• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Daily Stormer Founder Should Pay ‘Troll Storm’ Victim $14 Million, Judge Says

Gus Fring said:
Too bad there is no "communism emergency" in the USA, but rather a far-right extremism one.
Click to expand...

A commie terrorist attacked just the other day. Good thing they smoked his ass.
 
Deuce said:
You also commented on this court case, on page one. Do you now disavow those statements?
Click to expand...

Two different animals. No, I don't disavow my comments in my post on page 1. Which would you like to discuss?
 
apdst said:
Two different animals. No, I don't disavow my comments in my post on page 1. Which would you like to discuss?
Click to expand...

The page one comments, the case that is the topic of this thread. I would like to know if you think that's a free speech violation.
 
Deuce said:
The page one comments, the case that is the topic of this thread. I would like to know if you think that's a free speech violation.
Click to expand...

Are the nazi ****er's 1st Amendment rights being violated? No. Why? Because he isn't being prosecuted by the government, but rather being sued in a civil suit.
 
Dragonlady said:
If you call upon others to threaten, intimidate or harm your target, you sure as hell can be charged for that.
Click to expand...

Like when Tanya Gersh calls on her followers to threaten, intimidate, or harm Richard Spencer's mother?
 
3leftsdoo said:
Free speech is literally Hitler.
Click to expand...

Irresponsible speech that causes others to break the law or incites violence is a no no. Court agrees.

But, go ahead and practice your free speech while yelling FIRE in a crowded theater...
 
apdst said:
It's irrelevant because he's protected by the 1st Amendment.
Click to expand...

Wrong, there is plenty of precedent for people that have harassed people on line, particularly intl suicide and are charged.

There is a difference free speach and harassment.

I would think k even the nazi simplifiers on here would comprehend that...
 
GDViking said:
Wrong, there is plenty of precedent for people that have harassed people on line, particularly intl suicide and are charged.

There is a difference free speach and harassment.

I would think k even the nazi simplifiers on here would comprehend that...
Click to expand...

There's no such thing as free speach.
 
HenryChinaski said:
3lefts, I apologize for manipulating your quote. It was extremely dishonest, and likely a breach of forum rules. I won't do it again.
Click to expand...

Apology accepted. :)
 
Dragonlady said:
No it doesn't. You cannot stalk, harass or threaten another person.
Click to expand...

It's vastly more complex than you seem to be either grasping or articulating. Ditto.
 
Gus Fring said:
The bench? Do you call a racist president a "bench"?

Is the cancerous spreading of far-right ideologies and the resurgence of white supremacism into mainstream politics a "bench"?

You are aware that it's also because of NazBols like you that Trump is your president. Are you aware of that?

But again, you think you can fix that by supporting a hawaaian fascist who just happens to be a Democrat because in the USA there is no Ba'ath Party.
Click to expand...

Yes. Your comment makes absolutely no sense.

Your comment makes no sense.

I have no idea what you're talking about - do you have me confused with someone else you intended to slur with your ridiculous and irrelevant ad hom? I'm aware that you're incredibly confused, and also seem quite triggered.

Another extremely bizarre/ludicrous comment from you.
 
Gus Fring said:
Too bad there is no "communism emergency" in the USA, but rather a far-right extremism one.
Click to expand...

Liberal/Democrat hysteria, intolerance, bigotry, ignorance, hatred for the Constitution and complicity with death-mongering plutocrats look pretty serious to me...

But what do I know - I'm all in for Bernie and Tulsi.

:)
 
beefheart said:
Irresponsible speech that causes others to break the law or incites violence is a no no. Court agrees.

But, go ahead and practice your free speech while yelling FIRE in a crowded theater...
Click to expand...

Vastly more complicated. Well, the court behaved idiotically here, but within it's asinine purview.

If there were a fire or similar emergency, one would be acting properly; the matter is complicated.
 
GDViking said:
Wrong, there is plenty of precedent for people that have harassed people on line, particularly intl suicide and are charged.

There is a difference free speach and harassment.

I would think k even the nazi simplifiers on here would comprehend that...
Click to expand...

It's complicated.

But I do understand that far too many liberals despise free speech.
 
Dragonlady said:
I'd shun any business sharing an office space address with white supremacists too. She brought the harm on herself by not disavowing the group or their aims.
Click to expand...

She doesn't love Big Brother big enough.
 
3leftsdoo said:
Vastly more complicated. Well, the court behaved idiotically here, but within it's asinine purview.

If there were a fire or similar emergency, one would be acting properly; the matter is complicated.
Click to expand...

No, the court was right. Stop defending vile racists for a bit it will do your heart good.
 
3leftsdoo said:
Liberal/Democrat hysteria, intolerance, bigotry, ignorance, hatred for the Constitution and complicity with death-mongering plutocrats look pretty serious to me...

But what do I know - I'm all in for Bernie and Tulsi.

:)
Click to expand...

Never heard of "Liberal/Democrat" terrorist attacks. There have been plenty of white supremacist ones tho.

If you think the problem of America are liberals and not a growing far-right terrorist militancy, you are either completely estranged from reality, in denial or accomplice.
 
beefheart said:
No, the court was right. Stop defending vile racists for a bit it will do your heart good.
Click to expand...

Well, the law is an ass, and the judge was certainly acting within asinine discretion, as noted. Ridiculous/nonsensical ad hom.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom