• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Iran claims to have seized British oil tanker in strait of Hormuz

Iran made the decision to commit these acts.

That's as idiotic as saying that FDR caused WW2, because he placed an embargo on Japan.

I've read the original seed of Japan declaring war on us was when we snubbed them during the post-WWI negotiations, and they saw there would never be a place for them amongst the major nations unless they compelled it.

So pretty parallel, yeah.
 
I'd hate to break it to you, but the Pakistani's have been supplying the Taliban for years and regularly acting against us. I don't know where you're coming from where you think we can just tell Pakistan to "jump" and they'll ask "How high?"

Play our cards wrong and Islamabad and the ISI is going to tell us to get ****ed.



Which they could easily get from the Chinese or the Russians.

Pakistan is far closer to China than Russia. Its relationship with China is more important than its relationship with the US.

Russia has traditionally been closer to India than Pakistan, but has opened up to Pakistan recently.

The US has ignored Pakistan's strategic interests regarding Afghanistan (depth vs India) in the same way as the US is ignoring Turkey's strategic interests (Kurds) as such is losing them both as allies/friends
 
I'd hate to break it to you, but the Pakistani's have been supplying the Taliban for years and regularly acting against us. I don't know where you're coming from where you think we can just tell Pakistan to "jump" and they'll ask "How high?"

Play our cards wrong and Islamabad and the ISI is going to tell us to get ****ed.



Which they could easily get from the Chinese or the Russians.

Big difference between that, and sending her armed forces head-to-head with the U.S.
 
I've read the original seed of Japan declaring war on us was when we snubbed them during the post-WWI negotiations, and they saw there would never be a place for them amongst the major nations unless they compelled it.

So pretty parallel, yeah.

Just wow! :lamo
 
Big difference between that, and sending her armed forces head-to-head with the U.S.

Pakistan doesn't have to fight us at all. They just have to say "You can't fly over our airspace or transit through our land" and American forces in Afghanistan are screwed out of their chief supply line. They're a sovereign nation and they can do that if they want to.
 
How many times?

There was operation Ajax, the 1953 coup d'etat of the Democratically elected prime minister Mohammad Mosaddegh and strengthened the monarchial power Of Shah Reza Pahlavi, who the Iranian people remember to this day as a tyrant.

We also supported that tyrant’s reign for 25 years, before the Iranian people overthrew the tyrannical regime.

Oh and we also supplied logistical support to Iraq during the Iran-Iraq war.

So maybe the Iranians might have a few good reasons to not trust us.
 
Having spent multiple years in the ME since 9/11 I really don't have a lot of interest in the US getting involved in a new war there. But for Iran I will make an exception. I have a couple of teammates that never came home from Iraq due to to Iran's EFPs. I will happily return the favor for some Iranians.
 
Having spent multiple years in the ME since 9/11 I really don't have a lot of interest in the US getting involved in a new war there. But for Iran I will make an exception. I have a couple of teammates that never came home from Iraq due to to Iran's EFPs. I will happily return the favor for some Iranians.

Yee haw! You'll probably be home by Christmas; where has that been uttered before?
 
There was operation Ajax, the 1953 coup d'etat of the Democratically elected prime minister Mohammad Mosaddegh and strengthened the monarchial power Of Shah Reza Pahlavi, who the Iranian people remember to this day as a tyrant.

We also supported that tyrant’s reign for 25 years, before the Iranian people overthrew the tyrannical regime.

Oh and we also supplied logistical support to Iraq during the Iran-Iraq war.

So maybe the Iranians might have a few good reasons to not trust us.

So, once and that was a British operation.

Y'all sure do bend over backwards to try and blame everything on the U.S. :lamo
 
Yee haw! You'll probably be home by Christmas; where has that been uttered before?

Who said that. Oh that's right. No one. Do you enjoy simply making up things to rant against. What a minute I don't know why I bother to ask as you obviously do.

Fortunately most people don't instantly resort to such dishonest nonsense
 
Last edited:
So, once and that was a British operation.

Y'all sure do bend over backwards to try and blame everything on the U.S. :lamo

You're being (I hope willfully) obtuse. That overthrow would never have occurred without the U.S.'s approval and we were actively involved.

Iran's history since that time is a direct result.
 
So, once and that was a British operation.

Y'all sure do bend over backwards to try and blame everything on the U.S. :lamo

And Mohammad Mosaddegh trusted the United States and thought that the United States could force Britain to back down.

The 1953 coup permanently ruined our reputation in the Middle East.
 

So you are expecting people on this forum to be responsible for any thing that has been stated in recorded history. How about we actually deal with what posts actually say.

oh I get that's a problem as it would force you to be a bit more honest.
Here is a clue for you I am not responsible for things other people say.
 
So you are expecting g people on this forum to responsible for any thing that has been started in recorded history. Hope aboyt we actually deal with what posts actually say.

oh I get that's a problem as it would force you to be a bit more honest.
Here is a clue for you I am not responsible for things other people say.

Sorry, I can’t connect the dots for you.....hope you get what you need.
 
And Mohammad Mosaddegh trusted the United States and thought that the United States could force Britain to back down.

The 1953 coup permanently ruined our reputation in the Middle East.

They hated us, anyway. There's no way we could ally ourselves with Israel and still be loved in the ME. That just wasn't going to happen. It's time you all accept that reality.
 
You're being (I hope willfully) obtuse. That overthrow would never have occurred without the U.S.'s approval and we were actively involved.

Iran's history since that time is a direct result.

Perhaps, but when you people bring up Operation Ajax, you lay all the blame on The United States. You ignore, even deny the fact that it was concocted by the Brits.

Now, you're blaming us for the mullahs. :lamo
 
Perhaps, but when you people bring up Operation Ajax, you lay all the blame on The United States. You ignore, even deny the fact that it was concocted by the Brits.

Now, you're blaming us for the mullahs. :lamo

That doesn't excuse the U.S.'s actions. (Where have I seen that line recently?)

Were they not overthrowing a government forced upon them by the West? That their uprising coalesced around religious radicals is incidental. An uprising was inevitable the very second we interfered.
 
That doesn't excuse the U.S.'s actions. (Where have I seen that line recently?)

Were they not overthrowing a government forced upon them by the West? That their uprising coalesced around religious radicals is incidental. An uprising was inevitable the very second we interfered.

What about England's actions?
 
What about England's actions?

They own their piece, too. We certainly learned the wrong lessons from those crumpet munchers.
 
Sorry, I can’t connect the dots for you.....hope you get what you need.

So you have nothing. you could have just described that from the beginning. It would have saved you some embarrassment
 
I don’t think Trump is going to be sending them any pallets of cash.

He is notorious for not honoring debts, so that's not surprising.
 
Back
Top Bottom