• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump Used Asian Accent to Mock US Allies at Fundraiser

Oborosen said:
Possibly, however I don't think it really requires Trump to do anything. If he's not counterpunching, then he's just normally saying things that anyone could easily agree with.

Yet you have people on the left who continually call him a white supremacist, no matter what he says, or does. People who call for either violence, or harassment targeted towards him, or his supporters, and even people who say some extremely inflammatory things to spur people on. Like that reporter who said he wanted to exterminate all Latinos, and only managed to correct herself after a few days. But at that point the lie had already been repeated several hundred thousand times.
Click to expand...

Yes, they call him a racist because of his dehumanizing comments on twitter and to the press and his racist history. He's anything but normal. The Emperor has no clothes and what has been seen cannot be unseen.

Look, I don't know what to tell you except neither side has control over what individuals in their party say or do. All we have is control over is ourselves.
 
Last edited:
Oborosen said:
Ah yes, the women's march.
Which turned out to be lead by a hotbed of anti-Semitism, and sexism... good feels that one.
Click to expand...

Geez, talk about spreading. You blame millions for the words of one or two speakers and you wonder why the left says things about the right? You might wanna pull the log out of your own eye before trying to pull the splinter out of mine.
 
Moot said:
Yes, they call him a racist because of his dehumanizing comments on twitter and to the press and his racist history. He's anything but normal. The Emperor has no clothes and what has been seen cannot be unseen.

Look, I don't know what to tell you except neither side has control over what individuals in their party say or do. All we have is control over is ourselves.
Click to expand...

He could come out and say he likes to brush his teeth, and they'd still call him a racist. Just calling him a racist doesn't actually prove that he is one. It only makes the accuser look like a ass.

I agree with you on that one.
 
Moot said:
Geez, talk about spreading. You blame millions for the words of one or two speakers and you wonder why the left says things about the right? You might wanna pull the log out of your own eye before trying to pull the splinter out of mine.
Click to expand...

That was the exact same point I was making.
 
Moot said:
Good grief, if anyone wants to dismantle the US Constitution it's your boy, Trump. He acts like he's never even read it, let alone understands it.
Click to expand...

Most of the libs on this board act like they never read, so give me a break.
 
Oborosen said:
The assaults across multiple cities, the riots after Trump was elected, the threatening of public figures with violence..etc.
Click to expand...

Which obviously started in 2016, and there's certainly no history of right wing violence in America, right?
 
WCH said:
Trying to provide you with a contrast. Personally I like Trump's approach much better than Obama's limp wristed one.

I'm sick of holding the world's hand.
Click to expand...

Sounds like whatever hand you're holding is attached to the end of a limp wrist.
 
WCH said:
You're about as naïve as they come.

Good thing Hillary didn't win...we'd be at war with Russia.
Click to expand...

The US might be able to win a trade war with Russia.

The odds on a real "shooting" war with Russia are roughly on a par with you being unanimously acclaimed "God-King of the Universe" AND THEN abdicating in my favour.

PS - You do know that BOTH the US and Russia have enough nuclear weapons to make it rather stupid for either of them to start a real "shooting" war with the other - don't you?
 
TU Curmudgeon said:
The US might be able to win a trade war with Russia.

The odds on a real "shooting" war with Russia are roughly on a par with you being unanimously acclaimed "God-King of the Universe" AND THEN abdicating in my favour.

PS - You do know that BOTH the US and Russia have enough nuclear weapons to make it rather stupid for either of them to start a real "shooting" war with the other - don't you?
Click to expand...

So do China, France, Israel, GB, Pakistan, India, and NK. All that has to happen is for someone to blink.

Proxy wars seem to be in fashion these days.
 
WCH said:
Trying to provide you with a contrast. Personally I like Trump's approach much better than Obama's limp wristed one.

I'm sick of holding the world's hand.
Click to expand...

Get over yourself, dude.
 
Jredbaron96 said:
Which obviously started in 2016, and there's certainly no history of right wing violence in America, right?
Click to expand...

Right and left wing violence has been prevalent in the country for a long time. The earliest reports I've seen of Antifa have been from around 2011, and it's possible that they've been around since well before that.

Then again, you'd have to make the distinction of left and right, when it comes to these sort of acts of violence. Because I've seen terrorist actions linked to the right when the only governmental belief attributed to the attacker was that they were an anarchist. Which right now, would be Antifa itself at this very moment, and one would be pretty blind to believe that they were on the right with how the promote themselves.
 
Oborosen said:
Right and left wing violence has been prevalent in the country for a long time. The earliest reports I've seen of Antifa have been from around 2011, and it's possible that they've been around since well before that.

Then again, you'd have to make the distinction of left and right, when it comes to these sort of acts of violence. Because I've seen terrorist actions linked to the right when the only governmental belief attributed to the attacker was that they were an anarchist. Which right now, would be Antifa itself at this very moment, and one would be pretty blind to believe that they were on the right with how the promote themselves.
Click to expand...

:roll:

Of course they did.
 
Oborosen said:
Is your dismissal supposed to mean something pertinent, or are you bowing out of the conversation like all the rest?
Click to expand...

Your dogged insistence that the Left is the only side accountable for acts of violence speaks for itself.
 
Oborosen said:
Is your dismissal supposed to mean something pertinent, or are you bowing out of the conversation like all the rest?
Click to expand...

I see the limp to your posts is back again.

As usual, I hope it gets better soon. Maybe you should seek some new treatments.

I'll simply reiterate what I started saying early in 2017, which that if Trump needs to be shown the WH Gate it will be due to reasons of national security, national defense, national sovereignty. I've added since then that post election violence in 2020 by 21st century uniquely American fascists who reject the outcome would be right up there too as the basis of a removal.

So let's hope that limp doesn't become even worse eh.
 
WCH said:
So do China, France, Israel, GB, Pakistan, India, and NK. All that has to happen is for someone to blink.

Proxy wars seem to be in fashion these days.
Click to expand...

You are NOT ALLOWED to accuse the peaceful and democratic republic of Israel of having nuclear weapons. Accusing the peaceful and democratic republic of Israel of having nuclear weapons implies that having nuclear weapons is somehow "wrong". Accusing the peaceful and democratic republic of Israel of doing something "wrong" is just plain old antisemitism (especially when you have no actual proof of what you are accusing the peaceful and democratic republic of Israel of doing).

[The above officially approved and endorsed by "Devoted Online Lovers of Trump" Inc. (a non-partisan, independent, research and analysis organization exempt from federal taxation that is dedicated to bringing you the true truth and not the false truth that anyone who doesn't believe 100% of what Donald Trump says tries to tell you the so-called "facts" are), "Pro-Life United Gun Enthusiasts and Manufacturers for Jesus", and “The ‘First Amendment Rights Trust’ Foundation”.]
 
TU Curmudgeon said:
You are NOT ALLOWED to accuse the peaceful and democratic republic of Israel of having nuclear weapons. Accusing the peaceful and democratic republic of Israel of having nuclear weapons implies that having nuclear weapons is somehow "wrong". Accusing the peaceful and democratic republic of Israel of doing something "wrong" is just plain old antisemitism (especially when you have no actual proof of what you are accusing the peaceful and democratic republic of Israel of doing).

[The above officially approved and endorsed by "Devoted Online Lovers of Trump" Inc. (a non-partisan, independent, research and analysis organization exempt from federal taxation that is dedicated to bringing you the true truth and not the false truth that anyone who doesn't believe 100% of what Donald Trump says tries to tell you the so-called "facts" are), "Pro-Life United Gun Enthusiasts and Manufacturers for Jesus", and “The ‘First Amendment Rights Trust’ Foundation”.]
Click to expand...

You know any good lawyers?

I certainly don't see any. Not presently.

I did talk to one a while ago though and she said the Salt treaties remain in force and its looks like that will continue for a good time yet. The treaties need an updating we shouldn't be optimistic about I'm afraid. Yet we do have the Salt still on the table.

Proxy wars are going out of style btw in favor of direct state to state incidents between the great powers. Y'know, Russia shoots a B-1 or whatever out of the sky then gives the US the finger. China damages an aircraft carrier and throws a huge party in Beijing. Then USA replies by taking out a bridge or an artificial island or whatever. Then everyone grabs the hot lines and starts talking very fast to meet.
 
Jredbaron96 said:
Your dogged insistence that the Left is the only side accountable for acts of violence speaks for itself.
Click to expand...

I made no such claim, now did I?
Because I've already pointed out before that both the left & right have their detractors, and when someone who does such horrible things on the right comes out. They are condemned by not only the left, but the right as almost a complete whole.

Yet we've seen that the left has far less of an issue with either supporting, or endorsing those that do violence in service to their agenda.
 
Tangmo said:
I see the limp to your posts is back again.

As usual, I hope it gets better soon. Maybe you should seek some new treatments.

I'll simply reiterate what I started saying early in 2017, which that if Trump needs to be shown the WH Gate it will be due to reasons of national security, national defense, national sovereignty. I've added since then that post election violence in 2020 by 21st century uniquely American fascists who reject the outcome would be right up there too as the basis of a removal.

So let's hope that limp doesn't become even worse eh.
Click to expand...

If throwing lite insults is all you have, then you still don't have much to work with.

Though I will keep in mind that you still can only run from the conversation, and not actually address any aspect of it. Seeing as the last time we actually saw violence erupt from an election, the likes of which we had in 2016. It was from your side.

The rioting, the physical assault cases, arsons, and general havoc the lot of you perpetrated. Was proof enough that at least some of you, can't handle anything not going the way that you demand it to.

I would try to state that the same could be the same for the right leaning side as well. Though we had two elected terms for Obama with nothing like what the left did, and he even won by the same rules.

So given the evidence, if Trump is voted out of office, then he'll go. He might bitch and moan about it, seeing as that is a part of his character. But he'll go nonetheless.
Though if he's voted in for a second term. I'm somewhat worried as to what kind of BS your side will pull to try and force things into their own view.
 
What President of the United States of America Donald Trump says at one of his rallies tells us more about his followers in the audience than it does about him. We have no reason, a priori, to assume that he believes what he says. We do have reason, based upon the reaction of his loyal followers, to conclude that they approve of what he says.

Before we go our merry way,
Until we wander on,
Let's pause to praise our leader brave.
Let's hear it for the Don!

Stout heart has he; a man of steel,
He does our nation proud.
It's time we made our feelings known.
That's right! Shout 'MAGA' loud!

[Poem by A. C. Rostic]
 
Tangmo said:
You know any good lawyers?

I certainly don't see any. Not presently.
Click to expand...

That would most certainly depend on your definition of "good" - wouldn't it?

Tangmo said:
I did talk to one a while ago though and she said the Salt treaties remain in force ...
Click to expand...

So far Mr. Trump has not exercised his royal prerogative and repudiated the SALTs.

Tangmo said:
... and its looks like that will continue for a good time yet.
Click to expand...

That would most certainly depend on your definition of "good" - wouldn't it?

Tangmo said:
The treaties need an updating we shouldn't be optimistic about I'm afraid.
Click to expand...

The odds that any country will take an offer to "negotiate new terms" seriously when that offer comes from the White House are currently incredibly how.

Tangmo said:
Yet we do have the Salt still on the table.
Click to expand...

Which is where it is going to remain until Mr. Trump decides that it is "contrary to the national security interests of the United States of America" (to allow any other country to possess nuclear arms [or the capacity to produce nuclear arms {or the theoretical ability to produce the capacity to produce nuclear arms <or the educational/financial resources that could possibly be used to produce the theoretical ability to produce the capacity to produce nuclear arms - or anyone who is literate above the "See Spot. See Spot run. Run Spot, run." level ->}]).

Tangmo said:
Proxy wars are going out of style btw in favor of direct state to state incidents between the great powers. Y'know, ...
Click to expand...

No I didn't know that.

Tangmo said:
... Russia shoots a B-1 or whatever out of the sky then gives the US the finger.
Click to expand...

Really?!?!?!? When did that happen?

Tangmo said:
China damages an aircraft carrier and throws a huge party in Beijing.
Click to expand...

Really?!?!?!? When did that happen?

Tangmo said:
Then USA replies by taking out a bridge or an artificial island or whatever.
Click to expand...

Really?!?!?!? When did that happen?

Tangmo said:
Then everyone grabs the hot lines and starts talking very fast to meet.
Click to expand...

Really?!?!?!? When did that happen?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom