• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

NYT updates Kavanaugh 'bombshell' to note accuser doesn't recall alleged assault

Ouroboros said:
Unfortunately, I think Trump's decided that Twitter is his easiest means of feeding his base, and they want to see him punching it out with the people they don't like.
Click to expand...

Probably closer to the truth. The media supporting the left has lost all credibility as far as I am concerned. I put more faith in the National Enquirer.
 
Aberration said:
I never said there were not other ways. That doesn’t mean the chosen way mean conservatives hate women. That’s an irrational leap of logic.
Click to expand...

Why are you telling me? Tell the person who said it, who wasn't me.
 
EMNofSeattle said:
Nothing described in that, except maybe the grabbing a penis belong to a one Mr.Kavanaugh, is sexual assault.

You’re the embodiment of the “I told a feminist she has a nice smile and my trial starts on Monday” joke
Click to expand...

I wasn't talking about Kavanaugh; and I wasn't talking to you. If you're going to jump into my face and lob an amateur insult at a person you've never spoken to in your life, then try not to look like a complete dip**** while doing it.
 
smallvoice said:
It's just as bad to call whores "powerful women" when you like them. I believe that is the case here.
Click to expand...

Thank you for offering yourself as an unwanted example of what I was criticizing. Your contribution is noted.
 
VanceMack said:
So all the idiotic **** you say about loving Trump is just that. Shocking...
Click to expand...

Didn't you get the memo, if you are not full on the Bernie/AOC Train and hating on Trump in at least 70% of your posts, even if the thread has NOTHING TO DO WITH Trump, that mean's your a Trump loving nazi white supremacist who hates America, Children and anyone not Blonde Haired and Blue Eyed. Or orange in the case of Trump...

TDS rotted the brains of some formerly good folks.
 
tres borrachos said:
You supported Obama when he held the Presidency? I wonder why it is that I can't remember that.
Click to expand...
Because you are myopic and have no capacity to see anything other than what suits your particular bent in the particular moment.
 
W_Heisenberg said:
They corrected the article. They did it within 24 hours. That seems legit to me.
Click to expand...

Problem is, they have journalism backwards. Now days, they just put it our there and hope it sticks. Retractions were rare decades ago, because the consequence for posting bad information was termination of your job.

-VySky
 
Trump said:
unless its Trump then its every Dems business...:doh
Click to expand...

I didn't care who Trump cheated with before he was president. I barely care now. I only care that the Republican party has the gall to claim a moral high ground and pretend (at least in the past) to be the party of "family values". If we want to elect a person like Trump, so be it, but then let's stop pretending we care about decency, fidelity, morality, and honesty. If we don't want it all, then we can't claim to have it.
 
zimmer said:
Title was perfectly accurate.
Click to expand...

No. I mean I could walk you through it if you really need me to, but I thought my previous explanation was succinct enough.
 
zimmer said:
And Kamala should know better, as she knows about taking dick.

I wonder, why has the Goebbels Media given her a pass for ****ing her way forward?
Click to expand...

Spoken like the true deplorable that you are. Goebbels would be proud of you.
 
haymarket said:
Yes, I would like a cheese and pepperoni and two ten year olds to go please. Do you deliver? :roll::shock:
Click to expand...

You still believe pizzagate huh?
 
Scarab said:
I didn't care who Trump cheated with before he was president. I barely care now. I only care that the Republican party has the gall to claim a moral high ground and pretend (at least in the past) to be the party of "family values". If we want to elect a person like Trump, so be it, but then let's stop pretending we care about decency, fidelity, morality, and honesty. If we don't want it all, then we can't claim to have it.
Click to expand...

think that ship sailed when Bill Clinton got caught with his cigar in the cookie jar....and his rape victims came forward.
 
Trump said:
think that ship sailed when Bill Clinton got caught with his cigar in the cookie jar....and his rape victims came forward.
Click to expand...

Of course. Bill Clinton. He's a pig too. For some of the same but not as many reasons as Trump's a pig. Lest you forget, the Democratic party never pretended to be a collective of pious, God-fearing, Bible abiding crusaders carrying the cross for Christ. Both major political parties are infested with terrible people and they are both hypocritical, but the Republicans really disappointed me when they sold their souls to Trump, Inc.
 
Ouroboros said:
Unfortunately, I think Trump's decided that Twitter is his easiest means of feeding his base, and they want to see him punching it out with the people they don't like.
Click to expand...

...and I'm all for him "punching it out" with the MSM and the rest of the liberals/progressives/spineless undisclosed. It appears that he is purporting himself well.
 
Scarab said:
Thank you for offering yourself as an unwanted example of what I was criticizing. Your contribution is noted.
Click to expand...

No one needs your approval. Your lack of contribution is also noted.
 
smallvoice said:
No one needs your approval. Your lack of contribution is also noted.
Click to expand...

I didn't say you needed my approval. I typed two sentences. They aren't difficult to understand. You may not like my contribution, but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
 
Scarab said:
I didn't say you needed my approval. I typed two sentences. They aren't difficult to understand. You may not like my contribution, but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
Click to expand...

I never intimated that it "didn't exist", but then your opinion of an "unwanted example" is irrelevant. If you put nonsense on the forum, you should expect to be called on it.
 
Anyone happen to catch the authors of this story on The View today? Criminey are they ever in damage control.

They still stick by their no-proof story, but the lead author then said that other than that report that couldn't be corroborated, they found nothing at all in the last 36 years to show Kavanaugh as anything but a upright, outstanding judge and champion of women in the legal field.

Well, then...
 
Yep I saw a commentator say a serial sexual assaulter does not change. OK then I'd like to see some sexual assault stories in the last three decades. Everything that I have seen is that he is a champion of women and a exemplary boss and mentor. even Ruth Bader Ginsburg has nothing bad to say about him.
 
smallvoice said:
I never intimated that it "didn't exist", but then your opinion of an "unwanted example" is irrelevant. If you put nonsense on the forum, you should expect to be called on it.
Click to expand...

Yes, you did. If you're going to talk to me, I'm not going to let you play silly games. These are your exact words:

Your lack of contribution is also noted.

Now, I don't particularly care what you think is irrelevant since your batting zero in your interaction with me, but I'll let you tell me what nonsense I posted. Go ahead.
 
Ouroboros said:
As the next post clearly shows, the allegation was never that Kavanaugh himself shoved his junk in someone's face.
Click to expand...

What do you mean never? That was Ramirez' allegation and it dates back over a year. ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom