• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Adam Schiff's staff includes 2 aides who worked with whistleblower at White House

What a S T R E T C H!

Working with people does not make you BFF's..... It's Washington.... everyone is connected with one or two degrees of separation.

I have worked with lots of people in my career; very, very few I would call friends. If my colleagues committed crimes, I would say something. In fact, even though I have a professional career, I have worked with two people that are now serving time for murder (domestic issues; one an Ernst & Young partner). They were not my friends then and they certainly are not my friends now. Because these people were NOT my friends, I had no idea about their personal lives. I just worked with them. They were ships that passed through my life.

We heard throughout the Mueller investigation that he was best buds with Comey. No, they were contemporary colleagues; not best buds.

This whole line of reasoning that if you know someone you would fall on a grenade for them, as Trump would have you believe, is a stretch of logic into the realm of illogical.

Oh they were more than simple contemporaries.
They both worked for Lockheed Martin in tandem and each benefited in those civilian positions from each other.
But that's for a different thread.
 
Whatever, my trump-worshipping friend. Sorry you're under such pressure lately.

Pressure? did you see that filled arena in Minneapolis last night? Trump had even more outside watching on big screens.

Trump in "enemy" territory looking strong....good chance Minnesota turns Red next year...you betcha...:lol:
 
Pressure? did you see that filled arena in Minneapolis last night? Trump had even more outside watching on big screens.

Trump in "enemy" territory looking strong....good chance Minnesota turns Red next year...you betcha...:lol:

35% of this nation's mentally ill supports/trusts him. I don't deny that. Unfortunately it won't be enough to "turn this nation red" my confused friend. Over 51% want him removed from office.
 
They don't know what they're arguing.

Ha Ha

All you do here is twist everyone's words, and pretend that you didn't know what they were saying...

That's called classic intellectual dishonesty.
 
doesn't even matter..Joe ain't gonna win the nomination...never was.

It's Lieawatha's to lose....she's working hard at that
Trump thought Biden was gonna be the nominee.
"I believe it will be Crazy Bernie Sanders vs. Sleepy Joe Biden as the two finalists to run against maybe the best Economy in the history of our Country (and MANY other great things)! I look forward to facing whoever it may be. May God Rest Their Soul!" - Donald Trump 4/16/19
"Welcome to the race Sleepy Joe. I only hope you have the intelligence, long in doubt, to wage a successful primary campaign. It will be nasty - you will be dealing with people who truly have some very sick & demented ideas. But if you make it, I will see you at the Starting Gate!" - Donald Trump 4/25/19
"Looks to me like it’s going to be SleepyCreepy Joe over Crazy Bernie. Everyone else is fading fast!" - Donald Trump 5/10/19
"Looks like Bernie Sanders is history. Sleepy Joe Biden is pulling ahead and think about it, I’m only here because of Sleepy Joe and the man who took him off the 1% trash heap, President O! China wants Sleepy Joe BADLY!" - Donald Trump 5/20/19
"@FoxNews is at it again. So different from what they used to be during the 2016 Primaries, & before - Proud Warriors! Now new Fox Polls, which have always been terrible to me (they had me losing BIG to Crooked Hillary), have me down to Sleepy Joe." - Donald Trump 7/26/19
"...the fact that I have gone through a three year vicious Witch Hunt, perpetrated by the Lamestream Media in Collusion with Crooked and the Democrat Party, there can be NO WAY, with the greatest Economy in U.S. history, that I can be losing to the Sleepy One. KEEP AMERICA GREAT!" Donald Trump 7/26/19
"My team is negotiating with them now, but they always change the deal in the end to their benefit. They should probably wait out our Election to see if we get one of the Democrat stiffs like Sleepy Joe. Then they could make a GREAT deal, like in past 30 years, and continue" - Donald Trump 7/30/19
That's why he did criminal things to try to damage him.
 
35% of this nation's mentally ill supports/trusts him. I don't deny that. Unfortunately it won't be enough to "turn this nation red" my confused friend. Over 51% want him removed from office.

This must mean that 65% of the nation's mentally ill, plus or minus a few million, don't support him/trust him.

:bravo:


Trump is a winner... Look at the China deal. He got it done.
He also isn't letting Turkey get away with jack but according to the mentally ill who hate him, they tell a different story.

laughs
 
OK how bout Hunter rakes in a cool $1,500,000,000.00 from China on a plane ride over with his Dad on Air Force 2...keep defending...love this game:lol:

I presume, from the way that you have worded it, that that would mean that Mr. Biden would have had to report that $1,500,000,000.00 as income and pay the (approximately) $555,000,000.00 in income tax owing on it.

Did he?

Did he even report it as income?

If he didn't, when is he going to go to jail for filing false income tax reports and defrauding the US government of (approximately) $555,000,000?

Is it just barely possible that you slightly and accidentally misstated yourself and you did not actually mean to say that Mr. Biden - personally - received the $1,500,000,000?

Or was the misstatement deliberate?

If so, did you base the misstatement on "reputable reports that you had absolutely no reason to believe were false"?

If so and if you did NOT base the misstatement on "reputable reports that you had absolutely no reason to believe were false"w, as the misstatement made when you actually knew it was false or was it simply made recklessly?
 
Does that change the facts the WB brought forward?

Actually the WB brought forward accusations.
The transcript brought forward the facts that refuted the WB.
 
This must mean that 65% of the nation's mentally ill, plus or minus a few million, don't support him/trust him.

:bravo:

Just because someone is mentally ill that does not mean that they are stupid as well.
 
Actually the WB brought forward accusations.
The transcript brought forward the facts that refuted the WB.

Wow Straight up lie there....
 
Has anyone actually tried to show what the issue here is?

There is none. It does not matter who the WB worked with. Just more distractions from the right when they can't address the main facets of the impeachment inquiry.
 
I've seen it a bunch of times here.

"So should they investigate "dem x" too then?"

Dems- "sure. If they broke the law bring em up on charges".

So should they investigate "Republican x?"

Repubs- "NOOOO! Look at Hillary!

I invite you to conduct some searches of the forum.

Its pretty common.

You said this...

Its only the right that defends its politicians regardless of what they do.

It's an absolute and demonstrably false.

Just stop.
 
This must mean that 65% of the nation's mentally ill, plus or minus a few million, don't support him/trust him.

:bravo:


Trump is a winner... Look at the China deal. He got it done.
He also isn't letting Turkey get away with jack but according to the mentally ill who hate him, they tell a different story.

laughs

Provide a link from a credible source for either of your claims. Please :roll:
 
I bet you wouldn't say "bfd" if the shoe were on the other foot. :lol:

You mean like when a couple of naturalized US citizens from Belarus and The Ukrane are called "associates" of Rudy Guiliani? No, that's a big deal.

Would it matter if instead of calling them Schiff's "staff" they were called his "associates"?
 
You might be right, my friend. trump could pardon Flynn and Rudy before he's forced to resign. trump has no trouble pardoning the scum of the earth.. just ask "sheriff" Arpaio!

Regarding Comey ore McCabe going to jail, lets see how successful trump and his crime syndicate is in coercing foreign countries into digging up false dirt on them. You could be right!
Lurch, they don't need false dirt on Comey or McCabe they have plenty of real dirt. Digging up false dirt is a Democrat trick just ask Nancy and Sack of Schiff and the Gossipblowers. :lol:
 
Lurch, they don't need false dirt on Comey or McCabe they have plenty of real dirt. Digging up false dirt is a Democrat trick just ask Nancy and Sack of Schiff and the Gossipblowers. :lol:

Yes, yes, yes :) trump is a strait arrow that speaks nothing but the truth and all those waskaly Democrats are the liars and criminals.. unfortunately, according to the Fox News poll taken last week you're in the minority of voters that feel that way :( Not only do a majority of voters favor impeachment and feel trump has failed the nation, but they favor removing trump from office :(
 
Has anyone actually tried to show what the issue here is?

There is none. It does not matter who the WB worked with. Just more distractions from the right when they can't address the main facets of the impeachment inquiry.

Well, anybody who worked at the white house since the Obama administration, and during the current administration 'worked with the wb'. That includes Mike Pence by the way. Is Mike Pence trying to get Trump impeached to become president? It's at least a convincing conspiracy theory as the right wing ones (which is to say not at all)
 
Wow Straight up lie there....

Nope. Fact.
Here's where I ask you to produce the text from the WB complaint and the matching text from the transcript.
 
The response to your thread is rather remarkable, isn't it?

It's like the dinner bell has rung at the pig farm and all the little critters have come running.

The cognitive dissonance and intellectual vacancy on the part of the crew would likely be alarming to anyone who stubbles across their posts, and doesn't know any better.

I thought the exact same thing after reading the spate of initial "so what" comments.

Nothing unusual about a cadre of leftist government employees hired (one in August) by a crooked leftist Congressman this year to investigate Trump who happen to have worked with a so-called WB who had his August complaint reviewed by the staff of the crooked leftist Congressman who neglected to tell his Committee (at least the minority) of the incestuous connection.
Happens every day.

I almost posted this yesterday

th


but I wanted to get back to the ballgame.
 
Has anyone actually tried to show what the issue here is?

There is none. It does not matter who the WB worked with. Just more distractions from the right when they can't address the main facets of the impeachment inquiry.

The "issue" here is very simple, it is

"It's just peachy keen for US to do 'X' because THEY did 'X' first

BUT

THEY should be sent to jail
because doing 'X' is
**I*L*L*E*G*A*L**
.
"
 
Back
Top Bottom