I finally finished reading the whole thing. The level of detail is impressive, they really searched hard for evidence of conspiracy and coordination (not collusion) with Russians to interfere with the election. There were many interactions with Russians who sought to interfere with the election, but Mueller couldn't make the case. He found shared aims, benefits to Trump's campaign, and cooperation -just nothing showing this "meeting of the minds" in some agreement to interfere. Ultimately Trump is right, there's no evidence of collusion at a level that could show coordination or conspiracy.
There are 20 full pages of blacked-out redaction that deal with Russian interference, but apparently this all refers to "ongoing matter" and cannot be disclosed. Mueller does identify 2 areas of Russian election interference; the Hillary email/DNC/Podesta hacking and leaks, and use of social media to stir things up. He concludes noting the sophistication, extensiveness, depth and effectiveness of the Russian interference, but with all that redaction it is hard to verify any of this. On the hacking I'm dubious because I've seen it reported the DNC material was downloaded at a rate inconsistent with remote hacking, and that telltale indicia in the Gucifer material features 'cartoonish' Russian references that suggest these were intentional "clues" to mislead.
The obstruction still seems rather vague and subjective, Mueller just couldn't satisfactorily show intent and he says so. Evidently he applies a criminal justice standard of proof, but for an impeachment there is not such stricture, I'm sure the Democrats could make a credible case, though it would be full of speculation, suggestion, inuendo, inference and implication. The Democrats know the quality of their claim and they know it just won't get the votes from the Senate, so if they held their impeachment proceeding and went on with all that speculation, they wouldn't look very good.
The Report is dense, there are a lot of participants, incidents taking place at different times, connections between different parties. If there was a conspiracy we could infer awareness of what these participants were doing to others and their coordination, I'm still reviewing timelines and interactions trying to figure this out, but I expect Mueller and his investigators already have done this, and we know his conclusion.
I think this is over, he didn't find that smoking gun.
