• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

'Melania's ready to risk it all': first lady's Trudeau encounter delights internet

Lovebug said:
in other love affairs

SQPVMTCSQAI6TPNXIT4URTAGAU.jpg


seal-harvey-weinstein-oprah-winfrey.jpg
Click to expand...

If you sincerely believe those looks are in the same ballpark as the look Melania gave Trudeau, I feel truly sorry for someone that has led such a life.

But the fun part is the juxtaposition, Trump being so obviously pissed. The two main women in his life are giving looks to Justin that Trump himself wants so badly. It clearly drives him crazy. :lamo
 
Last edited:
Praxas said:
Agreed, this is one case where the story doesn't match the reality of the picture.
Click to expand...

People ougth to leave the first lady alone, but they cannot make themselves because they hate so much.
 
Vern said:
oh A60, its pretty funny you don't understand what I posted. Sure its typical but still funny. let me type this slowly. You whined "wah wah they never did that to Obama". I posted a thread started by jmac that shows they did exactly that. Hatuey posted some other examples.

Now A, the reason your brain "tricked" you into not understanding my clear point is that you posted something false. As a conservative, you don't have the integrity to admit you were wrong so your brain "misparaphrases" my post so you don't have deal with reality.
Click to expand...

Well, looks like it's you that doesn't understand. I exposed how those are not the same. Again, what is the basis of the story saying Melania is willing "to risk it all" for Trueau? I typed really slowly for you.

Also, you believe that conservatives can not have integrity. That's a dumb statement, but maybe you want to try and defend the twisted logic behind that one too.
 
j-mac said:
I had nothing to do with this thread, and still don't other than to ask you this particular question...I am however glad to see that I get under your skin so....I can't control what triggers you, nor can I stop liberals today from being the way they are....if you have a problem in the future with what I post, you can either address in the thread it was posted, report it, or pm me to discuss it, but posting an unrelated post, in a thread to bait me will from this point on be ignored, or reported. Regardless of whatever dumbass point you think your making.
Click to expand...

Well said!
 
Integrityrespec said:
People ougth to leave the first lady alone, but they cannot make themselves because they hate so much.
Click to expand...

Oh come ON now!!!

Do you want to destroy the entire American political culture?

Heck, the next thing that you'll be demanding (in your highly anti-First Amendment campaign) is that people leave the President's kids alone, and then the President's siblings and/or parents, and then the President's Aunts/Uncles and/or Nieces/Nephews, and then the President's in-laws, and then the people who know any of the foregoing, and then the people who went to school with any of the foregoing.

Don't you realize that revealing the private lives of the President's spouse, and the President's kids, and the President's siblings and/or parents, and the President's Aunts/Uncles and/or Nieces/Nephews, and the President's in-laws, that the people who know any of the foregoing, that the people who went to school with any of the foregoing IS ESSENTIAL TO THE PRESERVATION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA since all of those people tell the President of the United States of America what to do and the President of the United States of America is 100% responsible for everything that those people do?
 
TU Curmudgeon said:
From The Guardian

'Melania's ready to risk it all': first lady's Trudeau encounter delights internet
​

A photograph from the weekend G7 summit in France of Melania Trump greeting Canada’s prime minister, Justin Trudeau, has gone viral, with online commenters joking about the encounter.

A series of photographs, taken by a European Pressphoto Agency photographer as world leaders and their spouses came together on Sunday evening for a “family photo” to conclude the summit, show a smiling first lady greeting Trudeau.

The apparent warmth of the scene, not out of place in a diplomatic setting of its kind, nevertheless captured the imaginations of many.

COMMENT:-

The obvious love and affection shown between "Individual 1" and "Wife 3" should warm the cockles of the hearts of all true believers in the sanctity of marriage.
​
Click to expand...

Melania is an empty dress. Here’s her contribution as First Tart:

793E7279-1ACA-4778-896C-131CB4565C37.jpeg

Here’s what’s inside her dress:

A4ED926E-2E1E-488C-8625-46B1B0FD430B.jpg
 
Anthony60 said:
Well, looks like it's you that doesn't understand. I exposed how those are not the same. Again, what is the basis of the story saying Melania is willing "to risk it all" for Trueau? I typed really slowly for you.

Also, you believe that conservatives can not have integrity. That's a dumb statement, but maybe you want to try and defend the twisted logic behind that one too.
Click to expand...

Anthony, we’re not having the same conversation. You’re discussing things you imagined or discussed with other people. You’ve “exposed” nothing to me but your inability to process reality. you clearly “exposed” that you don’t understand the title. “Melania is ready to risk it all” was one of many hilarious tweets concerning the photo. That and other tweets did “delight the internet”. When your conservative masters did that to President Obama, they weren’t trying to be funny. Oh and you also “exposed” that you thought I thought Jmac wrote for the guardian. Now lets review.

You posted “wah wah they never did that to President Obama”
I posted a thread started by jmac that shows they did.

As far as integrity goes, conservatives routinely cut and run from any discussion where they start to realize their beliefs are false. Case in point, not one conservative has explained how he foamed at the mouth about deficits under President Obama (that he inherited) now sit quietly as trump balloons the deficit. Here’s a discussion I had with Ludin who cut and ran after posting falsehoods and gibberish. I’ve called him back several times but I’m guessing he’s finally realized he’s posted falsehoods and gibberish and decided to cut and run rather than show integrity.

ludin said:
No you haven't. yes we know that leftist love to point the blame of their issues on other people. So year 1 obama was in office the deficit went from 200b to 400b that was the bush stuff you are talking about.
from 2017,2018,2019 all of the budgets etc that came were straight from obama and the democrats. hell i will even give you a pass on 2017. that is still 2 years of obama administration running up the deficit by trillions of dollars. Bush was not president. Bush was not setting the budgets or spending the money. That was the democrats and obama.
no amount of history revisionism will get you out of these facts.

No what i said was you didn't have an issue with obama's years of trillion dollar deficits so you shouldn't have a problem now. we know you are going to be dishonest but do not reword what i said.
it is already there in black and white.

You haven't you have posted history revisionism. that is what the failure is.
obama and the democrats were in control of congress. Actually i have plenty of facts.
Who was the president? bush or obama?
who was in charge of congress? republicans are democrats?
who signed the YEARLY budget bills? it has to be the president which would be obama.
those are facts.
we know we know you have to always point blame. obama tried it but after year 1 you own it.
Click to expand...
Since your concerned about integrity and accountability, tell your fellow conservative to stop cutting and running from reality. Start with ludin
 
Okay, so you got a lot wrong. It's always worth a laugh when someone makes a smug post, and then is wrong. But hey, we all do it. Just some more than others.

Vern said:
Anthony, we’re not having the same conversation. You’re discussing things you imagined or discussed with other people. You’ve “exposed” nothing to me but your inability to process reality. you clearly “exposed” that you don’t understand the title. “Melania is ready to risk it all” was one of many hilarious tweets concerning the photo. That and other tweets did “delight the internet”. When your conservative masters did that to President Obama, they weren’t trying to be funny. Oh and you also “exposed” that you thought I thought Jmac wrote for the guardian. Now lets review.
Click to expand...
Okay, so right off the bat, the OP was a link to a piece in the Guardian, not a tweet. A major, though leftist, publication. Significant difference.

Then, do you know what the internet is? What is the criteria to determine when the "internet" is "delighted"? I'd dare say you'd be more accurate to say that the Trump haters were delighted. I'm on the internet, I wasn't delighted. I don't care much about that type of leftist noise.
You posted “wah wah they never did that to President Obama”
I posted a thread started by jmac that shows they did.
Click to expand...
Yes. The link goes to Yahoo News. No picture of Obama. No article saying he was going to leave his wife for this woman. Update that, if you can.
As far as integrity goes, conservatives routinely cut and run from any discussion where they start to realize... blah, blah, blah.
Click to expand...
Okay, so you can't back that up either, just gibberish. No surprise there.
Since your concerned about integrity and accountability, tell your fellow conservative to stop cutting and running from reality. Start with ludin
Click to expand...
No need, it's not a hive mind, like the left. You got schooled anyway.
 
Anthony60 said:
Well, looks like it's you that doesn't understand. I exposed how those are not the same. Again, what is the basis of the story saying Melania is willing "to risk it all" for Trueau? I typed really slowly for you.

Also, you believe that conservatives can not have integrity. That's a dumb statement, but maybe you want to try and defend the twisted logic behind that one too.
Click to expand...

there is no point in talking to these people.
they have auto-deflect and auto-hypocrisy on.
 
Anthony60 said:
Okay, so you got a lot wrong. It's always worth a laugh when someone makes a smug post, and then is wrong. But hey, we all do it. Just some more than others.

Okay, so right off the bat, the OP was a link to a piece in the Guardian, not a tweet. A major, though leftist, publication. Significant difference.

