• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Whistleblower's complaint is out

JANFU

JANFU

Land by the Gulf Stream
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Dec 27, 2014
Messages
59,432
Reaction score
38,998
Location
Best Coast Canada
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal
Live updates: Whistleblower'''s complaint is out - CNNPolitics

What we know so far

Whistleblower's complaint is out: It has been declassified and was just released. We are going through it now.
9 a.m. ET: Acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire is set to testify before the House Intelligence Committee.

5 min ago
Whistleblower said White House officials intervened to "lock down" records of July 25 call
Click to expand...

Not good times for Trump

Link to report

http://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2019/images/09/26/20190812_-_whistleblower_complaint_unclass.pdf


Cue the Subpoenas from the House
Barr, Rudy looselips along with a number of others
 
I don't care who you support, this is bad. Really bad. How many other illicit deals are hidden in protection systems they aren't supposed to be in?

Holy **** this is bad.
 
Given where we are and the contents of that whistleblower complaint, I do not see how Trump escapes this one.
 
sjmay said:
If that's all that's there...good luck.
Click to expand...

There's far more. The complaint details other illicit use of security systems to lock down conversations with other leaders, and with a president who actively admitted he would take foreign aid to win -this is done.

He's ****ed himself.
 
So no firsthand account and all hearsay by a highly biased source.
 
Last edited:
My impression of progressives for the past 3 years



Hair on fire! Hair on fire! CNN told me! Impeach, impeach, impeach.



Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
dobieg said:
So no firsthand account and all heresy by a highly biased source.
Click to expand...

Nonsense. The complaint was SPOT on with the transcript. Let's see all the other hidden transcripts Trump has illicitly sealed in archives not meant to protect him from himself.
 
trouble13 said:
My impression of progressives for the past 3 years



Hair on fire! Hair on fire! CNN told me! Impeach, impeach, impeach.



Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Does it feel good to cozy up this close to blatant, in your face corruption?

Does it?
 
Obscurity said:
I don't care who you support, this is bad. Really bad. How many other illicit deals are hidden in protection systems they aren't supposed to be in?

Holy **** this is bad.
Click to expand...


Liberal hysteria really doesn't move the needle much.


Again, no qui pro quo and no first hand account by the whistleblower. Not really sure what some think is there unless they're a hyper partisan weenie.
 
dobieg said:
So no firsthand account and all heresy by a highly biased source.
Click to expand...

Well that is the point of the impeachment process, to gather facts from witnesses. It is worth pursuing... what would you like the House to do? Ignore it and look the other way?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Obscurity said:
There's far more. The complaint details other illicit use of security systems to lock down conversations with other leaders, and with a president who actively admitted he would take foreign aid to win -this is done.

He's ****ed himself.
Click to expand...

I skimmed over that section, I will admit, but it's my understanding that the President's conversations with other leaders, are pretty much protected, private etc....so locking them down means....nothing....

It seems that out of all the converstaions he's had with other leaders, only one has been of concern to the whistleblower, or people who have told him about that one etc? Is that correct?
 
OrphanSlug said:
Given where we are and the contents of that whistleblower complaint, I do not see how Trump escapes this one.
Click to expand...

Hmm... has the thought of a nearly party line vote in the Senate (as happened with the Bill Clinton impeachment) not occured to you?
 
dobieg said:
So no firsthand account and all heresy by a highly biased source.
Click to expand...

Impeachment inquiry spearheaded by Pelosi before the phone call transcript, before the DNI testifies, before Barr testifies before the "whistleblower" transcript is released and before the "whistleblower' testifies as to his HEARSAY.
Democrats have burned any chance of taking this back. They are barreling headlong into an election on the ash heap of their failures, having done NOTHING for the American people.

They might as well run Honey Boo Boo in 2020, because they've sucked ALL the oxygen out of the room for their Democrat candidates.
 
Last edited:
dobieg said:
Liberal hysteria really doesn't move the needle much.


Again, no qui pro quo and no first hand account by the whistleblower. Not really sure what some think is there unless they're a hyper partisan weenie.
Click to expand...

Yawwn. Keep clinging to that defense. This is bad, and if it were a democrat, you'd be howling at the moon. So please, spare us. We don't need to see your continued meltdown.
 
Guess what?

Honest presidents don't have to hide records because honest presidents don't do things that incriminate them.

The cult is doing everything they can to distract, gaslight and muddy the waters, because they are scared, and because to them, protecting cult leader is more important than this nation's interests.
 
ttwtt78640 said:
Hmm... has the thought of a nearly party line vote in the Senate (as happened with the Bill Clinton impeachment) not occured to you?
Click to expand...

Of course it has, but I doubt that is what happens in the House.

More importantly this becomes a new political litmus test for Republicans in Congress, are they willing to support a President who tried to benefit politically by applying pressure to a foreign nation for an investigation into a rival and also try to cover up the conversation breaking several protocols?
 
OrphanSlug said:
Of course it has, but I doubt that is what happens in the House.

More importantly this becomes a new political litmus test for Republicans in Congress, are they willing to support a President who tried to benefit politically by applying pressure to a foreign nation for an investigation into a rival and also try to cover up the conversation breaking several protocols?
Click to expand...

Subjective and conjecture.
 
Obscurity said:
Yawwn. Keep clinging to that defense. This is bad, and if it were a democrat, you'd be howling at the moon. So please, spare us. We don't need to see your continued meltdown.
Click to expand...


lolol

I'm not the political hack getting my panties all in a bunch over the 3rd hand account of some weenie liberal.
 
sjmay said:
I skimmed over that section, I will admit, but it's my understanding that the President's conversations with other leaders, are pretty much protected, private etc....so locking them down means....nothing....

It seems that out of all the converstaions he's had with other leaders, only one has been of concern to the whistleblower, or people who have told him about that one etc? Is that correct?
Click to expand...

This "locking down" of the conversation was to place it on a separate server from where they are usually stored.
 
As I said in the other thread:

The Whistleblower Complaint has been released: 404 - File or directory not found.

Reading the complaint, it is incredibly clear the President is absolutely corrupt. The fact White House officials placed the call transcript between Trump and Zelensky in the super secret database, in violation of established protocols, shows the White House KNEW what happened was wrong.

The President is betraying our country. His campaign was proven to have worked with Russia (and other countries) to win the 2016 election, he has obstructed justice, he is an unindicted co-conspirator for a crime Trump's personal attorney is currently in jail for and now we have explicit proof (not evidence, proof) of Trump trying to leverage US policy against Ukraine for his personal benefit by trying to create a scandal (which has repeatedly been debunked) against his very likely 2020 presidential election rival.

Why Republicans still support him, I do not understand. They could toss him to the curb, nominate Pence for President and probably win. Their insistence on backing Trump is true cowardice.
dobieg said:
I'm not the political hack
Click to expand...
LOL

Ok. :lol:
 
ttwtt78640 said:
Hmm... has the thought of a nearly party line vote in the Senate (as happened with the Bill Clinton impeachment) not occured to you?
Click to expand...

Of course it has occurred.

But this is so much worse than someone lying to cover up sexual indiscretion.

If this isn't enough to make the GOP lose their lockstep support of Trump, then let that be recorded in history and emblazoned in every campaign ad for the next decade.
 
Obscurity said:
Does it feel good to cozy up this close to blatant, in your face corruption?

Does it?
Click to expand...

They don't care. The guy could literally shoot someone in times square and their response would be "And"?
 
Airyaman said:
This "locking down" of the conversation was to place it on a separate server from where they are usually stored.
Click to expand...

And? Is there a law saying that's not permissible?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom