• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Attorney General William Barr testifies before Congress

The report that Barr needs to release to the public is the one that Mueller’s team created for public consumption and which Barr has been sitting on for the last two weeks. Then he needs to release the full unredacted version to HJC. He can take his own redacted version and shove it up his ass.

So he should ignore the law? Grand Jury, sources and methods, ongoing investigations, and those not under prosecution, should all be exposed and the law regarding these areas should all be ignored?
That's sure different from what democrats wanted in regard to the FISA warrant applications when republicans asked for that un-redacted information. As Barr told the committee, "if the committee chair feels he needs this information he can pursue its release through the courts, as is his right".
 
Good luck with that...

Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk

The position I stated is one I'm not alone in having. Since the Barr Report exonerating (without exonerating) the President came out, Trump's approval rose .1 point to 43.3%. This is 1.3 points below his ceiling. In other words, the only people who believe that Trump was exonerated was his own base. These are the people who never required any exoneration to begin with, and frankly wouldn't have cared if the report had entirely condemned him.

The point of this is that if Barr continues to cover up for Trump, the public (trump supporters don't count) will go into 2020 believing that the President engaged in a massive coverup to protect himself from the negative results of an investigation.
 
I don't remember Loretta Lynch working with Barr to create a redacted report of the clinton investigation....nope....they just redacted it by themselves

A DECLASSIFIED FBI report on the Hillary Email Scandal. Hmmm, in retrospect....you should have called for its full release, no redacts, right? View attachment 67254507

Come on now you know justice only works one way for the democrats, their way. They are all about protecting their own and them get righteous when it concerns republicans.
 
So he should ignore the law?

Your argument is moot. Mueller prepared a report just for the public. Barr didn't tell anybody about that report and has been sitting on it since.

Barr is a goon.
 
The position I stated is one I'm not alone in having. Since the Barr Report exonerating (without exonerating) the President came out, Trump's approval rose .1 point to 43.3%. This is 1.3 points below his ceiling. In other words, the only people who believe that Trump was exonerated was his own base. These are the people who never required any exoneration to begin with, and frankly wouldn't have cared if the report had entirely condemned him.

The point of this is that if Barr continues to cover up for Trump, the public (trump supporters don't count) will go into 2020 believing that the President engaged in a massive coverup to protect himself from the negative results of an investigation.

You had your investigation by the guy the democrats wanted, No Collusion and no charges for Obstruction. You are not happy. You cannot accept the conclusion of the Mueller investigation. You say Barr is coving up for the President? He has stated he will be happy to testify before the committee after the release of the Mueller Report. Did you make the same claim of a cover-up when Comey gave his speech about Hillary be "extremely careless" concerning her emails? Did you claim a cover -up when the language of Comey's statement was revealed to have been changed from gross neglegence in order to protect Hillary? Did you question why Comey wrote his exoneration letter of Hillary before he interviewed her? Did you question why most all of Hillary's staff were granted immunity? Did you ask why Hillary was interviewed with some of her staff and her lawyers present and without being sworn under oath? I bet you did not.
 
Your argument is moot. Mueller prepared a report just for the public. Barr didn't tell anybody about that report and has been sitting on it since.

Barr is a goon.

You are either ignorant of facts or a great troll.
 
The report that Barr needs to release to the public is the one that Mueller’s team created for public consumption and which Barr has been sitting on for the last two weeks. Then he needs to release the full unredacted version to HJC. He can take his own redacted version and shove it up his ass.

sorry that is against the law. You cannot legally publish classified material.
you should know this by now.
 
You cannot accept the conclusion of the Mueller investigation.

Nobody has seen the Mueller report. Barr is sitting on the version Mueller crafted for public viewing.
 
What does that have to do with anything I said?

I expect to see Muellers edited version that was meant for public release, like two weeks ago.

The house and Senate should have received the unredacted version at the same time Barr did.

that is not how the law works.
you have been told this like 1000000 times.
yet you refuse to educate yourself on the process.

you do this to either remain uninformed or to continue the ability to come up with
these already proven false arguments.
so which is it?

The hold up by Barr makes it clear that there may not be criminal charges filed against trump, however it seems they still want to hide the report.

No one is hiding anything Barr is legally not allowed to release classified material. Mueller is working with Barr on what stuff must be redacted by law.

I suspect it will be so damning that Democrats have no choice but to impeach...

Muellers summary cleared trump of any wrong doing.
and the DOJ cleared him of any obstruction charges.

there is nothing the leftist clowns can do unless you believe punishing an innocent man.
 
sorry that is against the law. You cannot legally publish classified material.
you should know this by now.

This isn't the Starr Report. Nobody said anything about publishing the entire report.
 
Was the unredacted version kept from a bipartisan Congressional committee?

Hillary Clinton email controversy - Wikipedia
Here's a nice recap of the Hillary investigations. Yes, seems the majority of the Hillary information was redacted and the redacted copy was the one provided to committee. This is why the republicans have fought for so many files not yet released. Take your time and read it all.
 
Hillary Clinton email controversy - Wikipedia
Here's a nice recap of the Hillary investigations. Yes, seems the majority of the Hillary information was redacted and the redacted copy was the one provided to committee. This is why the republicans have fought for so many files not yet released. Take your time and read it all.

Why did Republicans fight for so many files not yet released?
 
I wouldn't know that for that specific report, I do know that the House oversight committee requested many documents which the FBI fought to keep hidden.

House Oversight subpoenas FBI for Clinton investigation documents | TheHill

And this is what I was getting at. When Republicans say that Barr doesn't need to release an unredacted report because "nothing will be good enough for Democrats," what they were doing was projecting, because nothing was good enough for Republicans when the Clinton investigation report came out.
 
The report that Barr needs to release to the public is the one that Mueller’s team created for public consumption and which Barr has been sitting on for the last two weeks. Then he needs to release the full unredacted version to HJC. He can take his own redacted version and shove it up his ass.
Mueller DIDN'T create one for public consumption - He was directed by AG to investigate and report back to AG.
 
Mueller DIDN'T create one for public consumption - He was directed by AG to investigate and report back to AG.

False.

Some members of the office were particularly disappointed that Barr did not release summary information the special counsel team had prepared, according to two people familiar with their reactions.

“There was immediate displeasure from the team when they saw how the attorney general had characterized their work instead,” according to one U.S. official briefed on the matter.

Summaries were prepared for different sections of the report, with a view that they could be made public, the official said.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.e2deab6f99cf

You probably didn't know about the public version of the report because Barr didn't tell anybody about it and sat on it. He's sitting on it even now.
 
The report that Barr needs to release to the public is the one that Mueller’s team created for public consumption and which Barr has been sitting on for the last two weeks. Then he needs to release the full unredacted version to HJC. He can take his own redacted version and shove it up his ass.

How do you know that exists?
 
Paywall. Is that intentional?

Yes, I'm aware that paywalls consistently and exclusively target trump supporters.

Before it was "Fake nooz!" Now it's "Pay wall!"
 
Back
Top Bottom