Then, do you know what the internet is? What is the criteria to determine when the "internet" is "delighted"? I'd dare say you'd be more accurate to say that the Trump haters were delighted. I'm on the internet, I wasn't delighted. I don't care much about that type of leftist noise..
Click to expand...

Anthony, I can only marvel at your determination to not get a clear and simple point. Read this slowly and as many times as necessary. The article in the Guardian was about the fun people were having with the picture of Melania looking at trudeau. You’re arguing “its not a tweet” with no one in this thread. Again, its an article about the tweets. And your “its not the internet because I’m part of the internet” is hilarious. Its just another desperate (and dishonest) deflection from your “wah wah, they never did that President Obama” post. And you claimed to have "exposed" the difference. Your conservative masters did exactly what you are accusing the Guardian of doing. Simply click on the link and watch (and read) your conservative masters lying about president Obama’s photo

Following Free Republic, Drudge's lead, media run with Obama photo that doesn't show what they claim | Media Matters for America

Again, when your conservative masters actually did what you’re accusing the Guardian of, they were lying. The video clearly showed the picture of President Obama was out of context. No one is lying about the Melania photo. The guardian is simply reporting the hilarious tweets about it.
 
ludin said:
there is no point in talking to these people.
they have auto-deflect and auto-hypocrisy on.
Click to expand...

I think they have cobwebs in their little heads. Haven’t used their diminutive brains in a long while.


Sent from my iPhone XX Turbo using Tapacrap
 
Anthony60 said:
I think they have cobwebs in their little heads. Haven’t used their diminutive brains in a long while.


Sent from my iPhone XX Turbo using Tapacrap
Click to expand...

i clearly showed how obama had 3 years of trillion dollar deficits and the words were deficits don't matter.
there was no outrage at all over 3 years of trillion dollar deficits that obama and the liberals in congress ran up.

now all of a sudden we are supposed to be outraged? nope.

I am ticked off for other reasons mostly because having huge deficits is never good for a country.
it weakens our credibility to pay bills and pay on the debts that we have.

it also allows for massive spending increases instead of spending decreases and when i mean decrease i mean an actual decrease.
IE you don't have the same money has you had last year.
 
Vern said:
Anthony, I can only marvel at your determination to not get a clear and simple point. Read this slowly and as many times as necessary. The article in the Guardian was about the fun people were having with the picture of Melania looking at trudeau. You’re arguing “its not a tweet” with no one in this thread. Again, its an article about the tweets. And your “its not the internet because I’m part of the internet” is hilarious. Its just another desperate (and dishonest) deflection from your “wah wah, they never did that President Obama” post. And you claimed to have "exposed" the difference. Your conservative masters did exactly what you are accusing the Guardian of doing. Simply click on the link and watch (and read) your conservative masters lying about president Obama’s photo

Again, when your conservative masters actually did what you’re accusing the Guardian of, they were lying. The video clearly showed the picture of President Obama was out of context. No one is lying about the Melania photo. The guardian is simply reporting the hilarious tweets about it.
Click to expand...

LOL, Media Matters! No thanks. I don't need any malware and viruses on my computer, not to mention the leftist lies and garbage they spew.

And fine, you don't get it. In fact, you really can't get it, and still be a leftist. It's kind of required.

But, I find these "conservative masters" interesting. You refer to them a lot, and I don't even know who they are! Please, let me in on the secret. Are they like Dutch Masters or something? Masters and Johnson? Masters of the Universe?
 
ludin said:
i clearly showed how obama had 3 years of trillion dollar deficits and the words were deficits don't matter.
there was no outrage at all over 3 years of trillion dollar deficits that obama and the liberals in congress ran up.

now all of a sudden we are supposed to be outraged? nope.

I am ticked off for other reasons mostly because having huge deficits is never good for a country.
it weakens our credibility to pay bills and pay on the debts that we have.

it also allows for massive spending increases instead of spending decreases and when i mean decrease i mean an actual decrease.
IE you don't have the same money has you had last year.
Click to expand...

Yes, well, they are carefully dancing around the fact that they were all to happy with Obama's spending, but outraged over Trump's. It's like dealing with little kids.
See, as a conservative, I think they all over spent.

And the big danger with the spending in Bush's last year, to supposedly save the country, was that Obama might then keep that spending up and say he has barely increased the budget. It was supposed to be a one time fix, but we knew what Obama would do. And he did it, right on cue. And his dopey followers just went right along with it.

That's what I want to hear from the lefties, why did Obama continue that spending? We all know why, but the answers they dream up are just twisted BS.

And now, all their prospective candidates are proposing all kinds of spending that make our deficits now look like a joke. Healthcare, reparations, guaranteed income, etc... What to you think, maybe a $10 trillion dollar budget?

Oh, wait, what am I thinking? Just raise taxes, that will cover it all!
 
ludin said:
i clearly showed how obama had 3 years of trillion dollar deficits and the words were deficits don't matter.
there was no outrage at all over 3 years of trillion dollar deficits that obama and the liberals in congress ran up.
Click to expand...

You are quite correct, when Mr. Obama [D] was the President, the "Republicans" (whatever that means) were absolutely outraged over the deficits and the "Democrats" (whatever that means) thought that they were just peachy-keen.

Now that Mr. Trump [R] is the President, the "Democrats" (whatever that means) are absolutely outraged over the deficits and the "Republicans" (whatever that means) think that they were just peachy-keen.

As any fool can see, the two situations have absolutely nothing whatsoever in common with each other.

ludin said:
now all of a sudden we are supposed to be outraged? nope.
Click to expand...

Quite right, the "Republicans" (whatever that means) will NOT be "outraged" until __[fill in the blank__ [D] is occupying the office of President and the "Democrats" (whatever that means) will cease to be "outraged" at the same time. This will not happen until after the 2020 election, so it is NOT expected to happen "all of a sudden".

ludin said:
I am ticked off for other reasons mostly because having huge deficits is never good for a country.
Click to expand...

The average annual deficit in the US (1942-1946 inclusive) was 20.1%. The average annual deficit in the US (2009-2018 inclusive [2018 is estimate]) was 5.3%. The average annual deficit in the US (2012-2016 inclusive) was 3.95% (and falling from 2012 to 2016). The average annual deficit in the US (2017-2018 inclusive [2018 is estimate]) was 3.7% (and rising from 2017 to 2018).

"Huge deficits" didn't appear to to the US any harm during the 1942-1946 period.
it weakens our credibility to pay bills and pay on the debts that we have.

ludin said:
it also allows for massive spending increases instead of spending decreases
Click to expand...

What you have to remember is that those spending increases are all on things that -buy the sitting politicians more votes- benefit the American people.

ludin said:
and when i mean decrease i mean an actual decrease.
Click to expand...

Of come on now, everyone knows that lowing the rate of increase is the same thing as a decrease and lowering the rate of decrease is the same thing as an increase. Don't you pay ANY attention to politics?

ludin said:
IE you don't have the same money has you had last year.
Click to expand...

A dollar is a dollar is a dollar, so you still have the same money that you had previously. (At least that makes sense if you use "Climate Change Denial" logic.)
 
ludin said:
there is no point in talking to these people.
they have auto-deflect and auto-hypocrisy on.
Click to expand...

Anthony60 said:
I think they have cobwebs in their little heads. Haven’t used their diminutive brains in a long while.
Sent from my iPhone XX Turbo using Tapacrap
Click to expand...

You two guys are absolutely precious. there is simply no way to spin the way you both cowardly cut and run from the facts I’ve posted. And Anthony, you get double points because you are also a flaming hypocrite about it. You had quite the “pearl clutching” moment when I informed you that conservatives always cut and run when they start to realize their beliefs are false. Anyhoo, lets review

You posted “wah wah they never did this to President Obama”
I showed your conservative masters did exactly what you’re accusing the Guardian of

Sure, you obediently flailed with the devastating “nuh uh, that’s different”. But the facts won out and now we get the typical cutting and running as I predicted. Say that out loud: As I predicted. Seriously Anthony, help me understand why when it comes time for conservatives to choose narrative or integrity, you always choose narrative?
 
Anthony60 said:
LOL, Media Matters! No thanks. I don't need any malware and viruses on my computer, not to mention the leftist lies and garbage they spew.

And fine, you don't get it. In fact, you really can't get it, and still be a leftist. It's kind of required.
Click to expand...

I glad you could take some time out from your little “interlude” with Ludin but if that’s all you got you should get back to ludin. Anyhoo, I knew you would come up with excuses to not click the link. I've already told you that conservatives lack the integrity to admit they are wrong. again, I've proven your "wah wah, they never did that to President Obama" was false. And as predicted, you lack the integrity to admit it. In the future, you shouldn’t “clutch your pearls” when I'm right.

But, I find these "conservative masters" interesting. You refer to them a lot, and I don't even know who they are! Please, let me in on the secret. Are they like Dutch Masters or something? Masters and Johnson? Masters of the Universe?
Click to expand...
Oh that’s easy. They’re the people who told you that “President Obama was born in Kenya” “his BC a forgery” “he wants to kill old people” and the vile and disgusting “stand down” lies to name a few of their lies. What makes them your masters is that a large percentage if not majority of conservatives believe them even though they know they're lying. and you prove that point perfectly. You're afraid to click on a link that proves me right and you wrong. that's bad enough all by itself but you also know "the leftist lies and garbage they spew". er uh Anthony, how do you know what they do if you're afraid to click on the link? that's easy, that's what your conservative masters told you. You heard and obeyed. Now Anthony, if you ever find the integrity to click on the link, you'll see video and transcripts of your conservative masters doing exactly what you accuse the guardian of.
 
Last edited:
TU Curmudgeon said:
You are quite correct, when Mr. Obama [D] was the President, the "Republicans" (whatever that means) were absolutely outraged over the deficits and the "Democrats" (whatever that means) thought that they were just peachy-keen.
Click to expand...

Tu, democrats knew the massive trillion dollar Bush Deficits that President Obama inherited were baked in. We also knew if you tried to cut the Bush Deficits at that time, you would make the Great Bush Recession worse. Those deficits were baked in and the stimulus was necessary. You don't worry about deficits when GDP is -8 % and you're losing 600,000 jobs a month. And Republicans knew that too. But they also knew their ignorant base didn't know that. And we got 8 years of conservatives foaming at the mouth about deficits. Now they sit quietly while trump balloons it. His deficits are neither baked in nor necessary. There is simply no "equal but opposite" of that.

You seem to think that democrats are mad about trump ballooning the deficit. We are simply saying his deficits are unnecessary and we're pointing out that it proves what flaming lying hypocrites republicans are (and we're slipping in "we told you so"). Now even conservatives can no longer deny what flaming lying hypocrites republicans are. and that proves what flaming hypocrites they are. that's why ludin is clinging to lies. he lacks the integrity to admit the truth.
 
ludin said:
i clearly showed how obama had 3 years of trillion dollar deficits and the words were deficits don't matter.
there was no outrage at all over 3 years of trillion dollar deficits that obama and the liberals in congress ran up.

now all of a sudden we are supposed to be outraged? nope.

I am ticked off for other reasons mostly because having huge deficits is never good for a country.
it weakens our credibility to pay bills and pay on the debts that we have.

it also allows for massive spending increases instead of spending decreases and when i mean decrease i mean an actual decrease.
IE you don't have the same money has you had last year.
Click to expand...

LOL! Your literal lord and savior, twump, campaigned on getting rid of the debt and deficit.

Obama never did.

Your hypocrisy duly noted for the record.
 
Vern said:
You two guys are absolutely precious. there is simply no way to spin the way you both cowardly cut and run from the facts I’ve posted. And Anthony, you get double points because you are also a flaming hypocrite about it. You had quite the “pearl clutching” moment when I informed you that conservatives always cut and run when they start to realize their beliefs are false. Anyhoo, lets review

You posted “wah wah they never did this to President Obama”
I showed your conservative masters did exactly what you’re accusing the Guardian of

Sure, you obediently flailed with the devastating “nuh uh, that’s different”. But the facts won out and now we get the typical cutting and running as I predicted. Say that out loud: As I predicted. Seriously Anthony, help me understand why when it comes time for conservatives to choose narrative or integrity, you always choose narrative?
Click to expand...

You nailed it. Bravo.
 
TU Curmudgeon said:
From The Guardian

'Melania's ready to risk it all': first lady's Trudeau encounter delights internet
​

A photograph from the weekend G7 summit in France of Melania Trump greeting Canada’s prime minister, Justin Trudeau, has gone viral, with online commenters joking about the encounter.

A series of photographs, taken by a European Pressphoto Agency photographer as world leaders and their spouses came together on Sunday evening for a “family photo” to conclude the summit, show a smiling first lady greeting Trudeau.

The apparent warmth of the scene, not out of place in a diplomatic setting of its kind, nevertheless captured the imaginations of many.

COMMENT:-

The obvious love and affection shown between "Individual 1" and "Wife 3" should warm the cockles of the hearts of all true believers in the sanctity of marriage.
​
Click to expand...

Man, each edit gives you a bit more to work with.

First we have Melania with the apparent bedroom eyes for Justin, then they pull back and we see Trump making a so sad face, and finally we get a second, very similar shot that has the lady and the guy on either side of Trump reacting to the horny couple while cockolded Trump seems to pointedly stare in the opposite direction.

Who know what was really happening, but it certainly looks like silent movie era gold!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom