Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 80

Thread: House Judiciary Republican releases transcript of ex-FBI agent Strzok's testimony

  1. #11
    Sage
    Excon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Last Seen
    03-15-19 @ 09:12 PM
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    35,521

    Re: House Judiciary Republican releases transcript of ex-FBI agent Strzok's testimony

    Quote Originally Posted by MauiMan View Post
    Is this a legal argument or simply your opinion?
    Really?
    Legal opinion - Barr doesn't have to release it unless he wants to.
    Factual - Barr doesn't have to release it unless he wants to.

    See any difference?

    So tell me, why would you want anything else not related to criminal activity released?


    Barr has stated he will release the Report's conclusions. Be happy with that and move on.
    “The law is reason, free from passion.”
    Aristotle
    (≚ᄌ≚)

  2. #12
    Educator MauiMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Washington, Minnesota, Hawaii
    Last Seen
    Today @ 02:48 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Left
    Posts
    738

    Re: House Judiciary Republican releases transcript of ex-FBI agent Strzok's testimony

    Quote Originally Posted by Excon View Post
    Really?
    Legal opinion - Barr doesn't have to release it unless he wants to.
    Factual - Barr doesn't have to release it unless he wants to.

    See any difference?

    So tell me, why would you want anything else not related to criminal activity released?


    Barr has stated he will release the Report's conclusions. Be happy with that and move on.
    Since it is Barr’s choice, it is simply your opinion, then. Why is that so difficult for you to admit?
    “Donald Trump was the dumbest goddam student I ever had.” — Professor William T. Kelley, Wharton School of Business. (Emphasis is Dr. Kelley’s)

  3. #13
    Sage
    Excon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Last Seen
    03-15-19 @ 09:12 PM
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    35,521

    Re: House Judiciary Republican releases transcript of ex-FBI agent Strzok's testimony

    Quote Originally Posted by MauiMan View Post
    Since it is Barr’s choice, it is simply your opinion, then. Why is that so difficult for you to admit?
    Admit? WTF?
    What did you not understand about what was said?

    Again.
    Legal opinion - Barr doesn't have to release it unless he wants to.
    Factual - Barr doesn't have to release it unless he wants to.

    See any difference?

    Do you really not understand that means you are not entitled to such information?
    “The law is reason, free from passion.”
    Aristotle
    (≚ᄌ≚)

  4. #14
    Educator MauiMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Washington, Minnesota, Hawaii
    Last Seen
    Today @ 02:48 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Left
    Posts
    738

    Re: House Judiciary Republican releases transcript of ex-FBI agent Strzok's testimony

    Quote Originally Posted by Excon View Post
    Admit? WTF?
    What did you not understand about what was said?

    Again.
    Legal opinion - Barr doesn't have to release it unless he wants to.
    Factual - Barr doesn't have to release it unless he wants to.

    See any difference?

    Do you really not understand that means you are not entitled to such information?
    Whether or not I am entitled to the information doesn’t matter. Nor does your opinion matter on what information is released. The only thing that matters is what Barr chooses to release. Are you understanding yet?
    “Donald Trump was the dumbest goddam student I ever had.” — Professor William T. Kelley, Wharton School of Business. (Emphasis is Dr. Kelley’s)

  5. #15
    Sage
    Excon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Last Seen
    03-15-19 @ 09:12 PM
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    35,521

    Re: House Judiciary Republican releases transcript of ex-FBI agent Strzok's testimony

    Quote Originally Posted by MauiMan View Post
    Whether or not I am entitled to the information doesn’t matter. Nor does your opinion matter on what information is released. The only thing that matters is what Barr chooses to release. Are you understanding yet?
    And again you show you do not understand.
    Figures.

    Again; From the beginning.
    No. The public only needs to see information as to whether a crime was committed. Nothing more.

    You asked why? I gave you your answer.
    You are not entitled to it.
    It was not just a factual statement but a legal one as well. Which is what you also asked.
    Capice?
    “The law is reason, free from passion.”
    Aristotle
    (≚ᄌ≚)

  6. #16
    Educator MauiMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Washington, Minnesota, Hawaii
    Last Seen
    Today @ 02:48 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Left
    Posts
    738

    Re: House Judiciary Republican releases transcript of ex-FBI agent Strzok's testimony

    Quote Originally Posted by Excon View Post
    And again you show you do not understand.
    Figures.

    Again; From the beginning.
    No. The public only needs to see information as to whether a crime was committed. Nothing more.

    You asked why? I gave you your answer.
    You are not entitled to it.
    It was not just a factual statement but a legal one as well. Which is what you also asked.
    Capice?
    And, again, it’s just your opinion. Your logic is flawed in that you have no argument. What the public sees will be based upon what Barr decides—and he has wide discretion.

    Here’s what you’ve done so far:

    1) You’ve tried to attack my character, which proves nothing of your statement, and is an ad hominem logic flaw. Make sense?

    2) You have no idea what Barr will decide, because you are not him. You are concluding that he will only release information to the public as to whether a crime was committed. But, you do not know that he will do this. It is possible that he will do that, but you cannot conclude that he will. Do you now understand the flaw in your logic? You have only stated an opinion, and not a fact.
    “Donald Trump was the dumbest goddam student I ever had.” — Professor William T. Kelley, Wharton School of Business. (Emphasis is Dr. Kelley’s)

  7. #17
    Guru

    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Last Seen
    Today @ 11:51 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    3,933

    Re: House Judiciary Republican releases transcript of ex-FBI agent Strzok's testimony

    Quote Originally Posted by Excon View Post
    No. The public only needs to see information as to whether a crime was committed. Nothing more.
    Or one can adopt the Swedish position: that the public should only be given such information that their betters - ie the political, legal and media elites - think is good for them.

  8. #18
    Educator MauiMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Washington, Minnesota, Hawaii
    Last Seen
    Today @ 02:48 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Left
    Posts
    738

    Re: House Judiciary Republican releases transcript of ex-FBI agent Strzok's testimony

    Quote Originally Posted by Sweden View Post
    Or one can adopt the Swedish position: that the public should only be given such information that their betters - ie the political, legal and media elites - think is good for them.
    Is that really the Swedish position? Ar du svenska? What do you know about the Swedish position?
    “Donald Trump was the dumbest goddam student I ever had.” — Professor William T. Kelley, Wharton School of Business. (Emphasis is Dr. Kelley’s)

  9. #19
    Sage
    Excon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Last Seen
    03-15-19 @ 09:12 PM
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    35,521

    Re: House Judiciary Republican releases transcript of ex-FBI agent Strzok's testimony

    Quote Originally Posted by MauiMan View Post
    And, again, it’s just your opinion. Your logic is flawed in that you have no argument. What the public sees will be based upon what Barr decides—and he has wide discretion.

    Here’s what you’ve done so far:

    1) You’ve tried to attack my character, which proves nothing of your statement, and is an ad hominem logic flaw. Make sense?

    2) You have no idea what Barr will decide, because you are not him. You are concluding that he will only release information to the public as to whether a crime was committed. But, you do not know that he will do this. It is possible that he will do that, but you cannot conclude that he will. Do you now understand the flaw in your logic? You have only stated an opinion, and not a fact.
    You are way off in the deep end here and again show you do not understand.
    1. Legally - you are not entitled. Period.
    2. Factually - you are not entitled. Period.

    There is no difference between those two. What Mueller decides to do is irrelevant to that. Do you really not understand that?

    To that which I have emboldened and colored in the quote. That is what I have been telling you and you still do not understand the significance of it.

    To your numbered items.
    1. Attack your character? WTF? Get a grip and stop projecting. You are the only one damaging your character with your absurd posts.
    2. I have not concluded anything. He said he would release the reports conclusions. Do you not understand the terminology of; "He said"?
    The only one with flawed logic is you and it is causing you to be unable to understand exactly what has been said.
    “The law is reason, free from passion.”
    Aristotle
    (≚ᄌ≚)

  10. #20
    Guru

    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Last Seen
    Today @ 11:51 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    3,933

    Re: House Judiciary Republican releases transcript of ex-FBI agent Strzok's testimony

    Quote Originally Posted by MauiMan View Post
    Is that really the Swedish position? Ar du svenska? What do you know about the Swedish position?
    Ja, jag är svensk. (You are obviously not as 'svenska' is the plural adjective). And I live in Sweden (to revert to English before the mods are on to me for posting in a dreaded foreign language). So I am able to bore you are great length with all the reasons why I think the aim of Swedish MSM is to only let the public know what it deems good for them.. Btw are you aware that the Swedish state TV and radio broadcasters, STV and Sveriges Radio, are now funded directly from taxation?

Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •