• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Judge expedites Trump lawsuit to block House subpoena of his accountant

There are also still a whole bunch of little kids living in tents in the desert. I haven't seen anyone dying in any of my city streets lately, have you?

Of their own parent's actions, in an effort to subvert the countries set rules for immigration. Yes, we know you don't care for much else save for the whole "but what about the children" façade that the lot of you like to put on.

I'll worry about the 2.5 million legal children, starving in the streets here. Then the children being held in government sponsored care at the border. Who are given far better amenities, in more than one retrospect.
 
Of their own parent's actions, in an effort to subvert the countries set rules for immigration. Yes, we know you don't care for much else save for the whole "but what about the children" façade that the lot of you like to put on.

I'll worry about the 2.5 million legal children, starving in the streets here. Then the children being held in government sponsored care at the border. Who are given far better amenities, in more than one retrospect.

Your response was exactly as expected from you. Where are these "2.5 million (2,500,000) LEGAL children starving in the streets here"? Where are they, show me, prove that ridiculous claim. That's 100% hyperbole not to mention idiotic of you to just pull a stupid number out of thin air. That's precisely why I have never believed a single word from you. You just make **** up.
 
Last edited:
I provided the actual case citations all through this thread -- most recently directly in response to you. Don't pretend that you didn't see them.
Except they weren't on point, as I pointed out. Most dealt with IRS responding to tax protester attempts to declare income tax illegal. Even the quote you provided showed the judge was skeptical of the committee's motivation.
 
Keep going, Dems!

The same investigations over and over and over and over, hoping for a different result each time.

No more do-overs.

But it's greatly helping us in the polls, so by all means, carry on!
 
Your response was exactly as expected from you. Where are these "2.5 million (2,500,000) LEGAL children starving in the streets here"? Where are they, show me, prove that ridiculous claim. That's 100% hyperbole not to mention idiotic of you to just pull a stupid number out of thin air. That's precisely why I have never believed a single word from you. You just make **** up.

There is a large segment of America that continues to struggle mightily.

Democrats completely ignore them because they either vote Democrat anyway, or vote Republican anyway. So the focus stays on the illegals and the "opportunity" of their votes in the future.
 
There is a large segment of America that continues to struggle mightily.

Democrats completely ignore them because they either vote Democrat anyway, or vote Republican anyway. So the focus stays on the illegals and the "opportunity" of their votes in the future.

Of course, there are many millions of Americans struggling to keep their heads above water. The minimum wage in the US has been at $7.25 an hour since 2009. People have to hold two jobs to survive. But he boldly claimed that there are "2.5 legal children literally starving in the streets of America" and that's absolutely NOT true.
 
A good example of the mindless, deranged partisan BS I was referring to. :cool:

Yes - Trumpkins are a good example of that mindless. deranged partisan BS.
 
They are the governments property, because they are not in the hands of private citizens. The records are for the IRS, not the individual tax payer. The 4th only applies to property that belongs to individuals, so IRS records don't qualify.

If you can't understand this, you really shouldn't be voting.

Whether that is true or not, it's still an abuse of power by turning the IRS into a weapon.

Nixon did it.
Obama bootlickers did it.
Now House Dems want to do it.

And it's wrong.
 
Your response was exactly as expected from you. Where are these "2.5 million (2,500,000) LEGAL children starving in the streets here"? Where are they, show me, prove that ridiculous claim. That's 100% hyperbole not to mention idiotic of you to just pull a stupid number out of thin air. That's precisely why I have never believed a single word from you. You just make **** up.

National Center on Family Homelessness | American Institutes for Research

So what lie are you going to try and pull out of your ass this time?
 
Once again -- this issue is long settled law.

I see your problem now. You can't comprehend. The post is about disclosing what is contained in those income tax forms. It has nothing to do with collecting taxes.
 
This expediting is good for both sides in a way. If the ruling goes in Trump's favor, we'll know sooner rather than later; on the other hand if Trump's intention was just to stall, we'll know sooner rather than later.
 
I see your problem now. You can't comprehend. The post is about disclosing what is contained in those income tax forms. It has nothing to do with collecting taxes.
Obviously, nobody cares about the envelope the taxes were in. The crux is clearly about what's in the taxes.

I think it is you who can't comprehend that courts have repeatedly ruled that taxes and business documents held at third parties have no 4th Amendment protections.
 
National Center on Family Homelessness | American Institutes for Research

So what lie are you going to try and pull out of your ass this time?

The lie you told has not been verified as truth by this article, not even close. You clearly said "2.5 million legal children starving in the streets here". Your article didn't verify that and if you think it did, you better read it again comrade. Let me explain to you, with illustration, how the NCHL collected their information on child homelessness, and it is not child "starvation".

Here's the report, feel free to read it yourself and prove your claim to me. https://nche.ed.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Federal-Data-Summary-SY-14.15-to-16.17-Final-Published-2.12.19.pdf I'll move on to the data collected.

"The data collected is of homeless students enrolled in public schools. "For the purposes of this report, the term state refers to all reporting entities, including the 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico." The information in this report is a compilation of data about students who experienced homelessness during SYs2014-15, 2015-16, and2016-17. Students are included in this report if, at any point during those school years, they were enrolled in school and determined to be homeless by LEA homeless liaisons."

"A student’s primary nighttime residence is determined at the time of the initial identification of a child or youth as experiencing homelessness and is divided into four categories for data collection purposes: sheltered, unsheltered, hotels or motels, and doubled-up. The sheltered category includes all types of homeless shelters and transitional living programs, as well as students awaiting foster care placement. Unsheltered students include those living in cars, abandoned buildings, places not meant for humans to live, and substandard housing.Students living in hotels and motels are included when they lack alternative,adequate accommodations and their housing cannot be considered fixed, regular, and adequate. students who are doubled-up are those who are sharing housing with others due to a loss of housing, economic hardship, or a similar reason. To be considered homeless, students sharing housing must also be determined to lack fixed, regular, and adequate nighttime residence."


To sum this up, my point is that you were intentionally misleading with your false statement that "2.5 million legal children are starving in the streets here." That's a lie. The study was clearly conducted on students currently registered in school that have no 'permanent' residence. They're staying in foster homes, the homes of relatives, motels, or transitional homes waiting for foster homes. They are not starving in the streets. And yes, there are some children living with their displaced parent in abandoned buildings or in their mobile home or even their car. But there is no way in hell that all 2.5 million are without a roof over their heads or starving as you claimed. Good try though comrade, keep trying.

Screenshot-2019-05-16-Federal-data-summary-School-Years-2014-15.png
 
Last edited:
National Center on Family Homelessness | American Institutes for Research

So what lie are you going to try and pull out of your ass this time?

The first sentence in your defence of your assertion that there were "2.5 million (2,500,000) LEGAL children starving in the streets here" was


A staggering 2.5 million children are now homeless each year in America. This historic high represents one in every 30 children in the United States.

and a search of the entire article does not produce one instance of either the word "starve" or the word "starving".

Now either

  • "starving" and "homeless" mean the same thing; or
  • your article in defence of your original assertion doesn't do what you appear to claim it does;

and I'd really appreciate it if you could tell me which one is applicable - can you?
 
The lie you told has not been verified as truth by this article, not even close. You clearly said "2.5 million legal children starving in the streets here". Your article didn't verify that and if you think it did, you better read it again comrade. Let me explain to you, with illustration, how the NCHL collected their information on child homelessness, and it is not child "starvation".

Here's the report, feel free to read it yourself and prove your claim to me. https://nche.ed.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Federal-Data-Summary-SY-14.15-to-16.17-Final-Published-2.12.19.pdf I'll move on to the data collected.

"The data collected is of homeless students enrolled in public schools. "For the purposes of this report, the term state refers to all reporting entities, including the 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico." The information in this report is a compilation of data about students who experienced homelessness during SYs2014-15, 2015-16, and2016-17. Students are included in this report if, at any point during those school years, they were enrolled in school and determined to be homeless by LEA homeless liaisons."

"A student’s primary nighttime residence is determined at the time of the initial identification of a child or youth as experiencing homelessness and is divided into four categories for data collection purposes: sheltered, unsheltered, hotels or motels, and doubled-up. The sheltered category includes all types of homeless shelters and transitional living programs, as well as students awaiting foster care placement. Unsheltered students include those living in cars, abandoned buildings, places not meant for humans to live, and substandard housing.Students living in hotels and motels are included when they lack alternative,adequate accommodations and their housing cannot be considered fixed, regular, and adequate. students who are doubled-up are those who are sharing housing with others due to a loss of housing, economic hardship, or a similar reason. To be considered homeless, students sharing housing must also be determined to lack fixed, regular, and adequate nighttime residence."


To sum this up, my point is that you were intentionally misleading with your false statement that "2.5 million legal children are starving in the streets here." That's a lie. The study was clearly conducted on students currently registered in school that have no 'permanent' residence. They're staying in foster homes, the homes of relatives, motels, or transitional homes waiting for foster homes. They are not starving in the streets. And yes, there are some children living with their displaced parent in abandoned buildings or in their mobile home or even their car. But there is no way in hell that all 2.5 million are without a roof over their heads or starving as you claimed. Good try though comrade, keep trying.

Screenshot-2019-05-16-Federal-data-summary-School-Years-2014-15.png

So you're digging for semantics instead of just looking at numbers..? Great, I expected as much. Yet I'm still just as disappointed.
 
So you're digging for semantics instead of just looking at numbers..? Great, I expected as much. Yet I'm still just as disappointed.

No comrade, I just buried you neck deep in factual information.
 
Back
Top Bottom