- Joined
- Nov 28, 2014
- Messages
- 58,827
- Reaction score
- 17,437
I blame gun free zones since the majority of, if not all of them occur there. Lets outlaw these killing zones.Time to sue over this. If they are going to ban firearms, then the business/mall has an absolute duty to have armed, trained security - and sufficiently - since they knowingly and deliberately advertise they have made everyone defenseless against a shooter or other type of assailants.
This answers my question of why there were not CCWers or open carriers to at least provide covering and distracting cover fire. The fault is NOT the 2Aers, but the anti-gun crowd.
Ironically, if you read his manifesto who he most hates is corporations that he sees as victimizing everyone in many ways - including the environment itself - and wrote he would ONLY pick a "soft target," not any place with armed security. So he was right, the anti-gun stance of the corporation of the mail did just victimize many people and he was correct in his analysis of that corporation and the benefit of attacking where he knew there was no one armed to oppose him.
This is Texas - CCW and Open Carry. He relied - accurately - on the Mall corporation advertising he can shoot defenseless people - and on the anti gun-rights attitude leading to it.
Do not blame the gun. Blame the lack of guns by anti-gunners and an anti-gun corporation. They just got about 60 people shot.
Its funny too i did not even know snything about this shooting when i commented on it. I just assumed it was a gun free zone.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk