• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

NYT: Trump’s Trade War Escalation Will Exact Economic Pain, Adviser Says

Threegoofs said:
Yes.

The alternative Conservative universe... where budget surpluses are bad, and high real estate prices mean low demand. When Democrats are in charge.
Click to expand...

So does your state pay deficit service or debt service? Budget surpluses aren't bad unless you create those surpluses by kicking the state problems down the road which California and liberals always do

You seem to have a real loyalty to the state o California, wonder if the homeless, those in poverty feel the same way?
 
Conservative said:
So does your state pay deficit service or debt service? Budget surpluses aren't bad unless you create those surpluses by kicking the state problems down the road which California and liberals always do

You seem to have a real loyalty to the state o California, wonder if the homeless, those in poverty feel the same way?
Click to expand...

If they don't, they can always go to Texas where houses are cheap and jobs plentiful.
 
Conservative said:
So does your state pay deficit service or debt service? Budget surpluses aren't bad unless you create those surpluses by kicking the state problems down the road which California and liberals always do

You seem to have a real loyalty to the state o California, wonder if the homeless, those in poverty feel the same way?
Click to expand...

Odd that you want to talk about anything but high real estate prices in California.

Maybe it’s because you DO understand supply and demand, but have a fixed ideology that doesn’t conform with reality.
 
Dittohead not! said:
If they don't, they can always go to Texas where houses are cheap and jobs plentiful.
Click to expand...

Yes, liberal arrogance on full display, people are indeed moving to TX for low wages, no health insurance, high pollution because they don't know any better and need the nanny state like you have in California. Homes are cheaper in Texas because supply is plentiful in TX, a concept you will never understand or don't care to learn about
 
Threegoofs said:
Odd that you want to talk about anything but high real estate prices in California.

Maybe it’s because you DO understand supply and demand, but have a fixed ideology that doesn’t conform with reality.
Click to expand...

I understand what you don't builders aren't going to California because of the massive costs of doing business in California, My "fixed" ideology is one of logic, common sense, and the understanding of the private sector including incentive that you don't
 
Conservative said:
Yes, liberal arrogance on full display, people are indeed moving to TX for low wages, no health insurance, high pollution because they don't know any better and need the nanny state like you have in California. Homes are cheaper in Texas because supply is plentiful in TX, a concept you will never understand or don't care to learn about
Click to expand...

What are you talking about? I've already said that houses are expensive in California due to supply and demand. If houses in Texas are plentiful, then it follows that they will be less expensive.

Since it is the poor who are moving out of California, it follows that the first part of your post is right on.
 
Conservative said:
I understand what you don't builders aren't going to California because of the massive costs of doing business in California, My "fixed" ideology is one of logic, common sense, and the understanding of the private sector including incentive that you don't
Click to expand...

Builders are busy in the Golden State, mostly building large high end homes for the wealthy people who keep moving there.
 
It will exact some pain, but it's a necessary price to stick it to China. I don't think most people understand the threat and humanitarian crisis China poses to the world. We cannot continue to allow them to abuse US (and other foreign) businesses and enable their rise to superpower status. We have a moral obligation to decouple and exact economic pain on China and push for the destruction/destabilization of the Chinese Communist Party.
 
So you believe it is a poor that are leaving California? Do you really live in a personal bubble where you are clueless about what goes on in your own state? It isn't the poor moving out it is retiring as well as the taxpayers to be replaced by illegals and those looking for a free lunch which California offers

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
 
Dittohead not! said:
Builders are busy in the Golden State, mostly building large high end homes for the wealthy people who keep moving there.
Click to expand...
I posted a link explaining the housing crisis in California, I'm not going to do it again because you ignored it the problem is Supply in California and the massive regulations, EPA, taxes and permitting process the builders have to go through there

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
 
Conservative said:
I posted a link explaining the housing crisis in California, I'm not going to do it again because you ignored it the problem is Supply in California and the massive regulations, EPA, taxes and permitting process the builders have to go through there

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

So, you think it's all on the supply side, not demand?

And yet the population of the state is approaching 40 million. Interesting. Actually, inexpensive houses are still available in parts of California, parts that have less demand for houses. How do you explain that?
 
Conservative said:
I posted a link explaining the housing crisis in California, I'm not going to do it again because you ignored it the problem is Supply in California and the massive regulations, EPA, taxes and permitting process the builders have to go through there

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

So, you think it's all on the supply side, not demand?

And yet the population of the state is approaching 40 million. Interesting. Actually, inexpensive houses are still available in parts of California, parts that have less demand for houses. How do you explain that?
 
Dittohead not! said:
So, you think it's all on the supply side, not demand?

And yet the population of the state is approaching 40 million. Interesting. Actually, inexpensive houses are still available in parts of California, parts that have less demand for houses. How do you explain that?
Click to expand...

San Francisco used to be one the most beautiful in the country that has turned into a homeless hell hole of radicals who have destroyed the city. You can bury your head in the sand, support your state, and have zero credibility, your choice. guess it is always easier to bury your head in the sand vs. address or even recognize the issue.

Homelessness in the San Francisco Bay Area - Wikipedia

SF homeless population swells by 17% in latest tally - SFChronicle.com

san francisco homeless pictures - Google Search
 
Dittohead not! said:
So, you think it's all on the supply side, not demand?

And yet the population of the state is approaching 40 million. Interesting. Actually, inexpensive houses are still available in parts of California, parts that have less demand for houses. How do you explain that?
Click to expand...

Of course it is about both but address the supply, make it easier for builders to build homes and that will handle the demand.
 
Conservative said:
Of course it is about both but address the supply, make it easier for builders to build homes and that will handle the demand.
Click to expand...

What demand?

You said everyone is leaving CA because of its liberal hellhole qualities... like high housing costs.

So many people want to live in CA, they’d rather be homeless there than have a home in some red state!
 
Conservative said:
San Francisco used to be one the most beautiful in the country that has turned into a homeless hell hole of radicals who have destroyed the city. You can bury your head in the sand, support your state, and have zero credibility, your choice. guess it is always easier to bury your head in the sand vs. address or even recognize the issue.

Homelessness in the San Francisco Bay Area - Wikipedia

SF homeless population swells by 17% in latest tally - SFChronicle.com

san francisco homeless pictures - Google Search
Click to expand...



There is more to California than San Francisco. Of course, if you have the bucks you can live in SF:

office-sanfrancisco_768x582.jpg


Or, you could opt to live in Bakersfield:

nwm_medium.jpg


for a lot less.

Single Family for sale in 132 Price Street, Bakersfield, CA, 93307
132 Price Street, Bakersfield, CA
$145,000 USD
See more in: Bakersfield Rexland Acres 93307
2 Beds 1 Baths 912 Sqft 0.14 ac Lot Size Single family
Less than one day on Point2 Homes
Favorite Map
Click to expand...

Some places have a high demand for housing, others not so much. Generally, a high demand for houses means a lot of people want to live there.
 
Conservative said:
Of course it is about both but address the supply, make it easier for builders to build homes and that will handle the demand.
Click to expand...

Why would they want to do that?

When Red States sends its people, they're not sending their best ... They're sending people that have lots of problems...they're bringing drugs, they're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.

Better to keep housing prices high. That works far better than any wall to keep Red Staters out.
 
Last edited:
Conservative said:
Of course it is about both but address the supply, make it easier for builders to build homes and that will handle the demand.
Click to expand...

Where are they going to build more houses in the LA or SF areas? Did you check out the availability of land with water?
 
Threegoofs said:
What demand?

You said everyone is leaving CA because of its liberal hellhole qualities... like high housing costs.

So many people want to live in CA, they’d rather be homeless there than have a home in some red state!
Click to expand...

This is an absolute waste of time, you want to defend California and have no credibility so be it

san francisco homeless pictures - Google Search
 
Conservative said:
Not my problem, yours!!

san francisco homeless pictures - Google Search
Click to expand...

OMG!!!! An American City with Homeless people!

LIBERALSSS!!! HILLAARRRYYYY!!!!! BENGHAAAAAAAAAAAAZIII!!!!

Now that we have that out of the way, of course there are lots of homeless people in CA. It's got a great climate to start with. It's got great beaches. Beautiful vistas. Even homeless people recognize a good thing.
 
Last edited:
JustHanging said:
Why would they want to do that?

When Red States sends its people, they're not sending their best ... They're sending people that have lots of problems...they're bringing drugs, they're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.

Better to keep housing prices high. That works far better than any wall to keep Red Staters out.
Click to expand...

You keep buying what the left tells you but the reality is Canadians would like nothing better than having the U.S. return to the Obama policies of appeasement and feel good rhetoric while implementing the entitlement ideology and massive central gov't so that your country doesn't have to take care of itself.

I really don't see any reason to continue this with Canadians who have opinions based upon biased information and leftwing media spin but are totally clueless when it comes to economic results and official data nor do Canadians care about actual facts.

People move into California for various reasons so keep ignoring the negative reasons of the social programs offered by the state including illegals and sanctuary cities.
 
Dittohead not! said:
There is more to California than San Francisco. Of course, if you have the bucks you can live in SF:

office-sanfrancisco_768x582.jpg


Or, you could opt to live in Bakersfield:

nwm_medium.jpg


for a lot less.



Some places have a high demand for housing, others not so much. Generally, a high demand for houses means a lot of people want to live there.
Click to expand...

Eliminate LA, SF, and San Diego and you have a Red State!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom