• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:138]Government watchdog details severe trauma suffered by separated children

HumblePi said:
[h=1]Government watchdog details severe trauma suffered by separated children[/h]Government watchdog details severe trauma suffered by separated children | TheHill
Migrant children separated from their parents through the Trump administration’s “zero tolerance” policy experienced more severe mental trauma than children who were not separated, according to a government watchdog report.
Click to expand...

So to do children who are citizens when their parents are arrested for regular crimes.
 
noonereal said:
This is common ****in sense. We need report for this?

This is exactly why Trump did it.

I would not want to be him on judgement day.
Click to expand...

I hope we're all around to see judgement day for him, in our courts.
 
dixon01767 said:
So to do children who are citizens when their parents are arrested for regular crimes.
Click to expand...

That's okay, justify this as you have been all along with everything else. There's a higher power judging you than myself, that's for sure.
 
HumblePi said:
That's okay, justify this as you have been all along with everything else. There's a higher power judging you than myself, that's for sure.
Click to expand...

Oh stop it. The pictures of kids in cages separated from their parents was during the Obama administration. It was bad then and bad now but both done according to the law.
 
Thoreau72 said:
As private individuals and citizens both you and I have the power and duty to pass such judgments. Criminal behavior by high elected and appointed officials should concern citizens.

In accordance with the spirit of the First Amendment, it should also concern our press. That it does not simply illustrates how corrupt the system is.

Our judgments will mean nothing within the system, further illustrating how corrupt things are. It does seem we have the government we deserve.
Click to expand...

Judgment and consensus are two separate things at this point. Seeing as he was either found to not actually have perjured himself, or they found no reasonable evidence t convicted him of such. It should've just ended there.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom