• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Prosecutors unlikely to charge Trump Org executives

Mycroft said:
shrug...

You could...if you were still stuck in the "WHATABOUT!!!" past.

Sorry, but nobody cares about Hill-dog anymore. Not even her own Dems.

btw, speaking of Hillary, did you see the thing about her getting boo'd when Billy Joel dedicated a song to her and Bill?

Go to 2:30



A Billy Joel concert in NYC. Yeah...even THEY don't care about her anymore.
Click to expand...


The fact that you feltvit necessary to point out that she got boo'ed proves my point about the right's endless obsession with Hillary. You denied it, then proved it, all in one post.

:bravo:
 
SLC said:
Well the IG is looking into the FBI's "investigation" of HRC. I'll wait for the IG report to see if there was any malfeasance by the FBI.
Click to expand...

Haven't they already been there and done that?

Inspector General report on FBI and DOJ actions in the 2016 election - Wikipedia

"The OIG discovered text messages and instant messages between three FBI employees which expressed hostility toward 2016 Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump and support for his opponent, Hillary Clinton. The report stated that while there was evidence of political leanings found, the bias did not affect any decision the agents made in their professional capacities relative to the email investigation."

Why does the IG need to investigate this AGAIN? Partisan whining, nothing more.
 
Darth BB said:
The fact that you feltvit necessary to point out that she got boo'ed proves my point about the right's endless obsession with Hillary. You denied it, then proved it, all in one post.

:bravo:
Click to expand...

I disputed...and supported my dispute...your contention.

Seriously. Do you live in the real world? Or the one that allows you to make **** up?
 
SLC said:
Trumpkins? aren't you the same person that was complaining about name calling?
Click to expand...
That's what gets me banned.... but I guess it's a small price to pay to say what I want.
 
haymarket said:
Attacking one basic norm after the other and weakening them or outright destroying them. Respecting the rule of law is one. Understanding and observing how government works through checks and balances is another. Turning the USA from a haven for refugees into an abuser of children and women is a third. Weakening our alliances with long time allies is a fourth. Inviting our main adversary to help him in an election and them getting that help is a deal breaker.

All that hurts our nation. It hurts our system of government. And it hurts our people.
Click to expand...

Come on Hay, the "progressives" have been "Attacking one basic norm after the other and weakening them or outright destroying them. Respecting the rule of law is one." We have Rainbow flags flying high and proud, in the face of all those who see that as an insidious attack, we had the Obama administration deciding which law they would enforce, and on and on. That's all part of the problem. You have mud on your skirts.
 
smallvoice said:
Come on Hay, the "progressives" have been "Attacking one basic norm after the other and weakening them or outright destroying them. Respecting the rule of law is one." We have Rainbow flags flying high and proud, in the face of all those who see that as an insidious attack, we had the Obama administration deciding which law they would enforce, and on and on. That's all part of the problem. You have mud on your skirts.
Click to expand...

How does flying a certain flag weaken our norms that underpin government when we are founded on all men are created equal and endowed with liberty to live their own lives as they see fit without hurting others?
 
haymarket said:
How does flying a certain flag weaken our norms that underpin government when we are founded on all men are created equal and endowed with liberty to live their own lives as they see fit without hurting others?
Click to expand...

It is attacking a norm that the VAST majority of Americans support. THAT'S what a norm is. Have you not been watching while that has occurred? Or do you only see it when it is the R's?
 
smallvoice said:
It is attacking a norm that the VAST majority of Americans support. THAT'S what a norm is. Have you not been watching while that has occurred? Or do you only see it when it is the R's?
Click to expand...

What is that so called NORM that you are referring to that is being violated?
 
dixon01767 said:
The prosecutors were considering charges against the Trump Org. not the President individually. Nothing would have prevented them from bringing an indictment against the Trump companies.
Click to expand...

LOL you that naive? Any action against the Trump Organisation will eventually mean Trump will be involved as he is a narcissist control freak. At best he would have to be called in as a witness and be under oath.. ya like that would ever be allowed by Barr and the Trump minions.
 
dixon01767 said:
To give Mueller what he wanted. An allegation that Trump comitted a crime. Were probably threatening him with the rest of his life in prison. He would of given them whatever they wanted.
Click to expand...
Agreed
 
PeteEU said:
And Ken Starr spent far more to expose Bill Clintons blowjob. Also Mueller got 40 million back, so he actually made profit. And he did identify crimes, but because of Justice Department policy and Barr, no sitting President can be indicted on any crimes.
Click to expand...
Where on earth did you get the wild idea that Mueller recovered 40 million dollars :lamo
 
Darth BB said:
Haven't they already been there and done that?

Inspector General report on FBI and DOJ actions in the 2016 election - Wikipedia

"The OIG discovered text messages and instant messages between three FBI employees which expressed hostility toward 2016 Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump and support for his opponent, Hillary Clinton. The report stated that while there was evidence of political leanings found, the bias did not affect any decision the agents made in their professional capacities relative to the email investigation."

Why does the IG need to investigate this AGAIN? Partisan whining, nothing more.
Click to expand...


Because now we know from emails that what effected their decisions was direction from the justice department that charges would not be brought against Hillary Clinton before they had even conducted the investigation.
 
PeteEU said:
LOL you that naive? Any action against the Trump Organisation will eventually mean Trump will be involved as he is a narcissist control freak. At best he would have to be called in as a witness and be under oath.. ya like that would ever be allowed by Barr and the Trump minions.
Click to expand...


Ah, so as soon as you can get Trump to testify as to his own guilt youll have a case.
 
Ryan Saavedra
‏Verified account @RealSaavedra

BREAKING: Judge confirms SDNY has ended its Trump campaign finance probe

CNN reported earlier in that prosecutors were winding down their probe and were planning not to charge anyone else in the probe

The judge's order Wednesday confirmed the reporting
9:24 AM - 17 Jul 2019

Ryan Saavedra on Twitter: "BREAKING: Judge confirms SDNY has ended its Trump campaign finance probe

CNN reported earlier in that prosecutors were winding down their probe and were planning not to charge anyone else in the probe

The judge's order Wednesday confirmed the reporting
https://t.co/U00KKsreWD"


A federal judge Wednesday confirmed federal prosecutors in New York City ended their investigation into Trump campaign finance violations, which focused on former Trump attorney Michael Cohen and the Trump Organization.

Judge William Pauley confirmed the end of the probe in an order to release the remaining files in the case against Michael Cohen, the former Trump attorney who is serving a three-year prison term for several crimes.

The end of the investigation indicates that no additional Trump Organization executives — a group that includes Donald Trump Jr. — will be charged in the investigation, which was led by attorneys in U.S. attorney’s office in the Southern District of New York (SDNY).

Judge Says SDNY Has Ended Trump Campaign Finance Probe, Orders Michael Cohen Records Unsealed | The Daily Caller
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom