• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump suggests that it could get 'very bad' if military, police, biker supporters play 'tough'

True, so would I. But as a conservative and possible supporter of Trump and a gun owner, would you take up those arms against fellow Americans if Trump called for it?

I don't support Trump. I voted for Gary Johnson. Trump is crap. And no, I wouldn't take up arms against a fellow American for any reason whatsoever. I would only defend myself if I had to.
 
I don't hate anybody. But I'm sure I can find a wall to beat my head against that won't give me the headache you do. BYE! :2wave:

This is a debate forum and personal opinions will never win a debate or a court case. You offer nothing but your own opinion supported by others here but never posting data to support your claims. NATO is stronger today because member nations are living up to their payment agreement, The U.S. economy is booming whereas foreign economies aren't, Europe is over run by radical Islamic fundamentalists and this country is stronger than any time during the Obama term. There is a reason the military, first responders, and law abiding citizens support Trump. Anyone that violates U.S. law on things like immigration, sanctuary cities, and promotes open borders is clueless and a radical that has no credibility. Abortion on demand is another issue that isn't supported by the majority but rather the kook fringe which makes up the Democratic Party so by all means run from reality
 
What post are you referring to? Are you referring to my starting this thread about Trump's dangerous rhetoric, or are you referring to my 'radical' comment to @JustHanging about the Neo-Nazi piece of crap Christopher Cantwell that was in the YouTube video he posted?

No, the post where you posted a video of a rightwing Nazi, want me to post videos of leftwing socialists/communists? What purpose did it serve posting it here other than to generate support from your minions of leftwing socialist wannabees.
 
And the most homeless, most in poverty, highest cost of living, lowest quality of life but keep dreaming how great that state is and ignore the pictures I posted. You kick ass in rhetoric but never actual social issues and supporting federal law.

Most in poverty? You know they have the most people, right?
 
I have posted the links and pictures over and over again only to be ignored. Google is your friend or in your case your enemy, suggest you use it and stop promoting something you don't understand. Getting tired of posting links, having them ignored, and then asking for them again, start with the Census bureau on poverty

Nothing was ignored, and I did not even question the accuracy of what you posted. I just questioned the logic of trying to compare the housing cost and cost of living of a state like California to the housing cost and cost of living of a state with a lower population density. It is simply an issue of the basic supply and demand law that high density areas will have much higher housing prices and cost of living.
 
And yet the left continues to pour fuel on the fire.
 
No, the post where you posted a video of a rightwing Nazi,

Those are Trump's biggest supporters. That's why Trump publicly defended them, saying some are "very fine people."


What purpose did it serve posting it here other than to generate support from your minions of leftwing socialist wannabees.

I know this wasn't directed at me, but answer is obvious if you put some effort into it: To bring some reality to the discussion, because some of Trump's base continue to defend and/or deny his racist behavior.
 
Nothing was ignored, and I did not even question the accuracy of what you posted. I just questioned the logic of trying to compare the housing cost and cost of living of a state like California to the housing cost and cost of living of a state with a lower population density. It is simply an issue of the basic supply and demand law that high density areas will have much higher housing prices and cost of living.

You place a lot of emphasis on demand but none of the laws and regulations builders have to meet to build in California along with the taxes that fund the bureaucracy there. How does any liberal who professes to care about the poor support the actions of the bureaucrats in the state that generates these kind of results.
 
Those are Trump's biggest supporters. They're who Trump was referring to when he said some are "very fine people."




I know this wasn't directed at me, but answer is obvious if you put some effort into it: To bring some reality to the discussion.

That is quite a stretch as it appears that all people who support Trump fall into that category including me who was a life long Democrat until that party was taken over by radicals. I have voted for more Democrats than you have probably voted Republican. One of these days you too will grow out of that ideology. That video wasn't reality that was red meat for radicals. Want some red meat for conservatives with Obama supporters on video?
 
No, the post where you posted a video of a rightwing Nazi, want me to post videos of leftwing socialists/communists? What purpose did it serve posting it here other than to generate support from your minions of leftwing socialist wannabees.

Show me where I posted that.
 
Last edited:
From your article:

Why is California No. 1?

The main culprit? Experts say it’s the high cost of housing.


According to your article, it's because so many people want to live there.

The place with more people has higher housing costs? I wonder if there were some basic market forces that could possibly explain this.
 
Nothing was ignored, and I did not even question the accuracy of what you posted. I just questioned the logic of trying to compare the housing cost and cost of living of a state like California to the housing cost and cost of living of a state with a lower population density. It is simply an issue of the basic supply and demand law that high density areas will have much higher housing prices and cost of living.

Jumping in here, but there is a reason why California's population is not increasing and slowing down....

While your last sentence is correct, the high taxes that CA pays is a problem as well.
 
That is quite a stretch as it appears that all people who support Trump fall into that category including me who was a life long Democrat until that party was taken over by radicals.

If you're going to support a blatant racist like Trump, and defend or deny his racist behavior, then the label is apt imo.

I have voted for more Democrats than you have probably voted Republican. One of these days you too will grow out of that ideology.

Apparently Trump had the correct ideology for you.

That video wasn't reality that was red meat for radicals.

It was absolute reality. That is typical of who Trump was defending when he said some KKK and Neo Nazis are "very fine people". A bully and a coward, just like Trump, all brave when he's got support, willing to make all sorts of threats, but then crying and begging when it comes time to pay the piper.
 
Last edited:
You place a lot of emphasis on demand but none of the laws and regulations builders have to meet to build in California along with the taxes that fund the bureaucracy there. How does any liberal who professes to care about the poor support the actions of the bureaucrats in the state that generates these kind of results.

Even with identical regulations, and even with every other factor being equal, it is logical to claim that a state with higher population density will have a higher housing cost. And since this housing cost is the most important factor in the cost of living, it does not make sense to compare states of higher population density to states of lower population density.
 
The place with more people has higher housing costs? I wonder if there were some basic market forces that could possibly explain this.

:mrgreen:
 
If you're going to support a blatant racist like Trump, and defend or deny his racist behavior, then the label is apt imo.



Apparently Trump had the correct ideology for you.



It was absolute reality. A bully and a coward, just like Trump, all brave when he's got support, willing to make all sorts of threats, but then crying and begging when it comes time to pay the piper.

I think you just described the entire internet.
 
From your article:

Why is California No. 1?

The main culprit? Experts say it’s the high cost of housing.


According to your article, it's because so many people want to live there.

So in your world the high cost of housing is due entirely to demand?? Taxes, regulations don't play any role?
 
I think you just described the entire internet.

Nope. But I did accurately describe Trump. Like all bullies, he's a coward when cornered.
 
If you're going to support a blatant racist like Trump, and defend or deny his racist behavior, then the label is apt imo.



Apparently Trump had the correct ideology for you.



It was absolute reality. A bully and a coward, just like Trump, all brave when he's got support, willing to make all sorts of threats, but then crying and begging when it comes time to pay the piper.

I find it amazing that a racist like Trump has created historic low unemployment rates for African and Hispanic Americans blowing our first African American Presidents numbers out of the water. How do you reconcile your claims with the actual results?
 
Even with identical regulations, and even with every other factor being equal, it is logical to claim that a state with higher population density will have a higher housing cost. And since this housing cost is the most important factor in the cost of living, it does not make sense to compare states of higher population density to states of lower population density.

Sorry but that is an excuse for ignoring the high cost of living in the state due to high taxes and regulations for you see there is no such thing as a free lunch as all those social programs have to be paid for
 
Nope. But I did accurately describe Trump. Like all bullies, he's a coward when cornered.

LOL Just like you....you can talk all tough on here etc, but in real life, you act all polite and respectful etc....no shame in it, everyone does it, just have the balls to own up to it.
 
Back
Top Bottom