• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Former Canadian PM says she's 'rooting for a direct hit' of Hurricane Dorian on Mar-a-Lago

I hope it misses everyone. Florida isnt out of the woods yet either. Hurricane's paths are difficult to predict.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Absolutely!
 
I was going to say obamas new house lol

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

I think I mentioned that in the thread earlier.
It didn't go over well. ;)
 
What she said was thoughtless and in poor taste she has since apologized and people should accept that. She made a mistake, her mouth wrote a check her ass could not cash. Leave it at that and move on.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Naah, she just said out loud what A LOT OF OTHER people were quietly thinking to themselves as well. This is what happens when you elect a President who speaks, acts,and has all the uneducated attributes of a hateful and insolent 8th grader.
 
Whatever you are attempting to say to me is not working.
You have brought nothing to this thread but ad hominem fallacy.

Feel proud?

Of course it is not working....because you continue to play your game of trying to create a **** storm and then standing back and blaming everyone else. Very Trumpian when you get right down to it. Feel proud?

I am quite confident that you cannot find a single instance of this ad hominem fallacy you stake your rep on.
 
Naah, she just said out loud what A LOT OF OTHER people were quietly thinking to themselves as well. This is what happens when you elect a President who speaks, acts,and has all the uneducated attributes of a hateful and insolent 8th grader.
Im sure you will understand if it heads up the coast far enough that people start openly hoping it hits obamas new home.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
Do you imagine that this entire thread was not about Trump? Maybe you came in late?

It has been all about Trump since the day he announced he was running for POTUS.

And it has remained all about Trump until this day and will continue to be all about Trump into the future.

Didn't come in late. Been reading from the beginning.

Kim Campbell tweeted and the News caught wind of it...

Her 1st tweet she mentions the hurricane and Mar-a-Lago.

After reading critical tweets to her tweet

She tweeted again and mentions Puerto Rico, Trump, climate change (which is making hurricanes more destructive)

So, Kim Campbell brought Trump into the mix... Not Trix.

Also, there were several posters who made it all about Trump. But that is a normal practice now.

So, what's your point?

Roseann:)
 
Naah, she just said out loud what A LOT OF OTHER people were quietly thinking to themselves as well. This is what happens when you elect a President who speaks, acts,and has all the uneducated attributes of a hateful and insolent 8th grader.

I am sure you're quite proud of the above.
At least Campbell apologized for thinking out loud.
Yourself?
 
Im sure you will understand if it heads up the coast far enough that people start openly hoping it hits obamas new home.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

I'm sure there are cretins who would like nothing more than to see Obama's new home washed out to sea.

Sick bastards.
 
It has been all about Trump since the day he announced he was running for POTUS.

And it has remained all about Trump until this day and will continue to be all about Trump into the future.

Didn't come in late. Been reading from the beginning.

Kim Campbell tweeted and the News caught wind of it...

Her 1st tweet she mentions the hurricane and Mar-a-Lago.

After reading critical tweets to her tweet

She tweeted again and mentions Puerto Rico, Trump, climate change (which is making hurricanes more destructive)

So, Kim Campbell brought Trump into the mix... Not Trix.


Also, there were several posters who made it all about Trump. But that is a normal practice now.

So, what's your point?

Roseann:)

Stop being so factual, my friend.
The Trump haters aren't going to appreciate it.
Her point? Misplaced anger, and that's par for the course with some.
 
It has been all about Trump since the day he announced he was running for POTUS.

And it has remained all about Trump until this day and will continue to be all about Trump into the future.

Didn't come in late. Been reading from the beginning.

Kim Campbell tweeted and the News caught wind of it...

Her 1st tweet she mentions the hurricane and Mar-a-Lago.

After reading critical tweets to her tweet

She tweeted again and mentions Puerto Rico, Trump, climate change (which is making hurricanes more destructive)

So, Kim Campbell brought Trump into the mix... Not Trix.

Also, there were several posters who made it all about Trump. But that is a normal practice now.

So, what's your point?

Roseann:)

It's a very simple point: First Post:
This is taking TDS to a new level....Who in their right mind thinks like this? How can anyone be so hateful to wish a hurricane hits a Trump owned property?

In the very first post Trix brings up Trump and Kim Campell.

You replied to me that you would ignore my post because I played the Trump card. I asked if you doubted that the thread was about Trump. You somehow find a way to claim that it is not. So what is the game you are playing?
 
Similarly to many earlier replies to this thread. I cringed at reading how many think Trump deserved to be hit by Dorian, just shameful.

Maybe you can find a pearl clutching gif? It will come in handy.
 
I am sure you're quite proud of the above.
At least Campbell apologized for thinking out loud.
Yourself?

If it were possible to take a poll on it. I'm pretty sure it would come out pretty much just the same as any poll dealing with Trump would. With the usual 30% to the 'at the very most' , on an especially good day, 40% supporting him. With at least 60% and more who don't support him on any given day. Gee, I'm starting to feel a little sorry for you. It can't be easy defending a flaming asshole on a near 24/7 basis. Face it, ma'am. You've got your work cut out for you. Fortunately for you, you seem to have a lot of time on your hands to devote to the effort.
 
Last edited:
This begs the question... have you ever met a conservative American from this forum, who was unfriendly to you IRL?

You are a Trump supporter, correct? As such, I consider you much more than a 'conservative' rino who might appear friendly. I consider you an alt-right sister-in-arms, and I hope you extend the same courtesy to me save inserting brother for sister. We are alt-right after all, and men rule.
 
You are a Trump supporter, correct? As such, I consider you much more than a 'conservative' rino who might appear friendly. I consider you an alt-right sister-in-arms, and I hope you extend the same courtesy to me save inserting brother for sister. We are alt-right after all, and men rule.

I noticed you ignored my question...
 
If it were possible to take a poll on it. I'm pretty sure it would come out pretty much just the same as any poll dealing with Trump would. With the usual 30% to the 'at the very most' , on an especially good day, 40% supporting him. With at least 60% and more who don't support him on any given day. Gee, I'm starting to feel a little sorry for you. It can't be easy defending a flaming asshole on a near 24/7 basis. Face it, ma'am. You've got your work cut out for you. Fortunately for you, you seem to have a lot of time on your hands to devote to the effort.

I'm down.
 
It was suggested that I read this entire thread. I have done so, have concluded that I now fear for the future survival of a species as intellectually dishonest and vapid as human beings.

I feel personally ashamed, and apologize to Canadian posters who attempted to enlighten their southern neighbors, only to be met by rude ignorance.

I wish I'd driven by this train-wreck; I recommend others get out now, while they still possess a vestige of their dignity...and sanity.

:inandout:
 
If it were possible to take a poll on it. I'm pretty sure it would come out pretty much just the same as any poll dealing with Trump would. With the usual 30% to the 'at the very most' , on an especially good day, 40% supporting him. With at least 60% and more who don't support him on any given day. Gee, I'm starting to feel a little sorry for you. It can't be easy defending a flaming asshole on a near 24/7 basis. Face it, ma'am. You've got your work cut out for you. Fortunately for you, you seem to have a lot of time on your hands to devote to the effort.

Why are you so angry and upset with people who don't go along with your Trump hate?
Why do you delude yourself into believing that this is my problem?
 
White liberals are more hateful than typical white or black racists.

I'm not touching the above; racism.

I think there are far more white leftists that are more hateful than white and black liberals but that would take some to actually think out of the box to acknowledge.
 
I noticed you ignored my question...

I have only met you, Bullseye and Cletus, so that is a small sample. So small I was hesitant to make a call. Furthermore, I am hesitant to call you and Bullseye conservative since I don't want to offend either of you. You two are three of the friends I have in real life, and I don't have many more for obvious reasons.
 
Back
Top Bottom