• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Republicans want whistleblower's sources, as inconsistencies in complaint emerge

Pound4abrown said:
I'm sure you will still be cracking-wise when the other shoe drops.
It will be fun to watch.
Click to expand...
You are correct! When Biden goes down I won't be able to contain my self. Dems shoot themselves in the foot again. :lamo
 
Are we supposed to believe that this latest attempt to remove Trump just came out of the blue? Dems knew nothing about it? LOL!

Seems to me it is just the next orchestrated, pre-planned attack by the left. This one’s almost over, it’s been pretty well exposed as a farce. They didn’t count on Trump releasing the transcript, it shows the complaint to be a bit false.

As I said after the last one, they’ll launch their next attack when they figure out this one’s done.


Sent from my iPhone XX Turbo using Tapacrap
 
yankintx said:
Divert all you want Righties. The proof is in the pudding, or in this case the phone transcript. Wow, this will not look good to the Indies, or those that value ethics in there President. You all best get used to hearing President Elect Biden or, wait for it, President Elect Warren.

Perhaps its time to give a woman a crack at the job!!
Click to expand...

:lamo :lamo :lamo

Riiiight, the transcript was so damning that Adam Schiff had open up the hearing with a totally made up account of the conversation between Trump and the Ukrainian President

When called on it, he called it " parody ". You can't make this **** up.
 
Anthony60 said:
Are we supposed to believe that this latest attempt to remove Trump just came out of the blue? Dems knew nothing about it? LOL!

Seems to me it is just the next orchestrated, pre-planned attack by the left. This one’s almost over, it’s been pretty well exposed as a farce. They didn’t count on Trump releasing the transcript, it shows the complaint to be a bit false.

As I said after the last one, they’ll launch their next attack when they figure out this one’s done.


Sent from my iPhone XX Turbo using Tapacrap
Click to expand...
Truth!
 
Airyaman said:
You do know that they will be interviewed by the House Intelligence Committee eventually, right? That's part of the process.
Click to expand...

Without information they won't know the good questions to ask or know if they're being lied to with the answers, right?
Plus, the interview might be in a closed hearing. That would be a bad idea, right?
And why not mention the Senate?
 
lwf said:
Why? No one blew the whistle on them.
Click to expand...

Leahy, Durbin, and Menendez threatened the Ukraine.

It's clear via emails and texts, they were operating in concert with other New Democratic Party members to protect Biden, and his corrupt actions endorsed by the Obama Administration.
 
Fenton said:
:lamo :lamo :lamo

Riiiight, the transcript was so damning that Adam Schiff had open up the hearing with a totally made up account of the conversation between Trump and the Ukrainian President

When called on it, he called it " parody ". You can't make this **** up.
Click to expand...
He should have called it his fantasy instead. :lamo He is a worthless lying sack of S***. And his performance just proves he is incapable of telling the truth.
 
roughdraft274 said:
What inconsistencies? This has been investigated and deemed credible and urgent by a Trump hand picked IG. This whole "rumor/hearsay/second hand" bull**** stops right at that point. If the police investigated a murder and they had people tell them that people have been saying that suspect A did it, and they found suspect A's fingerprints and DNA on the crime scene and the victims blood on his pants, the whole "it's just rumor" bull**** doesn't hold up.
Click to expand...

What do you think "credible" means in that context?
While we're at it, just what were they able to investigate since the transcript wasn't available then and the so-called whistleblower admitted he had no first hand knowledge of his claim.
 
Pound4abrown said:
I'm sure you will still be cracking-wise when the other shoe drops.
It will be fun to watch.
Click to expand...

The first shoe dropped ? When ? What's funny about this whole issue is it made the Democrats and specifically the Obama administration look worse

The video of Joe Biden bragging about leveraging 1 billion dollars in US aid unless the Ukrainian President fired their prosecutor would have been ignored

That prosecutor gave a sworn statement in an European Court and yesterday it was released. Talk about damning.
 
ocean515 said:
Leahy, Durbin, and Menendez threatened the Ukraine.

It's clear via emails and texts, they were operating in concert with other New Democratic Party members to protect Biden, and his corrupt actions endorsed by the Obama Administration.
Click to expand...

No matter how much you state it, there is zero evidence that there was any impropriety in Ukraine on the account of the Bidens and a mountain of evidence to the contrary. A very sad conspiracy theory to hitch your wagon to.
 
bubbabgone said:
Without information they won't know the good questions to ask or know if they're being lied to with the answers, right?
Plus, the interview might be in a closed hearing. That would be a bad idea, right?
And why not mention the Senate?
Click to expand...

Senate Intelligence can interview them as well. You realize there are Republicans on both committees, right?

But it appears that you believe people are willing to perjure themselves to get Trump. Why would anyone want to go to prison for that, are you nuts?

Yes, it should be in closed sessions to protect the identities of those involved.
 
Khayembii Communique said:
No matter how much you state it, there is zero evidence that there was any impropriety in Ukraine on the account of the Bidens and a mountain of evidence to the contrary. A very sad conspiracy theory to hitch your wagon to.
Click to expand...

No matter how many times you try to deny it, the facts prove Joe threatened the Ukraine to protect his son.

The evidence proving this keeps stacking up in writing.

I'm sure you'll find all that just as easy to ignore as the available facts have been for you.
 
OrphanSlug said:
Looks like Republicans are behind Trump wanting to eliminate the whistleblower.

As usual this looks horrible for Trump, and all Republicans have is “who told” and how fast can they be shut up by any means possible.
Click to expand...
Someone leaked private calls between the President and the President of Mexico, the Prime Minster of Australia and the President of Ukraine and you don't see that as a problem. Remember eventually there will be a Democrat President do you want the same thing to happen to her or him.
 
Airyaman said:
Senate Intelligence can interview them as well. You realize there are Republicans on both committees, right?

But it appears that you believe people are willing to perjure themselves to get Trump. Why would anyone want to go to prison for that, are you nuts?

Yes, it should be in closed sessions to protect the identities of those involved.
Click to expand...

What has perjury got to do with avoiding being asked important questions?
Should not be closed for something like this.
The Senate tends to do that more but the House shouldn't for a door they've already thrown open.
 
yankintx said:
Divert all you want Righties. The proof is in the pudding, or in this case the phone transcript. Wow, this will not look good to the Indies, or those that value ethics in there President. You all best get used to hearing President Elect Biden or, wait for it, President Elect Warren.

Perhaps its time to give a woman a crack at the job!!
Click to expand...

Divert?

I’m all for transparency. Trump released the letter.*

Now Democrats can show us what they were up to.

*It’s a bad precedent as world leaders might wonder whether they can be candid in the future.
 
zimmer said:
It’s time for some transparency. Let’s find out who was behind this latest coup attempt.

Let’s also have Schumer, Pelosi, Schiff and their staffs provide the last three months of their phone calls.
Click to expand...

Why does anyone think the whistleblower has sources in the relevant respect?
 
Khayembii Communique said:
There are zero facts that support this narrative. Zero.
Click to expand...

Keep telling yourself that. The facts prove otherwise. This farce invented by the New Democratic Party, and it's operatives is blowing up in their faces.

Couldn't happen to a more vile group of people.
 
bubbabgone said:
What has perjury got to do with avoiding being asked important questions?
Should not be closed for something like this.
The Senate tends to do that more but the House shouldn't for a door they've already thrown open.
Click to expand...

You mentioned people lying. That's known as "perjury" when done before Congress.
 
ocean515 said:
Keep telling yourself that. The facts prove otherwise. This farce invented by the New Democratic Party, and it's operatives (sic) is (sic) blowing up in their faces.
Click to expand...
too bad you didn't impeach Joe back then.

Couldn't happen to a more vile group of people.
Click to expand...
Love that absolutism, well done.
 
Airyaman said:
Senate Intelligence can interview them as well. You realize there are Republicans on both committees, right?

But it appears that you believe people are willing to perjure themselves to get Trump. Why would anyone want to go to prison for that, are you nuts?

Yes, it should be in closed sessions to protect the identities of those involved.
Click to expand...
After the Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee sat there and lied before the whole nation you will have to excuse my lack of confidence in what people will do in an effort to get Trump.
 
SLC said:
After the Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee sat there and lied before the whole nation you will have to excuse my lack of confidence in what people will do in an effort to get Trump.
Click to expand...

He didn't "lie", he added stupid (and unnecessary) parody. There was no intention to mislead. You people should keep your smelling salts and fainting couches close by for the next few months.
 
Airyaman said:
You mentioned people lying. That's known as "perjury" when done before Congress.
Click to expand...

You can't accuse someone of perjury if you can't show they lied.
 
I guess I pinged a few Righties with President Elect Warren. You all may have to get use to that. The Indies dont care about Conservative judges or gun rights, they want an adult in the WH.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom