• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Fairfax County suspends officer who cooperated with ICE

danielpalos said:
Why did the officer get in trouble, if what you claim, is what happened?
Click to expand...

The law and department policy seem to be different.

Again, what would you have the officer do when he comes across somebody with a legally issued warrant from a judge?
 
bomberfox said:
ICE and the federal government maintains sole responsibility over this issue. It is not a state issue.
Click to expand...

Ok, so if a local officer comes across one of the FBI's 10 most wanted, they should let them go because it is a federal beef and they have sole responsibility over the issue?
 
pinqy said:
Clearly you do not know how warrants work, especially for civil offenses.
Click to expand...

The officer arrests people with warrants. It is not up to him to judge what the underlying charge was.
 
maxparrish said:
Nope. This translation represents his (and my own) view: demo candidate actions (and inaction) has spoken louder than their words.

You're welcome.
Click to expand...

demo candidate actions you are unable to cite

because there are no democratic candidates who advocate for open borders. that's just bull**** you have fabricated
 
TheParser said:
You are entitled to interpret my words any way that you wish.


Have a nice weekend!
Click to expand...

and i wish to point out that the statement that democratic candidates support open borders is a bogus statement

thank you for the invitation to set the story 'right'
 
ClaraD said:
The very first time I voted for a Democrat, ever was Obama. I turned 18 and voted for the first Bush. I'm a moderate that has been pushed to vote Democratic because I refuse to vote with hooligans and I made the mistake of twice voting for Lindsey Graham...won't make that mistake again and before you discuss my location...I'm in Charleston, SC...my property is in Hartsel...here for a few years, because my son is 100% service connected disabled
Click to expand...

Whoopie do. You realize you have already destroyed your credibility, so nothing you post can be viewed as true.
 
ocean515 said:
Whoopie do. You realize you have already destroyed your credibility, so nothing you post can be viewed as true.
Click to expand...
The only one destroying their credibility is YOU. Nothing I have said on here has ever went against my credibility. So, your pushing a lie simply because you don't like the fact I'm calling out your idiotic, corrupt thieving traitorous president has nothing to do with me...its a reflection on YOUR character
 
Stealers Wheel said:
No, a whistleblower steps up and points out suspected wrongdoing. This officer refused to obey the policy. That simply makes him insubordinate. If he wanted to be a whistleblower, he should have resigned and held a press conference explaining his reasons. He wanted to keep his job and decide which orders he would follow.
Click to expand...

He is a conscientious objector, a man of conscience. He knows right from wrong. Some don't, like those found in lynch mobs.
 
Roadvirus said:
blah blah blah boo ****ing hoo

And if this cop had let this guy go and he went on to commit a serious crime, the county and their ****ed-up policy would be at fault! Then we'd find out he had this "administrative" warrant and he wasn't turned over to ICE, and people will wonder "WTF did you not call them? He isn't suppose to be here!". The local politicos would then be doing verbal somersaults to save their puny overpaid asses.
Click to expand...
They would hang that cop out to dry to save thier hides. Now that we know they put cops on administrative leave for that, they lost that cover for themselves.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
danielpalos said:
give it to a supervisor who gets paid more?
Click to expand...

Then what would be the purpose of the office on the street?

They are trained to handle these situations.

Why would a supervisor need to be called for such a routine arrest?
 
danielpalos said:
What lawbreakers are you referring to? The right wing doesn't really care about the law, Constitutional or otherwise; they merely like to "practice the abomination of hypocrisy and blame the less fortunate."
Click to expand...
He's referring to Illegal Immigrants, but you already knew that. You just wanted to go off on a anti-law, anti-constitution rant. It is the left that "practice(s) the abomination of hypocrisy and blame(s) the less fortunate." Embrace it.
 
danielpalos said:
Where is there any authority over the whole and entire Concept of Immigration expressed in our federal Constitution and supreme law of the land?
Click to expand...

Irrelevant, and you know it.
 
COTO said:
Hypothetically speaking, if the federal government were to come a-grabbin'... View attachment 67265357
Click to expand...

IF that happened they would be in violation of our Second Amendment rights, and here in the US we have the right to defend them. China is in the bind they are in now, because they don't have that right.

IOW, your strawman has the same chance as a snowball in hell.
 
smallvoice said:
He's referring to Illegal Immigrants, but you already knew that. You just wanted to go off on a anti-law, anti-constitution rant. It is the left that "practice(s) the abomination of hypocrisy and blame(s) the less fortunate." Embrace it.
Click to expand...

you have nothing but bigotry, not any gospel Truth.

There is no express power over Immigration in our federal Constitution, if we have to quibble in supreme venues.
 
On April 3, 19-year-old Jose Orlando Vasquez-Guillen, of El Salvador, was allegedly driving drunk in St. Paul with a blood alcohol level of about 0.149 — nearly double the legal limit, according to law enforcement officials.
Vasquez-Guillen, according to police, was speeding when he hit Mark O’Gara, who was pulling out of a driveway with a woman in his car. When paramedics arrived, O’Gara was treated on the scene but soon died. The woman in the car with him had left to seek treatment for non-life threatening injuries at a hospital.



Records obtained by Breitbart News reveal that the Obama administration released Vasquez-Guillen in March 2016 after being taken into custody for illegally crossing the United States-Mexico border two months before. The policy, known as catch and release, has continued unchanged.

Like millions of other border crossers and illegal aliens, Vasquez-Guillen was supposed to show up in immigration court but never did. In August 2016, an immigration judge ordered him deported, but he never was.

Over 2,000 Americans were killed last year by illegal immigrants. In the years before Donald Trump was elected president, previous presidents and other leaders eagerly declared that "illegal immigration" is.... illegal. Read Bill Clinton's 1995 SOTU address regarding illegal immigration. He said "we're a nation of laws and this is wrong." He got a standing ovation from Congress which has flip-flopped purely out of the politics of hatefulness and intolerance.
 
Last edited:
smallvoice said:
Illegal immigrants are not innocent.
Click to expand...

Then your position is that if a person's papers are not in order he is not innocent?

Sounds like Nazi Germany in some way....
 
Mason66 said:
The law and department policy seem to be different.

Again, what would you have the officer do when he comes across somebody with a legally issued warrant from a judge?
Click to expand...

That depends largely on what the underlying charge for the bench (FTA) warrant is. Most will not take folks into custody for out of state traffic or other non-violent offenses (e.g. failure to pay child support). The reason for that policy is the local cost involved in processing and detaining the person (on an out of state bench warrant) will not be reimbursed combined with the low chance of the issuing state, county or city ever expending the effort to come and collect the person being held out of state.
 
smallvoice said:
IF that happened they would be in violation of our Second Amendment rights, and here in the US we have the right to defend them. China is in the bind they are in now, because they don't have that right.

IOW, your strawman has the same chance as a snowball in hell.
Click to expand...
My "straw man"?

A straw man is an invented, easily assailed argument, not a hypothetical situation.

As for your optimistic assessment, we shall see.
 
Thoreau72 said:
Then your position is that if a person's papers are not in order he is not innocent?

Sounds like Nazi Germany in some way....
Click to expand...

Quit attempting to smear and besmirch other people with your own misstatements and misinformation.
NOBODY BUT YOU said "if a person's papers are not in order..." NOBODY but you.

Illegals crossing our border HAVE no papers. They don't show up for court. Obama's idiotic "catch and release" scheme costs thousands of lives and billions of dollars, and the Democrats applaud it all for votes and divisiveness.
 
Thoreau72 said:
Then your position is that if a person's papers are not in order he is not innocent?

Sounds like Nazi Germany in some way....
Click to expand...

Did I say that in "some way"? Hardly. it's you you projecting what you want me to say. Illegal aliens are not innocent.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom