• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump suggests that it could get 'very bad' if military, police, biker supporters play 'tough'

Didn't read post 280, did you? that is exactly why it is waste of time dealing with you and others who always demand links but then never reads them

I read it. The article didn't name any particular regulation, it just declared they were more burdensome than other states.
 
What are you babbling about? I've never spoken "tough" on here.



I'm always polite and respectful. But I do speak the truth, which seems to get some people, particularly those who support racists, quite upset. Some even post crap accusing me of doing things I don't go. Go figure.

Sure....keep telling yourself that....
 
LOL, can you explain why builders then aren't building homes in California, where is the incentive since the population is so great so that apparently isn't it. the article in Post 280 insinuates the lack of incentive and since it isn't population it has to be the high cost of regulations including EPA

I can't give you an opinion on removing a particular regulation if you don't identify one. "There should be fewer burdensome regulations" is a fine sentiment that I agree with. So tell me which regulations are bad.
 
I read it. The article didn't name any particular regulation, it just declared they were more burdensome than other states.

So....because they didn't name them specifically, they aren't burdensome or don't exsist?
 
Nope. We already have the violence...and it's coming from the left.

Trump is simply saying that violence won't be tolerated forever.

What is the body count from violent Americans on the Left so far?

You can't pretty this up, the President of the United States is telling police, military and violent biker gangs to attack his critics on the Left.
 
So....because they didn't name them specifically, they aren't burdensome or don't exsist?

I cannot assess the impact of a particular regulation if you don't identify it. The generalized concept of removing regulations when they cost a lot and have little or no positive impact is a good one. I agree wholeheartedly.

So tell me which regulations you think are causing the biggest problems.
 
Sure....keep telling yourself that....

Well prove me wrong, find one quote from me where I'm being an "internet tough guy". We both you know you can't. You're lying and making things up about me because you don't like what I say.

So prove me wrong, and that you weren't lying about me, and find that quote. I'll apologize if you do, because I take responsibility for my actions.
 
What is the body count from violent Americans on the Left so far?

You can't pretty this up, the President of the United States is telling police, military and violent biker gangs to attack his critics on the Left.

Are you serious, not even CLOSE to what he said.....are you deranged?
 



Quote from Wilkerson. When Trump calls his minions to the streets the institutions of this country are going to rip his guts out. If not he's moving to New Zeeland.
 
So what are they going to do? Ram their cars into a crowd of lefty protesters?

Or maybe, hit people in the head with bicycle locks? Shoot up a ballfield?
 
What is the body count from violent Americans on the Left?

No idea, but you honestly literally said the President asked people to attack his critics, and that's so far from the truth, it's pathetic.
 
I can't give you an opinion on removing a particular regulation if you don't identify one. "There should be fewer burdensome regulations" is a fine sentiment that I agree with. So tell me which regulations are bad.

Read the article, why aren't builders building in California with such great demand?? Post 280
 
Read the article, why aren't builders building in California with such great demand?? Post 280

I read it. It didn't identify a specific regulation. I can agree with the concept of removing overly burdensome regulations. So, show me one. Just ****in one, is all I ask.
 
Trump and his supporters made a career by trolling a president for years and consistently about his birth certificate. It is part of the job to be a president to act like an adult instead of acting like a "master troll."

So it would be better if the president acted like you, a socialist?
 
I read it. It didn't identify a specific regulation. I can agree with the concept of removing overly burdensome regulations. So, show me one. Just ****in one, is all I ask.

Why isn't the fact that builders aren't building in California even with the high demand not good enough for you? I am not a builder and don't live in California but the article I posted cited EPA regulations and others as not providing the incentive to build the home necessary to meet the demand
 
Why isn't the fact that builders aren't building in California even with the high demand not good enough for you? I am not a builder and don't live in California but the article I posted cited EPA regulations and others as not providing the incentive to build the home necessary to meet the demand

Because without knowing what the regulation is, you can't make a judgement call if it's necessary,

It's a solid question to ask,

IMO most of the regulations are crap......but I don't like CALI to begin with, there's a reason I moved from there.
 
Ready to oppose this asshole trump and his MAGA Hat wearing Maggots...I dare them to wear them in Blue State America

How will you oppose them?
 
Why isn't the fact that builders aren't building in California even with the high demand not good enough for you?

Have you considered the possibilities that
1) Other factors may actually exist
2) The housing shortage there probably results from many factors

You are just saying "there's not enough houses, therefore regulation is overly burdensome."
 
Have you considered the possibilities that
1) Other factors may actually exist
2) The housing shortage there probably results from many factors

Of course other factors exist, but that doesn't mean regulations are not a big factor in it.

Land use, but also, what good is it building a house that's going to cost 500K when the people you are building it for, can't buy it.
 
I don't support Trump. I voted for Gary Johnson. Trump is crap. And no, I wouldn't take up arms against a fellow American for any reason whatsoever. I would only defend myself if I had to.

Bravo!
 
Of course other factors exist, but that doesn't mean regulations are not a big factor in it.

Land use, but also, what good is it building a house that's going to cost 500K when the people you are building it for, can't buy it.

Ok great. So what do you want to do about it? Presumably remove or change overly-burdensome regulations, right?
 
Because without knowing what the regulation is, you can't make a judgement call if it's necessary,

It's a solid question to ask,

IMO most of the regulations are crap......but I don't like CALI to begin with, there's a reason I moved from there.

I don't think it is relevant to me to answer that question but what is relevant is that builders aren't building in California and that defies logic and common sense with the demand. Something is preventing them from building and the article says regulations
 
Back
Top Bottom