• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump Tweets, and Then Retracts, Statement That Russia Helped Him Get Elected Video

So, now, you're all whiny and bitchy because Trump pranked you and you have to flail about impotently spewing TDS tripe to sooth your pride? Go ahead I need a good laugh. :lamo

Dont believe the poster is a trump supporter
 
The opposite of what is true?

What is the "it" which cannot be made up?

Where is the tweet saying that
Trump on Thursday acknowledged for the first time that Russia helped “me to get elected,”
I want to see THAT tweet.
The tweet you are posting says exactly the opposite.
 
Where is the tweet saying that
I want to see THAT tweet.
The tweet you are posting says exactly the opposite.

How do you interpret the words "...Russia helping me get elected..."?

Those are the word Trump tweeted.

What do they mean to you?
 
How do you interpret the words "...Russia helping me get elected..."?

Those are the word Trump tweeted.

What do they mean to you?

That he got elected on his own merit.
 

I'll do you one better....Here is the title of the story in your link in the OP

"Trump Accuses Mueller of a Personal Vendetta as Calls for Impeachment Grow"

And here is what your thread title says:

"Trump Tweets, and Then Retracts, Statement That Russia Helped Him Get Elected Video"

The two have NOTHING to do with each other....So what gives here? It would seem you are taking up band width just to further the hatred and being quite dishonest in the process....
 

Ok, where in there does the President say: "President Trump tweeted on Thursday that Russia helped “me to get elected,”... As put out by the OP....In fact, this now 2nd link which has NOTHING to do with Russia helping Trump get elected....In fact he says just the opposite in the very tweet you posted here...

"I had nothing to do with Russia helping me to get elected." is taking the entirety of the tweet out of context...It is sad to see such dishonesty pass for intellectual debate these days.
 
Cynical liberal hysteria around Trump, now with massive amounts of bigoted ageism.

:donkeyfla

Bunch of bull****. The man typed it out the way he typed it out. Is it the left's fault that he can't figure out the whole grammar thing?
 
Ok, where in there does the President say: "President Trump tweeted on Thursday that Russia helped “me to get elected,”... As put out by the OP....In fact, this now 2nd link which has NOTHING to do with Russia helping Trump get elected.
It looks like NYT changes the headline at some point.
The link address is still
https :// www .nytimes.com/2019/05/30/us/politics/trump-russia-help-elected.html?smid=fb-nytimes&smtyp=cur

The video at the top of the page is about the tweet
TrumpTweet.jpg




...In fact he says just the opposite in the very tweet you posted here...
"I had nothing to do with Russia helping me to get elected." is taking the entirety of the tweet out of context...It is sad to see such dishonesty pass for intellectual debate these days.

To you, Trump saying that he did not help Russia interfere in the election means Trump is saying that Russia did not interfere in the election?
 
It looks like NYT changes the headline at some point.
The link address is still
https :// www .nytimes.com/2019/05/30/us/politics/trump-russia-help-elected.html?smid=fb-nytimes&smtyp=cur

The video at the top of the page is about the tweet






To you, Trump saying that he did not help Russia interfere in the election means Trump is saying that Russia did not interfere in the election?

No, I think he is saying that Russia did interfere, however, he didn't have anything to do with that...
 
No, I think he is saying that Russia did interfere, however, he didn't have anything to do with that...

The Russian govt interfered with our elections on behalf of Trump
&
Trump did not assist them with those processes


This is what the article you object to is saying as well.
 
Mueller's report said as much. What it didn't say was that the campaign solicited that help.

I cant tell if its crying wolf or chicken little anymore.
At no point in the Mueller report was president Trump regarded as innocent of any crime. He was not declared innocent in any court of law because the Mueller report was never meant to indict the president but leave it on Congress. Nancy Pelosi has refused to acknowledge calls within her party and one vocal Republican. We know the Senate will never convict Trump. Instead they've chosen to give their powers away to a different branch.

That I have to explain why this is bad to someone is insane.

Sent from the Oval Office using Putin's MacBook, and Barr's Wi-Fi password.
 
At no point in the Mueller report was president Trump regarded as innocent of any crime. He was not declared innocent in any court of law because the Mueller report was never meant to indict the president but leave it on Congress. Nancy Pelosi has refused to acknowledge calls within her party and one vocal Republican. We know the Senate will never convict Trump. Instead they've chosen to give their powers away to a different branch.

That I have to explain why this is bad to someone is insane.

Sent from the Oval Office using Putin's MacBook, and Barr's Wi-Fi password.

Horse****. Mueller is a DoJ employee, not a legislative branch employee. Every single officer of the court in the entire of the United States knows there are 2 states, guilty and not guilty. Not innocent is not a legal state in the United States. You either prove guilt or they remain innocent.
 
Innocent until proven guilty. Mueller did not prove Trump guilty therefore he remains innocent!!!
 
Horse****. Mueller is a DoJ employee, not a legislative branch employee. Every single officer of the court in the entire of the United States knows there are 2 states, guilty and not guilty. Not innocent is not a legal state in the United States. You either prove guilt or they remain innocent.
Again, Mueller state in his report, clearly that the report did not in any way exhonorate the president. If nothing else, it found various connections between the Trump administration and Russian sources. It also established that Trump may have committed obstruction of justice and identified some of these issues. They include witness tampering and the falsification of documents to that gave an image of innocense.

Mueller Report - Wikipedia

It also identifies*links between Trump campaign officials and individuals with ties to the Russian government,[16]*about which several persons connected to the campaign made false statements and obstructed investigations.[17]

Furthermore:

The report describes*ten notable episodeswhere Trump could have obstructed justice while president and one before he was elected,[37][38]*noting that he privately tried to "control the investigation" in multiple ways, but mostly failed to influence it because his subordinates or associates refused to carry out his instructions.[39][40][41]*The report further states that*Congress*can decide whether Trump obstructed justice,[24]*as Congress has the authority to take action against a president for wrongdoing,[42][43]*in reference to potential*impeachment proceedings.[44][45]

You are simply wrong.





Sent from the Oval Office using Putin's MacBook, and Barr's Wi-Fi password.
 
Innocent until proven guilty. Mueller did not prove Trump guilty therefore he remains innocent!!!
The Mueller Report is an investigative document. It out the onus of convicting on Congress. With a divided congress, conviction is unlikely.

We have been through this.

Sent from the Oval Office using Putin's MacBook, and Barr's Wi-Fi password.
 
He's trolling the loony left - obviously caught a couple right here on DP. :lamo

I like this repeated marching order talking point. "He's trolling the left!" Which is then admitting that he intentionally said exactly what he wanted to.

I guess the sycophants didn't think about that.
 
No, I think he is saying that Russia did interfere, however, he didn't have anything to do with that...

Right, so they interfered and helped him win as he said. You're just flailing around at anything you cinsider anti-Trump, or basically anything that casts doubt on his divinity, and say the same thing the article does.
 
Innocent until proven guilty. Mueller did not prove Trump guilty therefore he remains innocent!!!

That's not the standard here. Not that it will stop you from insisting on it.
 
I like this repeated marching order talking point. "He's trolling the left!" Which is then admitting that he intentionally said exactly what he wanted to.

I guess the sycophants didn't think about that.

They're basically saying "don't listen to him" which has to ve the first time a President's supporters told everybody to ignore him because he's a child.

They also think trolling is what a President should do.
 
I like this repeated marching order talking point. "He's trolling the left!" Which is then admitting that he intentionally said exactly what he wanted to.

I guess the sycophants didn't think about that.

They're basically saying "don't listen to him" which has to ve the first time a President's supporters told everybody to ignore him because he's a child.

They also think trolling is what a President should do.


Imagine what a pathetic loser someone would have to be to think it's appropriate for the president of a country to spend their time trolling the population they are supposed to represent.

Imagine being that desperate to "feel like a winner." Dang, they must have lost at every turn in life. Sad.
 
Back
Top Bottom