• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

NYT updates Kavanaugh 'bombshell' to note accuser doesn't recall alleged assault

tres borrachos said:
Vance goes out on DP sponsored vacations because he gets angry. It starts with the asterisk filled posts. Then it morphs into meltdowns for all to see.
Click to expand...
:lamo

And yet you failed miserably to demonstrate even one time that I have defended Trumps character.

Not once.

You cant support your lies. As bad as Trump is...you are worse. And you know what must REALLY suck for you right now? You know I'm right.
 
Superfly said:
I

She’s also a black woman. The trifecta of hate for certain knuckle staggers. She’s black, she’s a woman and she’s a Democrat.
Click to expand...

Imagine if she was a gay Muslim too. That's a five-legged stool that would never tip over.
 
W_Heisenberg said:
This is not okay. You wonder why people suspect Conservatives hate women.
Click to expand...

For real. All politics aside, that's a grotesque way to talk about a woman you never met in front of a bunch of people you don't know (the general you, of course).
 
W_Heisenberg said:
This is not okay. You wonder why people suspect Conservatives hate women.
Click to expand...

You guys do it all the time. Quit pretend criticism of someone’s character and actions is sexism simply because she is a woman.
 
Aberration said:
You guys do it all the time. Quit pretend criticism of someone’s character and actions is sexism simply because she is a woman.
Click to expand...

That's kind of the problem here, isn't it? She didn't do anything wrong that would reflect poorly on her character. So why bring it up?

I know this might sound shocking to you, but women get to have sex with whomever they want, and if two consenting adults want to have sex with each other, it's really none of your business.
 
Aberration said:
You guys do it all the time. Quit pretend criticism of someone’s character and actions is sexism simply because she is a woman.
Click to expand...

Believe it or not, there are ways of criticizing someone's character and actions without talking about how she "spread her legs to get ahead". Unless I made a wrong turn and landed on Trump's ***** grabber van, I can think of less caustic, more mature ways to criticize Harris.
 
W_Heisenberg said:
That's kind of the problem here, isn't it? She didn't do anything wrong that would reflect poorly on her character. So why bring it up?

I know this might sound shocking to you, but women get to have sex with whomever they want, and if two consenting adults want to have sex with each other, it's really none of your business.
Click to expand...

unless its Trump then its every Dems business...:doh
 
Even if the story were 100% true and on video it is simply irrelevant to being a judge.

What’s really funny is it’s the wacky socialist left who created a society where unchaperoned and unmarried men and women can get together and get drunk and commit debauchery and it’s accepted as normal so why do they even care?
 
EMNofSeattle said:
Even if the story were 100% true and on video it is simply irrelevant to being a judge.

What’s really funny is it’s the wacky socialist left who created a society where unchaperoned and unmarried men and women can get together and get drunk and commit debauchery and it’s accepted as normal so why do they even care?
Click to expand...

Debauchery isn't a crime. Sexual assault is.
 
W_Heisenberg said:
Why does it have to come from personal experience? And why would my personal experience be important? Wouldn't it be better to rely on objective facts, and also the personal experiences of a wider sample group?

None of us are omniscient, but there is no evidence Obama committed tax fraud, bilked his contractors, defrauded his investors and banks, declared bankruptcy multiple times, cheated on his wife with a porn star, and consistently lied to the American people. Obama's policies and decision-making process were generally always moderate and thoughtful. Obama was nearly always polite to people, whether they be strangers, friends, or opponents. Obama was dignified at all times. He was educated. He was kind. He was successful at his most important task, which was to improve the economy and improve the general wellbeing of his fellow citizens. Obama pursued our national interests over those of his personal interests. We cannot say the same for Trump at this point.

I'm a moderate, and I don't agree with everything Obama did, but I think Obama was a good person and one of our better Presidents.
Click to expand...

YOu said he is a good person. You couldn't know that unless you knew him personally.

The rest of us have only seen what he wanted to present to us in public.

So how long have you known him, and if you haven't, obviously you don't know he is a good person or not.
 
Scarab said:
Believe it or not, there are ways of criticizing someone's character and actions without talking about how she "spread her legs to get ahead". Unless I made a wrong turn and landed on Trump's ***** grabber van, I can think of less caustic, more mature ways to criticize Harris.
Click to expand...

I never said there were not other ways. That doesn’t mean the chosen way mean conservatives hate women. That’s an irrational leap of logic.
 
W_Heisenberg said:
That's kind of the problem here, isn't it? She didn't do anything wrong that would reflect poorly on her character. So why bring it up?
Click to expand...

Because her action were in fact wrong and do reflect poorly on her character.

W_Heisenberg said:
I know this might sound shocking to you, but women get to have sex with whomever they want, and if two consenting adults want to have sex with each other, it's really none of your business.
Click to expand...

I know this might sound shock to you, but you can express your opinion without lying about someone else’s.

No where. Ever. Have I suggested women don’t get to have sex with whomever they want. It is my business when she wants to be a public servant.
 
EMNofSeattle said:
Even if the story were 100% true and on video it is simply irrelevant to being a judge.

What’s really funny is it’s the wacky socialist left who created a society where unchaperoned and unmarried men and women can get together and get drunk and commit debauchery and it’s accepted as normal so why do they even care?
Click to expand...
The bolded is really funny. As though “the left” has any monopoly on anything you mentioned. What are you going to post when, not if the next conservative gets caught in a compromising situation?

“Unchaperoned and unmarried women getting together?” Are you a time traveler from the Middle Ages, or is your name Pence?

What a raft of crap!
 
Ouroboros said:
I don't believe Ford, but she wasn't the source of the infamous "white slavery" story.
Click to expand...

I didn't say that she did. Not sure what you're talking about.
 
VanceMack said:
:lamo

And yet you failed miserably to demonstrate even one time that I have defended Trumps character.

Not once.

You cant support your lies. As bad as Trump is...you are worse. And you know what must REALLY suck for you right now? You know I'm right.
Click to expand...

Just post "I love Trump". It would be more honest. And more interesting.
 
EMNofSeattle said:
Even if the story were 100% true and on video it is simply irrelevant to being a judge.

What’s really funny is it’s the wacky socialist left who created a society where unchaperoned and unmarried men and women can get together and get drunk and commit debauchery and it’s accepted as normal so why do they even care?
Click to expand...

Is that you, Jim Bob Duggar?
 
Rexedgar said:
The bolded is really funny. As though “the left” has any monopoly on anything you mentioned. What are you going to post when, not if the next conservative gets caught in a compromising situation?

“Unchaperoned and unmarried women getting together?” Are you a time traveler from the Middle Ages, or is your name Pence?

What a raft of crap!
Click to expand...

Especially since the “right” are the ones defending that behavior.
 
Scarab said:
Debauchery isn't a crime. Sexual assault is.
Click to expand...

Nothing described in that, except maybe the grabbing a penis belong to a one Mr.Kavanaugh, is sexual assault.

You’re the embodiment of the “I told a feminist she has a nice smile and my trial starts on Monday” joke
 
tres borrachos said:
Just post "I love Trump". It would be more honest. And more interesting.
Click to expand...
Find even ONE post where I have defended his character and you wont keep making yourself look stupid and dishonest.

Just one.
 
zimmer said:
The Goebbels Media strikes out again.

Trump has exposed and broken the insane Democrats and their Goebbels Media wing.
Click to expand...

th
 
cpwill said:
Uh, I think "Oh, by the way, the person whom we claimed was victimized by a SCOTUS Justice in fact has no memory of the event" is a pretty BFD, in regards to this story. False stories, like this one, always run ahead of their corrections, and that's been the story of the entire, idiotic, lurid, disgusting mess around accusations against Kavanaugh.

This would sort of be like "[Insert Whomever Is The Democrat Candidate in 2020 here] RAPES CHILDREN*"


It turns out that we knew at the time there was no evidence for this claim. We apologize for the oversight, but you should still give us full props for self-critical honesty because we are saying it now.



How in the everloving f*** an entity that looks on itself as a "Media" organization like the Times can run this story without bothering to find out whether or not the alleged victim even thinks it happened....


....well, it should be astonishing. But it isn't, anymore :-/





You know, as a Conservative who loathes what Trump has done to the GOP and the "Conservative" movement writ large, and who gets into arguments with Trump fans on a regular basis, it sure would be a lot easier to push back on Trumpkin claims about the media if the media didn't keep validating them.
Click to expand...

Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly now say it was there in the beginning, and removed by editors. We'll never know, I guess. But talk about massive blunders. :roll:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom