• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

FBI investigating shots fired at ICE offices in San Antonio

What'd I get wrong?

You don't need to get anything wrong in any thread you start or any post you write since you have been labeled a Trump supporter AKA a Trumpian or Trumpanze.

So it makes no difference what you actually write. You are in the same deplorable basket with Trump and are fair game for whatever is thrown at you.

So, until you dump Trump and accept ALL of those negative political talking points about Trump you will stay in the deplorable basket with Trump and all of his other supporters.

imho Roseann:)
 
All good questions. I'm not sure I understand you last question though... Care to expound?

Is it the responsibility of government, or someone/something else, to fix "broken" people? Basically, do we treat crime as a disease and those who commit crimes (criminals) as sick and provide them free care for life - essentially, offering a reward for failure?
 
And yet YOU couldn't say it and instead blamed everyone on the left BUT the shooter. Pathetic on your part.
And you'd NEVER do that when aimed at everyone on the right.....right?

Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk
 
idk, thinking that we can discuss a topic without throwing mud and watching it stick somewhere is too much to hope for. Perhaps also a topic for another discussion.
Yep, have a good night. See ya.
Hi, welcome to DP...That's literally all that happens in here anymore.

Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk
 
I only responded to the OP. Why? Did you leave something out of it?
You responded yes...was it constructive? No....never is....

Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk
 
I blame the gunman or gunwoman (which won't even pass spellcheck) or some other form of the various in vogue genders for the shooting.

The term is gunman. It's like congressman, policeman, mailman, etc. 'Man' is a part of the word, meaning person.
 
Wow, what ever happened to wait until we know the facts...... I guess that only applies when the shooter is an obvious RW lunatic...
Well when the shooter is suspected to be RW, liberals don't wait do they? Tell me how long before liberal hacks rushed to the airwaves to label the latest tragedies as being carried out by RW assailants? Only to get again emerge with eggs on their faces when the facts came out....spare us.

Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk
 
You don't need to get anything wrong in any thread you start or any post you write since you have been labeled a Trump supporter AKA a Trumpian or Trumpanze.

So it makes no difference what you actually write. You are in the same deplorable basket with Trump and are fair game for whatever is thrown at you.

So, until you dump Trump and accept ALL of those negative political talking points about Trump you will stay in the deplorable basket with Trump and all of his other supporters.

imho Roseann:)
Yeah, that's not intolerant....:roll:

Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk
 
And you'd NEVER do that when aimed at everyone on the right.....right?

Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk

I didn’t blame trump for the shootings at all. Maybe some cons should grow up. Right? Also take your whataboutism the hell out of here. How does that excuse blaming the left?
 
It appears that at least one person has taken seriously the Second Amendment interpretation that gun ownership is, among other things, a defense against the federal government. Unfortunately, that same Amendment does not speak to the specific offenses that the government is enjoined from committing. The interpretation is left up to the citizen. That maps nicely onto the 'high crimes and misdemeanors' clause in the same document. In that instance, the interpretation is left up to the political party in control of the Senate of the United States of America.

And so it goes in the home of the brave and the land of the free.
 
What the hell is a gunwoman, is that a gunman who had a sex change/


No No NO websters does not cover this at all!!!!!!!!one

Shame shame. It should be gunperson. This covers male, female, trans, and everything else the left want to use for PC.
 
Didn't read the entire thread yet, did you?

The premise of the thread is how these fringe lunatics become crazy and who is influencing them to kill. It goes without saying that I will always hold killers, attempted killers responsible for their crimes. I'm a conservative who believes in self-responsibility at all times.
I mentioned the above because I am wondering what motivates these people to want to kill. I do believe extreme rhetoric coming from fringe pro-illegal immigrant OPEN border groups, leftist media who sensationalizes and exploits migrant children's tearful faces, open border leftist politicians pandering for the Hispanic vote are complicit influences.

Complicit, but not responsible, yes. You think this differs from the liberal position... how?
 
Shame shame. It should be gunperson. This covers male, female, trans, and everything else the left want to use for PC.

If we are using the Batman model this would be a person who dresses like a gun?
 
You need to read the entire thread for context but you won't.
You'll be back within 5 mins. with more pearls.

Why?
You are the OP, there was no thread context to read until after you posted your thoughts.
Wacked out weak sauce.
 
Is it the responsibility of government, or someone/something else, to fix "broken" people? Basically, do we treat crime as a disease and those who commit crimes (criminals) as sick and provide them free care for life - essentially, offering a reward for failure?

We shouldn't and no it is not the responsibility of gov. to fix "broken people".
I hope I didn't give the impression that I thought it was gov.'s responsibility.
 
Last edited:
I blame the gunman or gunwoman (which won't even pass spellcheck) or some other form of the various in vogue genders for the shooting.

Well, If people are gonna blame Trump for the mass shootings, I guess, what's good for the goose....
 
FBI investigating shots fired at ICE offices in San Antonio



Since the shooting, I've read they have arrested and taken a suspect into custody.

I blame leftist pandering politicians, leftist media outlets, open border extremists,and pro-illegal activist groups for misinforming the public, and making ICE agents out to be public enemy number one.

Is this where we hope that this is the Reichstag Fire that you people have been longing for? Cause that'd be about at the level of your OP, trix. That'd be about square.
 
We shouldn't and no it is not the responsibility of gov. to fix "broken people".
I hope I didn't give the impression that I thought it was gov.'s responsibility.

OK, then who's responsibility is it?
 
Back
Top Bottom