• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Deutsche Bank Staff Saw Suspicious Activity in Trump and Kushner Accounts

HumblePi said:
Deutsche bank has been money laundering for years and of course if anyone needed laundered money, it's been Trump since no other bank would have anything to do with Trump. He's a racketeer, plain and simple. The chain of command at the bank took a look at this suspicious activity and overruled their employees. Two years ago Deutsche Bank was fined $630 million in penalties for laundering more than 10 billion dollars of Russian dark money. That $630 million fine is worth it to a bank that makes billions.
Click to expand...

All this time and no one ever noticed?
 
Casper said:
Now finally they are going down right rabbit hole.
Click to expand...

Arguably, this was always one of the important matters surrounding Trump. It's not like Democrats had any say in the matter for the first two years, and after they retook the House they started the process into looking at his financial affairs right away.
 
Last edited:
Trump said:
eliminates those moaners on election night and those after Mueller Report released )
Click to expand...

Hearing you came when trump was elected is too much information.

Your latter moans are most likely caused by cognitive dissonance.
 
apdst said:
Nevermind proof, though. Right?
Click to expand...

So they can't see any evidence and you want proof.

Kinda like McConnell blocking anything Obama tried and then denigrating him for getting nothing done.
 
apdst said:
What's y'all excuse going to be when they don't find anything, again?
Click to expand...

Why do you ask?

You are obviously just going to say they didn't find anything, whatever it is.

That's what you're doing right now.
 
Cardinal said:
We're officially at a point where it's going to be a matter of public record that Trump was a money launderer, and the country's going to respond collectively, "Well duh."
Click to expand...


Well, let us know then when the "point" becomes reality.

Until then, the NYT story is warmed up hyperboleing from 1 1/2 years ago.
 
Cardinal said:
We're officially at a point where it's going to be a matter of public record that Trump was a money launderer, and the country's going to respond collectively, "Well duh."
Click to expand...

And at the point of another ruined liberal orgasm.
 
The Peacher conspiracy theories become wilder and more desperate by the moment...
 
Barnacle said:
Well, let us know then when the "point" becomes reality.

Until then, the NYT story is warmed up hyperboleing from 1 1/2 years ago.
Click to expand...

You don't appear to know what "hyperbole" means.
 
Cardinal said:
You don't appear to know what "hyperbole" means.
Click to expand...


Seeing as you're having a problem with the choice of my words, I'll rephrase my statements:

"Well, let us know then when the "point" becomes reality.

Until then, the NYT story is warmed up BS from 1 1/2 years ago."
 
Barnacle said:
Seeing as you're having a problem with the choice of my words, I'll rephrase my statements:

"Well, let us know then when the "point" becomes reality.

Until then, the NYT story is warmed up BS from 1 1/2 years ago."
Click to expand...

You didn't point to any reason why you consider it BS. Maybe you just don't know what that means either.
 
apdst said:
All this time and no one ever noticed?
Click to expand...

Of course someone noticed. The only people that didn't know this are Trump supporters because they didn't want to believe it. As the evidence becomes more transparent and Congress subpoenas Deutsche Bank for more information, it will all get flushed out into the public domain. Trump has been found guilty of money laundering before and paid heavy fines for it too. The Trump Taj Mahal casino was involved in money laundering for years. His history certainly gives grounds to Congress to investigate into what's going on with Deutsche bank to not turning over to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Center activity indicating suspicious movements of money by Trump, and that includes 2017 when he was president. When Trump became president, he did owe Deutsche Bank $300 million dollars at that time.

Deutsche Bank faces action over $20bn Russian money-laundering scheme | Business | The Guardian
 
HumblePi said:
Of course someone noticed. The only people that didn't know this are Trump supporters because they didn't want to believe it. As the evidence becomes more transparent and Congress subpoenas Deutsche Bank for more information, it will all get flushed out into the public domain. Trump has been found guilty of money laundering before and paid heavy fines for it too. The Trump Taj Mahal casino was involved in money laundering for years. His history certainly gives grounds to Congress to investigate into what's going on with Deutsche bank to not turning over to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Center activity indicating suspicious movements of money by Trump, and that includes 2017 when he was president. When Trump became president, he did owe Deutsche Bank $300 million dollars at that time.

Deutsche Bank faces action over $20bn Russian money-laundering scheme | Business | The Guardian
Click to expand...


Another BS statement ...
 
HumblePi said:
Of course someone noticed. The only people that didn't know this are Trump supporters because they didn't want to believe it. As the evidence becomes more transparent and Congress subpoenas Deutsche Bank for more information, it will all get flushed out into the public domain. Trump has been found guilty of money laundering before and paid heavy fines for it too. The Trump Taj Mahal casino was involved in money laundering for years. His history certainly gives grounds to Congress to investigate into what's going on with Deutsche bank to not turning over to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Center activity indicating suspicious movements of money by Trump, and that includes 2017 when he was president. When Trump became president, he did owe Deutsche Bank $300 million dollars at that time.

Deutsche Bank faces action over $20bn Russian money-laundering scheme | Business | The Guardian
Click to expand...

You said Trump was launsering money all this time.
 
Prediction:

Giuliani on CNN: "Money laundering isn't a crime."
 
What if...? said:
Why do you ask?

You are obviously just going to say they didn't find anything, whatever it is.

That's what you're doing right now.
Click to expand...

Mueller didn't find anything. What makes you think Congress is going to find anything?
 
Barnacle said:
Another BS statement ...
Click to expand...

Can you be a little more precise about your allegation so that I may address it in a cohesive manner? If you're referring to the previous money laundering to which he has had to pay hefty fines for, I will refer you to his casinos in Atlantic City. Heck even his father Fred Trump pulled a shifty illegal trick in order to infuse cash into the struggling casino when it had a bank balloon payment due.

The Trump Taj Mahal casino broke anti-money laundering rules 106 times in its first year and a half of operation in the early 1990s, according to the IRS in a 1998 settlement agreement.
It's a bit of forgotten history that's buried in federal records held by an investigative unit of the Treasury Department, records that congressional committees investigating Trump's ties to Russia have obtained access to.

The casino repeatedly failed to properly report gamblers who cashed out $10,000 or more in a single day, the government said. Trump's casino ended up paying the Treasury Department a $477,000 fine in 1998 without admitting any liability under the Bank Secrecy Act. 417 pages of Treasury Department documents were released under the Freedom of Information Act. The records included the 1998 settlement, draft and final copies of a similar settlement in 2015, and exchanges between the Trump casino lawyers and federal regulators. The 1998 settlement was publicly reported at the time, and the Associated Press noted it was the largest fine the federal government ever slapped on a casino for violating the Bank Secrecy Act.
 
Last edited:
Cardinal said:
Prediction:

Giuliani on CNN: "Money laundering isn't a crime."
Click to expand...

Prediction:

Congress won't find anything, but they'll insist they did; they just can't show us. :lamo
 
apdst said:
Mueller didn't find anything. What makes you think Congress is going to find anything?
Click to expand...

Why are you even talking about a report you obviously didn't read or couldn't understand?
 
Trump said:
Define "Everybody"
Click to expand...
You know if you have to ask, but here it is anyway: Intelligent people who maintain a modicum of integrity, clearly not something you are either familiar with or interested in.
 
apdst said:
Prediction:

Congress won't find anything, but they'll insist they did; they just can't show us. :lamo
Click to expand...

That's the Republican plan isn't it? The stonewalling and violations of subpoenas are proof of that. Nobody wants to turn over documents or give testimony because they know very well how damaging it will be for Trump. How can Congress show you or anyone else documents that Trump goes in defiance of Congress to shield from public view? (insert little laugh emoticon here)
 
HumblePi said:
Can you be a little more precise about your allegation so that I may address it in a cohesive manner? If you're referring to the previous money laundering to which he has had to pay hefty fines for, I will refer you to his casinos in Atlantic City. Heck even his father Fred Trump pulled a shifty illegal trick in order to infuse cash into the struggling casino when it had a bank balloon payment due.

The Trump Taj Mahal casino broke anti-money laundering rules 106 times in its first year and a half of operation in the early 1990s, according to the IRS in a 1998 settlement agreement.
It's a bit of forgotten history that's buried in federal records held by an investigative unit of the Treasury Department, records that congressional committees investigating Trump's ties to Russia have obtained access to.

The casino repeatedly failed to properly report gamblers who cashed out $10,000 or more in a single day, the government said. Trump's casino ended up paying the Treasury Department a $477,000 fine in 1998 without admitting any liability under the Bank Secrecy Act. 417 pages of Treasury Department documents were released under the Freedom of Information Act. The records included the 1998 settlement, draft and final copies of a similar settlement in 2015, and exchanges between the Trump casino lawyers and federal regulators. The 1998 settlement was publicly reported at the time, and the Associated Press noted it was the largest fine the federal government ever slapped on a casino for violating the Bank Secrecy Act.
Click to expand...


It's good to see that you corrected yourself ... :lol:

Your previous statement: "... Trump has been found guilty of money laundering before ..."

Your corrected statement: "... Trump Taj Mahal casino broke anti-money laundering rules ..."
 
calamity said:
I saw suspicious material when Justice Kennedy resigned a day before the news broke that his son lent Trump a $1B.

The Right Wing coup is in full swing. Deny Obama Judge Garland. Conspire with Russians to steal the election from Hillary. Insert two new SCOTUS Judges and a host of appellate ones, then own the Judicial Branch for a generation.

Fait accompli
Click to expand...

*I saw suspicious material when Justice Kennedy resigned a day before the news broke that his son lent Trump a $1B.*

Obviously you're seeing things.

"We rate this claim False."

Did Justice Kennedy quit due to family ties to Trump and Russia? | PolitiFact
 
Cardinal said:
This is why Trump is trying to block Congress from subpoenaing his financial records from Deutsch Bank, or at the very least to put it off until after the 2020 election. Everybody knows Trump was laundering money, and all he's trying to do is stall that revelation from being a matter of public record for as long as humanly possible.





Deutsche Bank Staff Saw Suspicious Activity in Trump and Kushner Accounts - The New York Times
Click to expand...

Oligarchs have used a number of banks in the former eastern & western Europe to launder thru banks in other countries

Odd how they can ID suspicious transfers but 10's of billions or more are laundered weekly

Off topic but I think Russians have been pillaged for at least 1 Trillion USD and in all probability 2 T plus
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom