• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

House Judiciary Republican releases transcript of ex-FBI agent Strzok's testimony

Don't kid yourself. Trump had everything to do the revocation of Strzok's security clearance. After all his son in law Jared needed one. So he probably just said; "Here you go. Take his.
And of course you have proof of this? I don't know why I even ask you. You rarely have proof of your inane babbling. OK 1. 2. 3. Start spinning! :lol:
 
Notice how conservatives and Congressional Republicans haven't said a word about Lisa Page after her testimony was released? The 'blockbuster' Lisa page testimony landed with a thud for the conservatives again. After two years of hysterical shrieking about 'deep state conspiracies' and all they have found to date is one FBI agent texting his personal opinions about the president on a work phone.
.


????? It confirmed that the DOJ directed the FBI to NOT prosecute Hillary. All while Lorretta was claiming that she would defer to the FBI's decision and James Comey pretending as if his decision wasnt already made for him. . ACTUAL obstruction of justice.
 
And of course you have proof of this? I don't know why I even ask you. You rarely have proof of your inane babbling. OK 1. 2. 3. Start spinning! :lol:

I don't why bother to entertain the requests of someone who repeatedly demonstrates that he has barely grade school level reading comprehension skills. In other words the perfect candidate for membership in Trump's beloved base. But here you go.

Trump'''s list: Those who might lose their security clearance

"Trump's list: Those who might lose their security clearance"

President Donald Trump has acted on a threat to revoke the security clearance of former CIA Director John Brennan, citing a constitutional responsibility to protect classified information. Brennan, who served in the Obama administration, had become an increasingly sharp critic of Trump’s.

Trump says he is reviewing security clearances for nine other individuals. Some have been publicly critical of the president, while others are linked to special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian election interference, which Trump calls “a witch hunt.”

A look at the 10 individuals:.....

PETER STRZOK

The longtime FBI agent was recently fired from the bureau, his lawyer said this week. Strzok had worked on the Mueller investigation but was removed after anti-Trump text messages that Strzok exchanged with an FBI lawyer became public. Trump has used the text messages to buttress his claims that the FBI is biased against him.

Strzok’s lawyer, Aitan Goelman, said in a statement Wednesday that security clearances shouldn’t be taken away as a means of “punishing people who have criticized the President, or coercing others into silence.” He said by stripping Brennan’s clearance and threatening others with the same fate, “the President has taken us down one more step on the path toward authoritarianism.”

So let it be written. So let it be done. All hail King Trump! Long live the King!
 
????? It confirmed that the DOJ directed the FBI to NOT prosecute Hillary. All while Lorretta was claiming that she would defer to the FBI's decision and James Comey pretending as if his decision wasnt already made for him. . ACTUAL obstruction of justice.

Not accurate. What she said was that she would defer to the judgement of career prosecutors/lawyers and FBI agents
 
Not accurate. What she said was that she would defer to the judgement of career prosecutors/lawyers and FBI agents

But she didnt. The Justice department informed the FBI that they wouldnt be prosecuting Hillary. Thats why Comey was writing her exoneration before the investigation had been completed.
 
No, because of allegations against Strzok, the entire transcript should be revealed out of fairness to Strzok. Also, that of Page and Orr, as well.
I spoke to his inclusion of the Mueller report. By law it is a confidential report, so no.


Yes you are. Thank you for admitting that.
 
Back
Top Bottom