they ever get a break in their corruption and crime spree from people trying to stop them?!?
Now you want Trump's bad deeds not to have political consequences? Boo hoo!
Nancy won't hold a vote and she doesn't have too....boo hoo!
You guys need a safe space to cry this out. It's an investigation. When it goes to the Senate, they will have a trial, and you can point the finger at nonsense then, because that's the only defense Trump has, a bunch of crying nosnense. I wish that were hyperbole, but you know it's not.
It's a shameless political stunt.
If they actually believed there was something here worthy of impeachment, they'd follow precedent and this would look similar to Nixon's or Clinton's impeachment. It would be above board and not conducted from behind a partisan iron curtain. I mean, if what Trump supposedly did is that bad, why all the shenanigans?
False Dilemma...
"False Dilemma / Bifurcation Fallacy
Explanation
The bifurcation fallacy is committed when a false dilemma is presented, i.e. when someone is asked to choose between two options when there is at least one other option available. Of course, arguments that restrict the options to more than two but less than there really are are similarly fallacious."
Logical Fallacies >> False Dilemma / Bifurcation Fallacy
Try again...
Any fool that still supports this criminal, reality-TV idiot. You know, like the ones that attend those tard-rallies and believe the obvious BS from a well-know liar. You know, "build the wall."
Trump-cuck. 99 percent of them are over-weight, middle-aged white guys that couldn't punch their way out of a wet paperbag or angry old ladies.
Which one are you?
Just don't talk to me about your "conscience" and all is fine.
Lol i guess your fine with Trump, the mastermind criminal, remaining in office. Apparently there iant sny urgency to impeach him.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
You seem angry. Would a hug be out of the question?
No vote required. Several impeachment inquires did not have a vote
Of judges... who committed crimes. Never a president.
You came at me. I never talked to you. Your post was so warped with anger toward Trump that you didn't even realize that you and I are on the same side. I just don't hate him, which is apparently your standard for what is good enough to be liberal.
In that light, I have a few more things to say to you. Some Trump supporters hate us because of you, not me. With allies like you, who needs enemies? Secondly, don't tell me what to post again. I have no problem treating you like I treat the pro-Trump trolls in this forum if you can't muster enough self control to keep yourself from attacking someone who mostly agrees with you. Lastly, since you apparently need some help fine tuning your own conscience, let me know if I can recommend some resources to you.
The subpoenas have started.
I love this impeachment inquiry
What is an actual impeachment process if not calling witnesses to determine whether there is cause for impeachment?
I guess the witnesses are giving imaginary testimony to the committee "called" an impeachment inquiry.
Pelosi announces House won'''t vote now on whether to begin impeachment inquiry | Fox News
If there was any doubt as to what this "impeachment inquiry" really is, this announcement should erase that doubt. The House Democrats are interested in inflicting as much political damage as they can possibly get away with.
"We're here to find the truth". The truth is that statements like this are ****ing nauseating at this point, Nancy.
It's called congressional oversight, a normal function of Congress that happens all the time. The House actually has no authority regarding the process or litigation of an impeachment. That's the Senate's job. The only thing the House does is vote to have it move forward to the Senate for the trial.
Again...that's not a real thing so you can cling to it if you want. As for reality, it's just Congress doing normal oversite, as is their duty.
Pelosi announces House won'''t vote now on whether to begin impeachment inquiry | Fox News
If there was any doubt as to what this "impeachment inquiry" really is, this announcement should erase that doubt. The House Democrats are interested in inflicting as much political damage as they can possibly get away with.
"We're here to find the truth". The truth is that statements like this are ****ing nauseating at this point, Nancy.
Again...that's not a real thing so you can cling to it if you want. As for reality, it's just Congress doing normal oversite, as is their duty.
If you think so then stick with that.
Nope. They can do the investigation. The senate is just for the trial