• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

FEC chair challenges Trump to provide evidence of voter fraud in New Hampshire

Jay Falcon

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 17, 2019
Messages
5,724
Reaction score
6,595
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
FEC chair challenges Trump to provide evidence of voter fraud in New Hampshire


The Democratic chairwoman of the Federal Election Commission on Friday challenged President Donald Trump to provide evidence of the voter fraud he insists cost him New Hampshire in 2016 or quit talking about it.

In a letter to Trump, Ellen Weintraub said the country's democracy depends on "the American people's faith in our elections. Your voter-fraud allegations run the risk of undermining that faith."

This is a challenge all Trump supporters should heed. Do you have some ridiculous conspiracy theory or claim? Offer evidence or keep it to themselves.
 
waste of time. just ignore Mango the Clown's lies.
 
Turn over he voter records so they can be verified if theres nothing to hide.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

We can start with that. Do you have any evidence that NH has not provided voting records?
 
This is a challenge all Trump supporters should heed. Do you have some ridiculous conspiracy theory or claim? Offer evidence or keep it to themselves.
...says the party that pushed a ridiculous Russia collusion conspiracy theory for two years. :lamo
 
Trump is a modern day Republican... He lied about this a couple of years ago when he said the Dems bused in 6,000 or so people to NH from Massachusetts. It was a lie then, it was proven to be a lie.. But did he learn? Does he care he just repeating the lie of a couple of years ago that was proven to be a lie?

No, because in today's Trump Republican Party lies don't matter, there is no consequences to lying..
 
Are we allowed to make up evidence, like, in a dossier or something?

The truth is, at least here in California we have no idea who is voting in elections. Absentee ballots are everywhere, many “accidentally” mailed to ineligible voters, then picked up by “vote harvesters”.

There is no ID required, no proof of citizenship, no address beyond a PO box, there is no chain of custody when absentee ballots are collected by vote harvesters in homeless camps. Challenges are ignored. You can also vote your absentee, and in person by saying you didn’t get your absentee ballot. There is no enforcement.

The vote corruption in California is such that in 2016 presidential vote totals were 14 million out of 30 million voters. Most people don’t even bother to vote anymore because they are too busy planning their exit.

The federal government tried to do an IG type inspection, but California refused to cooperate, and the effort was abandoned.
 
Trump is a modern day Republican... He lied about this a couple of years ago when he said the Dems bused in 6,000 or so people to NH from Massachusetts. It was a lie then, it was proven to be a lie.. But did he learn? Does he care he just repeating the lie of a couple of years ago that was proven to be a lie?

No, because in today's Trump Republican Party lies don't matter, there is no consequences to lying..
Do you have proof that the democrats did not bus anyone in? If so please provide it.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
Do you have proof that the democrats did not bus anyone in? If so please provide it.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

LOL... No, no that's not how it works.. This isn't Limbaugh's show or Fox News... You and your leader said there were people bused into NH.. YOU prove there was. Picture of the HUNDREDS of buses??? Everyone owns a camera nowadays... Should be easy for YOU to prove your claim..

I don't prove a negative.
 
waste of time. just ignore Mango the Clown's lies.
The problem is that he repeated the lie just the other day. Letting these lies go unchallenged makes some think they are not lies.
 
...says the party that pushed a ridiculous Russia collusion conspiracy theory for two years. :lamo
Now, I am going to call out YOUR lie. Your contention that the Trump campaign colluding with Russia is a conspiracy theory is the big lie. The Mueller report showed explicitly that there was no determination on “collusion” but there may have been at least some evidence pointing to possible conspiracy.

*“The investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired with the Russian government in its election interference activities,” Mueller said. But: “We did not address ‘collusion,’ which is not a legal term. Rather, we focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy. It was not.”
 
Last edited:
The problem is that he repeated the lie just the other day. Letting these lies go unchallenged makes some think they are not lies.

everyone who isn't in his zombie cult knows that he does little other than lie. those in the cult have their own reality which cannot be easily molded by the real one. it isn't worth the effort, IMO.
 
everyone who isn't in his zombie cult knows that he does little other than lie. those in the cult have their own reality which cannot be easily molded by the real one. it isn't worth the effort, IMO.
I'm just sensitive to the fact that #45 "won" narrowly, by getting razor thin margins in a few key states. If his lies take hold in what Lincoln called the people that 'you can fool some of the people some of the time,' he'll unduly get votes that calling out his lies may deny him.
 
...says the party that pushed a ridiculous Russia collusion conspiracy theory for two years. :lamo

Pushed a conspiracy theory? No, it was being investigated by the FBI. Not the same as a conspiracy theory. Not the same as standing up in front of a crowd and making ridiculous claims.
 
Do you have proof that the democrats did not bus anyone in? If so please provide it.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

More ridiculous claims. Negatives can't be proved.
 


This is a slightly more recent article


15 states are refusing to hand over voter data to Trump's panned election commission — here's how every state has responded



NEW HAMPSHIRE: Comply

As a result of a legal challenge regarding the information, New Hampshire is sending the commission millions of scanned and unsearchable images of voter information. Secretary of State Bill Gardner, a member of the commission, said his office will provide public information: names, addresses, party affiliations and voting history dating to 2006.
 
President of the United States of America Donald Trump's response to the challenge will probably be to tell him how many millions of murders and rapists his hundreds of miles of new walls have kept from coming into the country.

And so it goes.
 
President of the United States of America Donald Trump's response to the challenge will probably be to tell him how many millions of murders and rapists his hundreds of miles of new walls have kept from coming into the country.

And so it goes.

I don't know, Trump is very unpredictable with the lies he tells. He doesn't even know what lie he's going to tell next, so I doubt you can:)
 
Now, I am going to call out YOUR lie. Your contention that the Trump campaign colluding with Russia is a conspiracy theory is the big lie. The Mueller report showed explicitly that there was no determination on “collusion” but there may have been at least some evidence pointing to possible conspiracy.

*“The investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired with the Russian government in its election interference activities,” Mueller said. But: “We did not address ‘collusion,’ which is not a legal term. Rather, we focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy. It was not.”
You will note I explicitly used the "conspiracy" word in my comment because, of course, we've all heard the semantics game ad naseum.
 
Pushed a conspiracy theory? No, it was being investigated by the FBI. Not the same as a conspiracy theory. Not the same as standing up in front of a crowd and making ridiculous claims.
You don't qualify Trump working with Russians to steal an election as a "ridiculous claim"? :lamo

The whole thing was utterly idiotic, partisan bull****. A low point in American politics.
 
Back
Top Bottom