• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Texts between Manafort and ally who appears to be Hannity released

I prefer receiving my insane partisan ranting from Ratchet Madcow, thankyouverymuch!

:donkeyfla
Ewww, you have cable.

Sent from the Oval Office using Putin's MacBook, and Barr's Wi-Fi password.
 
Why don't you stop being insulting and misrepresenting my point?

And why don't you stop pretending that most of the MSM has not been actively biased against Trump since before his election? It has been and remains so.
I've never seen such extreme and engaged unfairness in my life, and I've been paying attention to politics since I was a kid. I do think that Hannity is a balance to that.

a list of those main stream media unfairnesses perpetrated against tRump would be helpful to illustrate your point

... that is assuming you have one
 
Why don't you stop being insulting and misrepresenting my point?

And why don't you stop pretending that most of the MSM has not been actively biased against Trump since before his election? It has been and remains so. I've never seen such extreme and engaged unfairness in my life, and I've been paying attention to politics since I was a kid. I do think that Hannity is a balance to that.
The media has not been biased against Trump. They don't have to be.. Most of the media have just reported what Trump has been saying and doing and that puts him in a bad light. It is not the fault of the media that he is a lying piece of garbage, racist, sexist pig and generally a poor human being that makes it easy for the media. Hell Fox News works overtime trying to cover for the moron...

Hell if anything the media has been protecting the fool and is only relatively recently been pointing out the lies Trump and his administration push. The first year or so, very few media in the US corrected lies from the Trump administration or challenged administration at all.

The irony is that Trump and his administration provide so much negative coverage all on thier own by just tweeting,, that when they finally do manage to do something good it is either drowned out by all the bad ****, or no one believes them because they are constantly caught lying.

The only media that is truly biased is Fox News and 90% of its content is trying to protect Trump, push more lies or deflect attention when not even Fox can hide from Trumps lies... And the main propagandist is Hanity with Fox and Friends being the nr. 1 ass licker.

The Trump administration and the people around them are so corrupt that it makes dictators and the mafia blush.

Sent from my Honor 8X using Tapatalk
 
Before any of the FOX News avengers pull up in here and tell us it doesn't matter cause Hannity doesn't do news:

Screen%252520Shot%2525202018-03-16%252520at%2525201.22.00%252520PM.png


Funny that he didn't mention he was sending love texts to Manafort.

Or explain how he was one of only 3 clients that Michael Cohen had. Trump, a Republican fundraiser paying off a playboy model and......Hannity.
 
I don't think that one lady at one townhall meeting is representative of "the electorate." What she said, though, is that she listens to conservative sources and wasn't aware that there was anything negative in the Mueller Report. I don't see what this has to do with being aware that Hannity is one of Trump's great champions. If she watches "Hannity," then this lady does know this (however low-info she is).

Trump calls all other news organization "Fake News." and praises Fox. Do you think it possible that any of his devoted followers believe him?

I would hope people could recognize Fox for what it is, but posts at DP don't seem to confirm that.
 

The studies from a brief reading do not show unfairness. Bering more negative against somebody may be fair and justifiable. Trump started his presidency by denying a digital attack during our elections by an adversary despite th unanimous decision of all intelligence agencies. He brought it to himself. It is logical to see studies in which Trump received more negative coverage than other presidents during the first months of his presidency...
 
Trump calls all other news organization "Fake News." and praises Fox. Do you think it possible that any of his devoted followers believe him?

I would hope people could recognize Fox for what it is, but posts at DP don't seem to confirm that.

I would hope that you are able to distinguish between "devoted followers" and others. From the posts I read, what I see is that if someone doesn't join the daily "two-minute hates" or dares to suggest that Trump isn't evil incarnate, that person is likely to be branded with any number of derisive terms such as "Trumpkins." Same with those, like me, who suggests that the Office of the Presidency itself deserves respect.

This isn't to say that there aren't Trump supporters who are slavish followers. I think some are, and other have their "groupies" too. But Democrats and progressives had better move beyond their ridiculous characterizations of the majority of Trump supporters as alt.right racists and knuckledraggers.

If you hope to win in 2020, I mean.
 
The studies from a brief reading do not show unfairness. Bering more negative against somebody may be fair and justifiable. Trump started his presidency by denying a digital attack during our elections by an adversary despite th unanimous decision of all intelligence agencies. He brought it to himself. It is logical to see studies in which Trump received more negative coverage than other presidents during the first months of his presidency...

Oh, okay. :roll:
 
I would hope that you are able to distinguish between "devoted followers" and others. From the posts I read, what I see is that if someone doesn't join the daily "two-minute hates" or dares to suggest that Trump isn't evil incarnate, that person is likely to be branded with any number of derisive terms such as "Trumpkins." Same with those, like me, who suggests that the Office of the Presidency itself deserves respect.

This isn't to say that there aren't Trump supporters who are slavish followers. I think some are, and other have their "groupies" too. But Democrats and progressives had better move beyond their ridiculous characterizations of the majority of Trump supporters as alt.right racists and knuckledraggers.

If you hope to win in 2020, I mean.

I'm quite able to make that distinction. I was following your initial train of thought...you said you do not see how anyone could view Hannity as unbiased pretty early on in this thread.
Trump claims that Fox is the real news. Do his followers believe he is lying? Maybe they do....

There's a lot of branding that goes on here. I've not claimed his supporters are all racists, but do think racists find him attractive. I think he appeals to some who have never paid attention to politics before, and think it's fun to chant at rallies and call democrats dumb names, and repeat baseless claims about fake news. I also think some of his supporters do so holding their nose and wishing there was an alternative.

It takes quite a stretch into fantasy to believe Trump has not created the divisive climate we now share. Democrats are not socialists, extremists, terrorist supporters, obstructionists, liars, dirty liberals, TDS sufferers, or any of the other labels dredged up here on a daily basis.

It would be quite nice if both sides could take your advice.
 
Why don't you stop being insulting and misrepresenting my point?

And why don't you stop pretending that most of the MSM has not been actively biased against Trump since before his election? It has been and remains so. I've never seen such extreme and engaged unfairness in my life, and I've been paying attention to politics since I was a kid. I do think that Hannity is a balance to that.

:lamo poor widdle twumpy bear! He so sad!
 
Ewww, you have cable.

Sent from the Oval Office using Putin's MacBook, and Barr's Wi-Fi password.

They cant admit fault at all without deflecting
 
No, there isn't, and yes, they are. Of course. Given the media bias against Trump, Hannity provides a bit of balance. Two extremes are represented here.
Yet that is not what Hannity claims and if you think that he brings balance to anything, well, that says it in itself...
 
Yet that is not what Hannity claims and if you think that he brings balance to anything, well, that says it in itself...
She can't help it. Even when we know Hannity is/was working in conjunction with now convicted felons, the impulse is to blame the mainstream media, like Hannity lives on Mars.

Then again, one needs to live on Mars to compare what Hannity is doing to Maddow's yapping. The equivalence would be Maddow texting Emmanuel Rahm to tell him how they're all on this together.

No such comparison exists. So the best nota can do is repeat that this sort of thing happens all of the time, and never provide proof for it.



Sent from the Oval Office using Putin's MacBook, and Barr's Wi-Fi password.
 
FOX News has now admitted to the veracity of these texts:

Read: Texts detail Hannity-Manafort exchanges | Fox News

In short, Hannity's programming is in complete synchronization with Manafort's view. This goes far beyond the retarded idea that a news personality is speaking well or badly of a president because of similar politic views. Hannity's program is in complete agreement with a convicted felon on how his investigation was handled, the reasons behind it, and has crafted its programing to defend the accused and now convicted.

The equivalent would be Rachel Maddow going to Anthony Weiner for advice on running her show.





Sent from the Oval Office using Putin's MacBook, and Barr's Wi-Fi password.
 
Last edited:
Is there something wrong with that? Hannity isn't a journalist. He hosts news based entertainment shows.

Are people going to suggest any of the other host on cable and network are any different?

I can’t think of any other television news commentator who communicates with witnesses in an ongoing investigation and passes messages back and forth between the witness and the subject of the investigation.

The judge made these e-mails public for a reason.

If this isn’t witness tampering (via a cut out named Hannity), then it’s the very closest thing to it.

And since Dowd has already been implicated in potential witness tampering with regard to the Mueller investigation, it appears that the obstruction of justice section of the Mueller Report will need serious updating by the time the witnesses begin parading in front of Congress.
 
She can't help it. Even when we know Hannity is/was working in conjunction with now convicted felons, the impulse is to blame the mainstream media, like Hannity lives on Mars.

Then again, one needs to live on Mars to compare what Hannity is doing to Maddow's yapping. The equivalence would be Maddow texting Emmanuel Rahm to tell him how they're all on this together.

No such comparison exists. So the best nota can do is repeat that this sort of thing happens all of the time, and never provide proof for it.



Sent from the Oval Office using Putin's MacBook, and Barr's Wi-Fi password.

Yes, we see a lot of “they all do it” and “everybody knows” (preceding some false right wing talk radio meme).

This is not a fact based audience. If it were, it never would have backed Trump.
 
How about he start off his show with that claim? That would be really admitting it!
Do the cheerleaders on the left do that? I watch CNN and I have never seen anyone do that.



Hannity is an opinion talk show guy not a news caster. Its amazing our liberal friends can't seem to understand the difference.
 
Do the cheerleaders on the left do that? I watch CNN and I have never seen anyone do that.



Hannity is an opinion talk show guy not a news caster. Its amazing our liberal friends can't seem to understand the difference.
Hannity disagrees with you. He says he breaks news every night. Come on.

Sent from the Oval Office using Putin's MacBook, and Barr's Wi-Fi password.
 
Back
Top Bottom