Investigations will continue despite submission of the Mueller report

Cramer · Mar 25, 2019

TamleeB said:
I believe it is a mistake for the Democratic party committee to further investigate this matter. I believe Mueller and his team were given the time and the resources needed to fully investigate. The investigation is complete. They found NO Trump/Russia collusion. It is time to move on and take on the many serious issues faced by our Country. I believe if the Dems insist on more investigations it is going to hurt them dearly in 2020.

As I stated, I agree the democrats should not do committee investigations.

Do you agree the other agencies that the Mueller referred other possible crimes, continue to be investigated by the Justice Department?

TamleeB · Mar 25, 2019

Cramer said:
As I stated, I agree the democrats should not do committee investigations.

Do you agree the other agencies that the Mueller referred other possible crimes, continue to be investigated by the Justice Department?

The Mueller investigation has been completed. No evidence of Trump/Russia collusion was found. I do not believe that there should be more investigations into THIS particular matter. I have absolutely no doubt that there will indeed be more investigations ahead which I believe is a mistake on the part of the Dems. Honestly, I have a feeling that will hand Trump another victory in 2020.

Cramer · Mar 25, 2019

TamleeB said:
The Mueller investigation has been completed. No evidence of Trump/Russia collusion was found. I do not believe that there should be more investigations into THIS particular matter. I have absolutely no doubt that there will indeed be more investigations ahead which I believe is a mistake on the part of the Dems. Honestly, I have a feeling that will hand Trump another victory in 2020.

Why do you keep dancing about the current ongoing and referred to investigations that are being conducted by the Justice Dept. (NOT the democrats).

Do you want the truth and facts?

That is all I am after.

Do you think using campaign funds to bribe an individual to keep silent about a damaging event that occurred with a POTUS candidate, during the campaign, should be investigated? It allegedly happen, twice. Do you want to know the truth?

TamleeB · Mar 25, 2019

Cramer said:
Why do you keep dancing about the current ongoing and referred to investigations that are being conducted by the Justice Dept. (NOT the democrats).

Do you want the truth and facts?

That is all I am after.

Do you think using campaign funds to bribe an individual to keep silent about a damaging event that occurred with a POTUS candidate, during the campaign, should be investigated? It allegedly happen, twice. Do you want to know the truth?

I am not dancing around anything. I want the truth and facts. Right now the facts show that there was NO collusion. Time to admit there were false claims made, not backed up by fact. By all means allow the JD to continue onward with other investigations. IF funds from the campaign were used illegally then I am sure it will be proven and charges will be pending. I am all for seeing evidence. Let out the FISA warrant information. Now that the Mueller investigation has been completed and there was no evidence of Trump/Russia collusion I believe we should all see what started that ball rolling. Transparency by all would be helpful.

Cramer · Mar 25, 2019

TamleeB said:
I am not dancing around anything. I want the truth and facts. Right now the facts show that there was NO collusion. Time to admit there were false claims made, not backed up by fact. By all means allow the JD to continue onward with other investigations. IF funds from the campaign were used illegally then I am sure it will be proven and charges will be pending. I am all for seeing evidence. Let out the FISA warrant information. Now that the Mueller investigation has been completed and there was no evidence of Trump/Russia collusion I believe we should all see what started that ball rolling. Transparency by all would be helpful.

That is not what the summary said.

The report did not have enough evidence to indict. Trump, according to the report, was not exonerated. This is another case, like Clinton, people with means, influence and wealth get treated differently. If this were you or me, we most likely would have had to settle for a plea deal.

TU Curmudgeon · Mar 25, 2019

Cramer said:
Why do you keep dancing about the current ongoing and referred to investigations that are being conducted by the Justice Dept. (NOT the democrats).

Do you want the truth and facts?

That is all I am after.

Do you think using campaign funds to bribe an individual to keep silent about a damaging event that occurred with a POTUS candidate, during the campaign, should be investigated? It allegedly happen, twice. Do you want to know the truth?

Any person whose vote would be swayed simply because a candidate had consensual sexual relations with someone probably shouldn't be given a day pass from "The Home" so that they could vote.

Cramer · Mar 25, 2019

TU Curmudgeon said:
Any person whose vote would be swayed simply because a candidate had consensual sexual relations with someone probably shouldn't be given a day pass from "The Home" so that they could vote.

What happen to that moral majority?

With that mind frame, candidates in the future should be honest about their extra marital affairs, instead of bribing their mistresses to keep quiet.

Or, we could just mimic France, and give a pass to those type of situations.

The hatred for HRC, was more of a factor of Trump getting elected, than people really wanting Trump as POTUS. Most did not think he would get elected. Many, (but not enough) regret their vote.

TamleeB · Mar 25, 2019

Cramer said:
That is not what the summary said.

The report did not have enough evidence to indict. Trump, according to the report, was not exonerated. This is another case, like Clinton, people with means, influence and wealth get treated differently. If this were you or me, we most likely would have had to settle for a plea deal.

"Did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated" with Russia. There was NO Trump/Russian collusion. Those are the facts.

PeteEU · Mar 25, 2019

TamleeB said:
"Did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated" with Russia. There was NO Trump/Russian collusion. Those are the facts.

Err problem is we already know that is not true. Manfort clearly worked for the Russians and was part of the Trump campaign. Others have been busted for lying about links.

No what we have is Barrs views of what the report says and hence we need the report it self to filter out the clear pro Trump bias that Barr has...it is after all why he got the job in the first place.

Sent from my Honor 8X using Tapatalk

Cramer · Mar 25, 2019

TamleeB said:
"Did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated" with Russia. There was NO Trump/Russian collusion. Those are the facts.

The Special Counsel states that while this report does not conclude that
the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.

From the summary.

TamleeB · Mar 25, 2019

PeteEU said:
Err problem is we already know that is not true. Manfort clearly worked for the Russians and was part of the Trump campaign. Others have been busted for lying about links.

No what we have is Barrs views of what the report says and hence we need the report it self to filter out the clear pro Trump bias that Barr has...it is after all why he got the job in the first place.

Sent from my Honor 8X using Tapatalk

I am for having the report released. But I also realize there will be parts that cannot legally be released. In the end it will not matter as its my belief that there is an unwillingness by some to ever accept the findings. That is their right, but it will not change the fact that Mueller "did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated" with Russia.

KLATTU · Mar 25, 2019

PeteEU said:
Err problem is we already know that is not true. Manfort clearly worked for the Russians and was part of the Trump campaign. Others have been busted for lying about links.

No what we have is Barrs views of what the report says and hence we need the report it self to filter out the clear pro Trump bias that Barr has...it is after all why he got the job in the first place.

Sent from my Honor 8X using Tapatalk

LAFFRIOT.

Boy you liberals jut won't give it up, will you?

Face it, you got played.

Go wipe the egg off your face,

j-mac · Mar 25, 2019

Cramer said:
Key word: Believe.

You believe, without proof. All of those were investigated, and no indictments, no convictions.

I am no fan of HRC...if she is dirty....throw the book at her.

But apparently, there was no there, there.

SMH....

Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk

j-mac · Mar 25, 2019

Cramer said:
Do you think using campaign funds to bribe an individual to keep silent about a damaging event that occurred with a POTUS candidate, during the campaign, should be investigated? It allegedly happen, twice. Do you want to know the truth?

If that were the case then sure, but that's NOT what happened, and even if it were he can pay a fine like Obama did.

Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk

j-mac · Mar 25, 2019

PeteEU said:
Err problem is we already know that is not true. Manfort clearly worked for the Russians and was part of the Trump campaign. Others have been busted for lying about links.

No what we have is Barrs views of what the report says and hence we need the report it self to filter out the clear pro Trump bias that Barr has...it is after all why he got the job in the first place.

Sent from my Honor 8X using Tapatalk

Rosenstein also contributed on that summary bud....

Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk

JustHanging · Mar 25, 2019

Mongidig said:
The "Never Trump" movements continues. It's not only a great expense as far as money. This has been a two year distraction for the President who is dealing with major world issues. Those in government who have spent their time going after Trump and not doing what they were elected to do should be voted out of office! They have put this country at risk for their own potential benefit.

I know right? Whatever happened to the good old days? When we could attack a black POTUS because he used Dijon mustard? Now there's a real crime, never mind that numerous top members of his staff weren't indicted, convicted, and pled guilty.

Cramer · Mar 25, 2019

j-mac said:
If that were the case then sure, but that's NOT what happened, and even if it were he can pay a fine like Obama did.

Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk

Sorry...but it is obvious you live in a different reality.

Stay in your safe place!

j-mac · Mar 25, 2019

Cramer said:
Sorry...but it is obvious you live in a different reality.

Stay in your safe place!

Different reality from liberals? You bet. And thank God for that....

Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk

Cramer · Mar 25, 2019

j-mac said:
Different reality from liberals? You bet. And thank God for that....

Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk

No.

Different reality that includes facts, supported by empirical evidence, vs emotions and/or 1000+ year old fables and myths.

jmotivator · Mar 25, 2019

PeteEU said:
Err problem is we already know that is not true. Manfort clearly worked for the Russians and was part of the Trump campaign. Others have been busted for lying about links.

No what we have is Barrs views of what the report says and hence we need the report it self to filter out the clear pro Trump bias that Barr has...it is after all why he got the job in the first place.

Manafort worked for the Russians long before joining the Trump campaign for 4 months, and worked with them as part of a job he was doing with the Podesta Group. He was not convicted of any crimes that Trump could have ordered or would have known anything about.

JustHanging · Mar 25, 2019

KLATTU said:
LAFFRIOT.

Boy you liberals jut won't give it up, will you?

Face it, you got played.

Go wipe the egg off your face,

This from the side that attacked the POTUS because of the colour of his skin? Saying he wasn't American, but born in Kenya? That he was a secret Muslim (terrorist)? And then chose the man who led this racist attack as their leader?

Now after an investigation where numerous Trump top officials are indicted, convicted, or plead guilty, you say there is egg on the left's face?

The blatant racism of much of the Trump base is on clear display.

The only people with egg on their face are the racists who support this behavior.

PeteEU · Mar 25, 2019

j-mac said:
Rosenstein also contributed on that summary bud....

Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk

So they say.....The Trump administration also said that it was one of the largest crowds at the inaguration.. and other bull****.

PeteEU · Mar 25, 2019

KLATTU said:
LAFFRIOT.

Boy you liberals jut won't give it up, will you?

Face it, you got played.

Go wipe the egg off your face,

I aint a "liberal" in the American sense of the word. And you are the ones being played by Trump and his criminal family and friends.

KLATTU · Mar 25, 2019

JustHanging said:
This from the side that attacked the POTUS because of the colour of his skin? vior.

blah blah blah....race card race card.

Well now that RUSSIA! MUELLER!RUSSIA! MUELLER!RUSSIA! MUELLER!RUSSIA! MUELLER!RUSSIA! MUELLER!RUSSIA! MUELLER!RUSSIA! MUELLER!RUSSIA! MUELLER!RUSSIA! MUELLER!

is off the table, guess it back to that old saw,

#PLAYED

PeteEU · Mar 25, 2019

TamleeB said:
I am for having the report released. But I also realize there will be parts that cannot legally be released. In the end it will not matter as its my belief that there is an unwillingness by some to ever accept the findings. That is their right,

If there are parts that can't be legally released, then that means that there are illegalities involved and at least Congress has to be informed. There is no such thing as privacy when it comes to the President of the US, as established by the Ken Starr witch hunt against Clinton.

but it will not change the fact that Mueller "did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated" with Russia.

That is what Barr wrote, not what Mueller wrote. That is why we need the report it self to know exactly how Mueller and his team have phrased the conclusions and the evidence to back it up and what avenues that they could not, would not or worse.. were discouraged to go down. Like why was Trump never interviewed?

We have seen GOP cherry picking of official reports before and their ability to manipulate such data. They did it under Bush Jr constantly and have been doing it under Trump.

Investigations will continue despite submission of the Mueller report

Cramer

TamleeB

Cramer

TamleeB

Cramer

TU Curmudgeon

B.A. (Sarc), LLb. (Lex Sarcasus), PhD (Sarc.)

Cramer

TamleeB

PeteEU

Cramer

TamleeB

KLATTU

j-mac

j-mac

j-mac

JustHanging

Cramer

j-mac

Cramer

jmotivator

Computer Gaming Nerd

JustHanging

PeteEU

PeteEU

KLATTU

Attachments

PeteEU