• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

House Condemns Trump’s Attack on Four Congresswomen as Racist

No, the media assigned the names that would fit their agenda.
He never denied who he was referring and doubled down with "When will the Radical Left Congresswomen apologize to our Country, the people of Israel and even to the Office of the President, for the foul language they have used, and the terrible things they have said. So many people are angry at them & their horrible & disgusting actions!"
- Jul 15, 2019

Don't ask me why he randomly capitalizes words.
 
Last edited:
Just because you believe anyone who doesnt strictly adhere to political correctness is a practicioner of "assholery" doesnt mean the rest of us do.

Of course you do. And you celebrate it.

All political correctness is is showing respect, and avoiding offensive language, not by your own standards, but by the standards of the people or person your words are directed at or are about. That's it. That's all. That's what you're railing against. You're essentially just the guy that refuses to hold his flatulence in the elevator. Good for you.
 
Of course you do. And you celebrate it.

All political correctness is is showing respect, and avoiding offensive language, not by your own standards, but by the standards of the people or person your words are directed at or are about.

I dont think anyone has to adopt the standards of the oh so delicate snowflakes of today. For instance 30% of Democrats view any criticism of a colored politician by a white person as racist. I say **** them. We will continue to criticize politicians regardless of their color.
 
No, the media assigned the names that would fit their agenda.

D_1rtwIXoAAyXq5.jpg:large
 
I dont think anyone has to adopt the standards of the oh so delicate snowflakes of today.

But you have elected a giant snowflake as your POTUS, I've literally never seen a bigger snowflake than Trump. And obviously he represents your values, or you wouldn't support him.

For instance 30% of Democrats view any criticism of a colored politician by a white person as racist.

:lamo And there we have the basis of your arguments: Imaginary nonsense.
 

Perhaps you were unaware that we have copies of the tweets in question. We can see for a fact that he named no one.

So interesting to see “Progressive” Democrat Congresswomen, who originally came from countries whose governments are a complete and total catastrophe, the worst, most corrupt and inept anywhere in the world (if they even have a functioning government at all), now loudly......
....and viciously telling the people of the United States, the greatest and most powerful Nation on earth, how our government is to be run. Why don’t they go back and help fix the totally broken and crime infested places from which they came. Then come back and show us how....
....it is done. These places need your help badly, you can’t leave fast enough. I’m sure that Nancy Pelosi would be very happy to quickly work out free travel arrangements!
 
Perhaps you were unaware that we have copies of the tweets in question. We can see for a fact that he named no one.

So interesting to see “Progressive” Democrat Congresswomen, who originally came from countries whose governments are a complete and total catastrophe, the worst, most corrupt and inept anywhere in the world (if they even have a functioning government at all), now loudly......
....and viciously telling the people of the United States, the greatest and most powerful Nation on earth, how our government is to be run. Why don’t they go back and help fix the totally broken and crime infested places from which they came. Then come back and show us how....
....it is done. These places need your help badly, you can’t leave fast enough. I’m sure that Nancy Pelosi would be very happy to quickly work out free travel arrangements!

Well this lying buffoon who spends time in Washington DC considers himself a genius and likes to brag about all the great things that he has done! Note that I didn't name who.

For the win, you get one guess. Identify the lying buffoon.
 
I dont think anyone has to adopt the standards of the oh so delicate snowflakes of today. For instance 30% of Democrats view any criticism of a colored politician by a white person as racist. I say **** them. We will continue to criticize politicians regardless of their color.

No, of course no one has to adopt anything... :shrug: Just like there's no law against farting in an elevator. We all choose how we wish to be viewed.

Out of curiosity, why do you hate politeness so much? Do you feel equally pissed about having to say please and thank you?
 
Well this lying buffoon who spends time in Washington DC considers himself a genius and likes to brag about all the great things that he has done! Note that I didn't name who.
.

Yeah, you instead mocked the pictured Trump supporters saying "he didn't say that" when we in fact have a record of the tweets and can all but you see that in fact, HE DID NOT SAY THAT. The media created the racism that didnt exist AND provided ALL the names of the congresswomen
 
Out of curiosity, why do you hate politeness so much?

I hate your version of politeness that views any criticism of a colored politician by a white person as impolite racism. Besides Trumps lack of "politeness" pales in comparison to theirs.
 
I hate your version of politeness that views any criticism of a colored politician by a white person as impolite racism. Besides Trumps lack of "politeness" pales in comparison to theirs.

It's not my version. I would suggest when manners reach the level of being political, it's society's version.

Anyway...you didn't say why, you just said you hated it again. Why do you hate it so much? Maybe try to leave out the nonsensical exaggeration, or back up your broad brush statements with links to prove your wild assertions.
 
I dont think anyone has to adopt the standards of the oh so delicate snowflakes of today. For instance 30% of Democrats view any criticism of a colored politician by a white person as racist. I say **** them. We will continue to criticize politicians regardless of their color.
Is that what Trump is doing? Criticizing people regardless of their color? Why hasn't be told Pelosi to go back to Ireland or Italy? Why hasn't he told Schumer to go back to Israel and fix their crime and terrorism problems? These were women were selected.



Sent from the Oval Office using Putin's MacBook, and Barr's Wi-Fi password.
 
:roll: You assume they were among the Neo-Nazis. You create imaginary truths to facilitate your narrative.

Are you ****ing kidding? Talk about projection.

uniteright.jpg

I think you prove my point about right wing denial. Do you think this is the only picture of these clowns and others? No, they are PART of the right and they were there that day for all to see. If you can't admit that, you're a big part of the problem. How you or Trump could still maintain that good people chose to march with these idiots is evidence of your utter lack of credibility on this.
 
Are you ****ing kidding? Talk about projection.

Showing pictures of the Neo-Nazis at the rally doesn't erase the fact that TWICE in that presser Trump condemned the Neo-Nazis who were at the rally, proving tat Trump did not call them very fine people.

In fact, he quote clearly said that the Historical Preservation people who were their to protest the removal of the monument were who he was talking about.

But you keep beating that dead horse.
 
In fact, [Trump] clearly said.
No we know you're just kidding around. Trump never speaks clearly, and -when he does accidentally, he will **** it up in the next few seconds or next tweet or next press conference.

Come on jmotivator. You do know what talking about an issue sufficient to get the message across,without being explicit is? No one could be that stupid. are you stupid>? My brother who says things identical to you, is confirmed stupid. Did I mean you are stupid? Surely not, I clearly didn't say it. What did Lee Atwater...Republicans strategist tell you about that?

Atwater: Y'all don't quote me on this. You start out in 1954 by saying, "Nigger, nigger, nigger." By 1968 you can't say "nigger" — that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now [that] you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me — because obviously sitting around saying, "We want to cut this," is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than "Nigger, nigger."
You know him and Manafort and Stone all worked together....three giants, bettering America one election at a time.
 
Yeah, you instead mocked the pictured Trump supporters saying "he didn't say that" when we in fact have a record of the tweets and can all but you see that in fact, HE DID NOT SAY THAT. The media created the racism that didnt exist AND provided ALL the names of the congresswomen

SMH. Please provide the quote of me mocking 'the pictured Trump supporters'.

Have you absorbed any of the comments or actions made by either of the two Black GOP Congressmen?

Senator Tim Scott (SC) called Trump's tweets 'racially offensive'. Rep. Will Hurd (Dist. 12 TX) voted to condemn Trump.
 

Again, that is made up nonsense. I would suggest that you start using more reputable sources, or at least ones that don't use lies as clickbait.

Follow the links, and see what the poll actually related to. Hint: It isn't the clickbait title.


EDIT: Rasmussen doesn't look like a good source period, do you pulled of a double fail:
The study ranked Rasmussen Reports 24th out of 28 polls in accuracy, one slot above Gallup. An analysis by Nate Silver on FiveThirtyEight ranked Rasmussen 20th out of 23 pollsters for accuracy in the 2012 elections with an average error of 4.2 points.
Founder: Scott Rasmussen
Products: Opinion polling, news
Rasmussen Reports - Wikipedia
 
Last edited:
Showing pictures of the Neo-Nazis at the rally doesn't erase the fact that TWICE in that presser Trump condemned the Neo-Nazis who were at the rally, proving tat Trump did not call them very fine people.

In fact, he quote clearly said that the Historical Preservation people who were their to protest the removal of the monument were who he was talking about.

But you keep beating that dead horse.

To hell with Trump. You implied that the "good" people at the rally could have somehow missed the fact that they were marching with NAZIs. Do you still hold that position? If so, you're delusional.
 
It's not my version. I would suggest when manners reach the level of being political, it's society's version.

Anyway...you didn't say why, you just said you hated it again. Why do you hate it so much?

AGAIN it views any criticism of a colored politician by a white person as impolite racism.
 
Again, that is made up nonsense. I would suggest that you start using more reputable sources, or at least ones that don't use lies as clickbait.

Follow the links, and see what the poll actually related to. Hint: It isn't the clickbait title.


EDIT: Rasmussen doesn't look like a good source period, do you pulled of a double fail:
The study ranked Rasmussen Reports 24th out of 28 polls in accuracy, one slot above Gallup. An analysis by Nate Silver on FiveThirtyEight ranked Rasmussen 20th out of 23 pollsters for accuracy in the 2012 elections with an average error of 4.2 points.
Founder: Scott Rasmussen
Products: Opinion polling, news
Rasmussen Reports - Wikipedia

1/3rd of those polled believing so is backed up by 70% of the media believing it is so.
 
AGAIN it views any criticism of a colored politician by a white person as impolite racism.

No it doesn't, that's just dumb. I mean, if the "criticism" is calling them a racial slur, or telling them to go back to where they came from, well, then, hell yeah, it's racist, and those people should quietly and quickly STFU. But while what you've said would certainly be problematic, and is a spicy point to make on a debate forum, it simply isn't true. Everyone knows only the Israeli government enjoys that kind of privileged victimhood.
 

The closest thing to evidence against the claim presented in Sommer's piece is a reference to a time Omar showed a Star Tribune reporter pictures on her cell phone of immigration documents with a list of members of her family. Sommer's piece fails to mention that Omar declined to provide copies of any of the documents to the reporter or allow him to make record of the information he was briefly allowed to view.


Can't say I blame her for not showing documentation When Obama showed his birth certificate, it was called a fake, and ignored by Trump and his merry band of racists, and the smears continued.

Why would it be any different if Omar showed her documentation? This is obviously another racist attack, like the Birther Movement, so the people who are smearing her will continue smearing her no matter what documentation she shows.
 
Showing pictures of the Neo-Nazis at the rally doesn't erase the fact that TWICE in that presser Trump condemned the Neo-Nazis who were at the rally, proving tat Trump did not call them very fine people.

In fact, he quote clearly said that the Historical Preservation people who were their to protest the removal of the monument were who he was talking about.

But you keep beating that dead horse.

Yep. Trump wasn't talking about the Neo Nazis or KKK members

He was talking about the people who came to march at a rally hosted by White Supremacists. Ooh, that doesn't looks so good eh? Well, so what, right?

The stated purpose of the rally was to...let's see....Unite White Supremacists from across he country. Er, sure, but maybe people showed up and didn't know! How would anyone know that it's White Supremacist rally?

Look, here are some pics of the rally. Now you tell me, when very fine people show up, how could they possibly tell this was a White Supremacist rally that they should avoid? What are they, mind readers?

09Daily-articleLarge.jpg


xpelt4osjhxhzkk1ip5d.jpg


OK, maybe there was a clue or two. But maybe they were there to hear the music? I understand these guys did a great job of chanting "Blood and Soil".

a6b8e9e2993a.png



So, let's look at the facts. Very fine people go to a White Supremacist rally, a rally designed to Unite White Supremacists from across the country. At that rally, they see numerous people carrying and wearing KKK and Nazi paraphernalia.

Now, what would you expect a "very fine person" to do in that situation? Turns out Trump's "very fine people" hang around and support the Neo Nazis and KKK. But they're not White Supremacists or racists. Amirite? :lamo




Neo-Nazis Praise Trump's Charlottesville Reaction: 'He Loves Us All'
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom